The Circumcision Ceremony of Alvaro Nunes da Costa, aka Nathan Curiël (1665-1736/38)

Romeyn de Hooghe (mentioned on object), 1665

  • Artwork typedrawing
  • Object numberRP-T-00-381
  • Dimensionsheight 555 mm x width 685 mm
  • Physical characteristicsblack chalk, point of the brush and grey and black ink, over traces of graphite, on vellum; framing lines in black chalk (left, right and lower border, partially trimmed) and black ink (upper border, partially trimmed)

Identification

  • Title(s)

    The Circumcision Ceremony of Alvaro Nunes da Costa, aka Nathan Curiël (1665-1736/38)

  • Object type

  • Object number

    RP-T-00-381


Creation

  • Creation

    draftsman (artist): Romeyn de Hooghe (mentioned on object), Amsterdam

  • Dating

    1665

  • Search further with


Material and technique

  • Physical description

    black chalk, point of the brush and grey and black ink, over traces of graphite, on vellum; framing lines in black chalk (left, right and lower border, partially trimmed) and black ink (upper border, partially trimmed)

  • Dimensions

    height 555 mm x width 685 mm


This work is about

  • Person

  • Subject


Acquisition and rights

  • Copyright

  • Provenance

    ? commissioned by Jeronimo Nunes da Costa (1620-97), Amsterdam; ...; ? by inheritance to a member of the Lopes Suasso family; by whom consigned to anonymous sale, Amsterdam (J. de Vries et al.), 29 October 1838, section ‘_Teekeningen en prenten in lijsten met glazen_’, no. 5 (‘_Een Kraamkamer, waarin de besnijdenisplegtigheid plaats heeft, eene ordonantie van eene menigte rijk gekleede personen, fraai geteekend met zw. kr. en o.i. inkt, door Romyn de Hooghe_’), with two other drawings, fl. 6:25:-, to ‘Senator’;{Copy RKD.} ...; first recorded in the museum in 1973, probably acquired by 1872


Documentation


Related objects

  • Related


Persistent URL


Romeyn de Hooghe

The Circumcision Ceremony of Alvaro Nunes da Costa, aka Nathan Curiël (1665-1736/38)

Amsterdam, 1665

Inscriptions

  • signed and dated: lower right, in black chalk, Romanus de Hooghe / pinxit 1665


Provenance

? commissioned by Jeronimo Nunes da Costa (1620-97), Amsterdam; ...; ? by inheritance to a member of the Lopes Suasso family; by whom consigned to anonymous sale, Amsterdam (J. de Vries et al.), 29 October 1838, section ‘Teekeningen en prenten in lijsten met glazen’, no. 5 (‘Een Kraamkamer, waarin de besnijdenisplegtigheid plaats heeft, eene ordonantie van eene menigte rijk gekleede personen, fraai geteekend met zw. kr. en o.i. inkt, door Romyn de Hooghe’), with two other drawings, fl. 6:25:-, to ‘Senator’;1Copy RKD. ...; first recorded in the museum in 1973, probably acquired by 1872

Object number: RP-T-00-381


The artist

Biography

Romeyn de Hooghe (Amsterdam 1645 - 1708 Haarlem)

He was the third child of the button maker Romeyn de Hooghe, sr (1620-1664) and Susanne Gerarts (1619-1673)2A. Bredius, ‘Uit de “Minute octrooien der Staten van Holland van West-Friesland” and “Losse aanteekeningen omtrent Hollandsche plaatsnijders”’, in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, VII (1890), p. 249. and was baptized on 10 September 1645 in the Zuiderkerk in Amsterdam.3A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 24, n. 4. His family, from his father’s side, had immigrated to Amsterdam from Ghent in the late sixteenth century. He attended the Latin School and was probably trained as a printmaker. His earliest etchings are copies after Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683), one dated 1662 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-55.011), the same year that he enrolled in the Guild of St Luke in The Hague.4Ibid., p. 12. From 1663 to 1668 he was back in Amsterdam, and in 1667 he received his first commission as a book illustrator.5The title print of the poem De Zee-straet by Constantijn Huygens (1596-1687); cf. A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 12-27, fig. 2, after a drawn design by Jan de Bisschop (1628-1671). The same year, his first newsprints were published, illustrating the raid by the Dutch navy under Admiral Michiel de Ruyter (1607-1676) near Rochester and Chatham (e.g. inv. nos. RP-P-OB-79.256 and RP-P-OB-79.257), the latter after one of several paintings of the subject by Willem Schellinks (1623-1678). Romeyn de Hooghe continued to make newsprints until the end of his life, increasingly after his own designs, such as Peace Treaty at Breda between England and the Dutch Republic of 1667 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-67.707), of which his design is preserved in the Albertina, Vienna (inv. no. 10163).6H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 126-45, fig. 8.

In the summer of 1668, De Hooghe went to Paris. There, he produced a print of the baptism ceremony of the French Dauphin.7H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, fig. 2.3. By 1669, he was again back in Amsterdam, living on the Reguliersgracht in the south-eastern part of the city. On 1 May 1673, he posted marriage banns with Maria Lansman (1649-1718) from Edam, the 23-year old daughter of Anna Mits (1628-1679) and the late Andreas Lansman (1625-1666), a minister of the Reformed Church in Amsterdam.8A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aanteekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten’ (II), Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 153. In 1674, the couple moved to the Jonge Roelofssteeg and in 1677 to the Binnenkant Canal (presently Binnenkant 27). Their only daughter, Maria Romana, was baptized on 14 March 1674 in the Nieuwezijdskapel in Amsterdam. She died in December 1694, age twenty.

As a printmaker, with his shop located at the Kalverstraat from 1674 and from 1676 at Dam Square, Romeyn de Hooghe became the leading chronicler of his generation, addressing a wide audience with his newsprints and broadsides. From 1670, he contributed the yearly frontispiece for the Hollandsche Mercurius in Haarlem, a cooperation that was to last until 1690.

In the mid-1670s, De Hooghe was also active as an art dealer and agent, apparently profiting from his good contacts to the Sephardic Jewish community. One of its members, Franciscus Mollo (1648/49-1721), became his major partner in business. Mollo had established contact with the Polish king Jan III Sobieski (1629-1696), for whom De Hooghe bought paintings at auctions, for instance, at the sale of Joannes de Renialme Jansz (1641-1687) on 7 May 1687. Between 1673 and 1685, De Hooghe etched several portraits of Jan Sobieski, who raised him to the rank of ‘servitor’ in 1675, granting him freedom of taxes from the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth.

In 1682, the De Hooghe and his family moved to Haarlem, where they lived in a house on the Geldelozepad. In 1683, Romeyn enlisted as a member of the city’s artist society, Confrerie Pictura, probably to attend the newly founded Drawing Academy.

After settling in Haarlem, Romeyn’s rise in social status, already evident from his acquisition in 1675 of a feudal tenure at Borrendam, near Schouwen in the province of Zeeland, resulted in several communal functions. In 1686, he was one of the three regents of the Pietershuis, a private foundation supporting poor orphans. In 1687 and 1688, he served as magistrate (‘commissaris’) of the Minor Bench of Justice (‘Kleine Bank van Justitie’) and on 3 June 1689, he received a doctorate in law at the University of Harderwijk. By 1690, he had become a regent of the Armekinderhuis, the municipal orphanage of Haarlem. In 1695, he bought a fief in Heemstede in Kennermerland. In 1706, he was appointed custodian of the Hortus Medicus in Haarlem, which had been laid out to his design in 1696. In 1688, Romeyn planned to establish a drawing school in Haarlem. Probably running from 1692, the drawing school was situated in the Ridderstraat, at the back of the garden of his newly-built house at the Nieuwe Gracht 13, where the De Hooghe family had moved in July 1689.

In 1688/89, Romeyn was involved in the so-called ‘pamphlete quarrel’ (‘pamflettenstrijd’), his antagonist being the Amsterdam advocate Nicolaas Muys van Holy (c. 1653/54-1717), leader of the Anti-Orange party.9C. van de Haar, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe en de pamflettenstrijd van de jaaren 1689 en 1690’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 69 (1956), pp. 155-69. In the same period, he produced the ‘Harlequin Prints’, satirical broadsides aimed against the politics of King Louis XIV of France (1638-1715) and taking the side of the Stadholder-King Willem III (1650-1702). After 1689, Romeyn also acted as a political agent on behalf of the Stadholder. Supporting Willem III had its rewards. In 1689, Romeyn was appointed commissary and supervisor of the mining district of Lingen, an office from which he profited in many ways. He was allowed to move his drawing school to a bulwark facing the river Spaarne that was given to him for storing the Lingen bluestone, and he became supplier of bluestone for the Palace Het Loo. De Hooghe was also involved in designing the gardens of that newly-built palace.

Romeyn de Hooghe was an extremely productive and versatile artist. In the course of almost forty-five years, he made over 4300 prints. As a book illustrator, he worked for 170 different publishers and contributed to at least 465 book titles, including reprints. Thematically, the subjects ranged from the Bible to a wrestling manual and scientific works, such as the Aeloude en hedendaegsche scheeps-bouw (1671) of Nicolaes Witsen (1641-1717). Besides prints of portraits, battles, historic events, stately homes and princely gardens, maps, festivities and erotic subjects, he also designed commemorative coins, garden sculpture and stained-glass windows. Although not trained as a painter, he occasionally produced wall and ceiling paintings, for instance in the archer’s hall (‘doelen’) of the militia of St George in Rotterdam (1699-1700). His magnum opus in this respect were the murals in the mayor’s chamber (‘burgemeesterskamer’) in the Town Hall of Enkhuizen, 1707.10M. van Eikema Hommes and P. Bakker, ‘Hoogachtbaarheid en ontzaglijke grootheid. De burgemeesterskamer van het stadhuis van Enkhuizen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 222-43, figs. 1-6.

Of his many pupils, only a few are known, such as Filibertus Bouttats (1635-1707), Adriaen Schoonebeeck (c. 1657/58-1705), Aernout Naghtegael (1658-1737), Jacobus Harrewijn (1660-1727), Frans Decker (1684-1751), François Harrewijn (1700-1764) and Laurens Scherm (active 1689-1701). A truly universal artist, Romeyn de Hooghe died on 10 June and was buried on 15 June 1708 in St Bavo, Haarlem.

Annemarie Stefes, 2019

References
A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, III (1721), pp. 257-65; J.C. Weyerman, De levens-beschryvingen der Nederlandsche konst-schilders en konst-schilderessen, 4 vols., The Hague/Dordrecht 1729-69, I (1729), p. 93; III (1729), p. 114; F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, I (1877-78), pp. 124, 151; II (1879-80), pp. 2-4, 7; III (1880), pp. 200, 206; IV (1881-82), pp. 107-08, 155; V (1882-83), p. 318; VII (1888-90), pp. 31, 33, 38, 41, 53, 156, 249; F. Muller, De Nederlandsche geschiedenis in platen. Beredeneerde beschrijving van Nederlandsche historieplaten, zinneprenten en historische kaarten, 4 vols., Amsterdam 1863-82, I (1863-70), pp. 331-34, 336, 338, 347-48, 350-51, 357, 359-60, 362, 364-65, 367-68, 370, 374, 376-84, 387-94, 396-402, 405, 407, 411-18, 426-28, 430, 433-34, 436-37, 443-45, 447, 450, 454, 458-60; A. von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstlerlexikon, 3 vols., Vienna/Leipzig 1906-11, I (1906), pp. 718-19; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XVII (1924), pp. 458-61 (text by M.D. Henkel); F.G. Waller, Biographisch woordenboek van Noord Nederlandsche graveurs, The Hague 1938, p. 149; J. Landwehr, Romeyn de Hooghe the Etcher: Contemporary Portrayal of Europe, 1662-1707, Leiden 1973, pp. 15-16; W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974 (PhD diss. Harvard University), I, pp. 21-69; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), pp. 118-32; M.J.C. Otten, ‘Biografie van Romeyn de Hooghe’, De Boekenwereld 5 (1988-89), pp. 20-33; E. Buijsen (ed.), Haagse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw. Het Hoogsteder Lexicon van alle schilders werkzaam in Den Haag, 1600-1700, Zwolle 1998, p. 316; P. Groenendijk, Beknopt biografisch lexicon van Zuid- en Noord-Nederlandse schilders, graveurs, glasschilders, tapijtwevers et cetera van ca. 1350 tot ca. 1720, Utrecht 2008, pp. 418-19; H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008; A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 34 (2010), pp. 20-27; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018; RKD artists https://rkd.nl/artists/39559


Entry

Not only is this sheet the artist’s only fully signed and dated drawing, it is his earliest signed work.11Even earlier, he dated one of his etchings after Nicolaes Berchem (‘1662’); F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 128, no. 345; however, before having been admitted to the guild, probably in 1667, he was not allowed to sign his prints; cf. H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, pp. 46-47. Although the date was often misread as ‘1668’, the last digit is actually a ‘5’, confirming that it is the work of a twenty-year-old. The early date is surprising, given it is a large and pretentious work, on costly vellum, not made to be hidden in a portfolio but, apparently, most probably framed and hung like a painting on a wall.12Anonymous sale, Amsterdam, 29 October 1838. This is suggested by the signature’s ‘pinxit’ (‘painted’) and the pin holes that may indicate that it was once pinned to a wall.

Its subject – a circumcision ceremony in a Jewish household of consequence – provides rare visual evidence of Sephardic Jewish culture in seventeenth-century Amsterdam, a community with which De Hooghe was closely affiliated. A similar scene is represented in a drawing by Bernard Picart (1673-1733) in the Amsterdam Museum (inv. no. TA 10258).13W.H. Wilson, ‘The Circumcision; A Drawing by Romeyn de Hooghe’, Master Drawings 13 (1975), pp. 250-60 (fig.4). The Sephardic Jews, originally from Portugal and Spain, had become a small but powerful community of approximately 400 families. Like the Ashkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe, the Sephardim had a liberal mind-set that also allowed the display of works of art in their homes. Other prints of Jewish subject-matter by De Hooghe include The Opening Ceremony of the New Portuguese Synagogue in Amsterdam in 1675 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB.79.308).14F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 121, no. 118. On the artist’s other ‘Jewish Prints’, cf. ibid., nos. 257-61; and A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 112-25. One of the Synagogue’s then directors, or ‘Parnassim’, was Jeronimo Nunes da Costa (c. 1618/19-1697), also known as Moseh Curiël.15J.I. Israel, ‘The Diplomatic Career of Jeronimo Nunes da Costa: An Episode in Dutch-Portuguese Relations of the Seventeenth Century’, BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review 99 (1983), pp. 167-90. Immensely rich, acting as commercial consul for the King of Portugal in Amsterdam and belonging to the (few) Amsterdam supporters of Willem III, he financed De Hooghe’s nine etchings of the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem circa 1695.16A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 122-24. Romeyn also made an engraving of Nunes da Costa’s town house at Nieuw Herengracht (then called Joden Herengracht) 59 in the mid-1690s (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-AO-25-75),17F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 126, no. 257. and he may have commissioned the present sheet, as was first suggested by Wilson.18W.H. Wilson, ‘The Circumcision: A Drawing by Romeyn de Hooghe’, Master Drawings 13 (1975), p. 252-56; A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 114; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, pp. 73-74. Earlier authors had regarded the poet Daniel Levi de Barrios (1635-1701) as commissioner of the drawing, an idea pursued in the museum’s inventory book, where the present sheet was described as the circumcision of Simon Levi de Barrios, who was born on 17 March 1665.19J. Zwarts, The Significance of Rembrandt’s ‘The Jewish Bride’, Amersfoort 1929, p. 21; and M.H. Gans, Memorboek. Platenatlas van het leven der joden in Nederland van de middeleeuwen tot 1940, Baarn 1971, p. 61. According to Van Nierop, this early work of 1665 may have earned De Hooghe his later commissions.20H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, p. 74. Could the boy with the goblet, standing behind the seated man in the composition, be the eldest son of Jeronimo Nunes da Costa, Alexander Nunes da Costa, aka Salomon Curiël (1655-1712)?21O. Schutte, Repertorium der buitenlandse vertegenwoordigers, residerende in Nederland, 1584-1810, The Hague 1983, pp. 622, 636. In 1665, he would have been ten years old. Francisco de Nunes da Costa, aka Jacob de Moseh Curiël, born circa 1659/60,22Ibid., pp. 622-23. could be the boy of five or six years kneeling next to his mother’s bed, and Alvaro Nunes da Costa, aka Nathan Curiël (1665-1736/38),23Ibid., pp. 623, 637; although Schutte gave the birth year as ‘1665/1666’, the drawing’s date confirms the earlier year. would be the baby boy who was the subject of the circumcision.

According to Jewish law, the ritual of circumcision was conducted on the eighth day after a baby boy’s birth (Genesis 17: 11-12). In Romeyn de Hooghe’s drawing, the ceremony is about to happen. An old man, the ‘sandik’ (from the Greek ‘syndikos’ or patron), is holding the newborn on his lap. The professional circumciser (‘mohel’) is dressed in black and wearing a yarmulke. With his left hand, he reaches across the baby for the knife that is presented on a silver plate by an assistant, together with a foreskin shield, a pear-shaped vial containing oil and a small dish with astringent powder, both used as healing agents. Next to the sandik, there is an empty chair where the infant had been seated a moment earlier, the so-called chair of Elijah. To the left, the proud father is standing, while the mother is resting in a canopied French bed. She would have been Ribca (Rebecca) de Selomo Abas (1634-1691). The fifteen guests include not only family members but apparently also dignitaries such as Rabbi Isaac Aboab da Fonseca (1605-1693), one of the elders of the Portuguese Synagogue, who is standing behind the sandik, wearing a yarmulke and a square-cut beard.24A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 112-25, p. 125 (n. 14).

Romeyn de Hooghe also depicted, with equal care, the stately home setting of the circumcision ceremony, an interior that reflects both the wealth and the godliness of its inhabitants. On the carved doorway in centre a blessing is written in Hebrew (‘Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out’). Two large paintings decorate the back wall, revealing the collecting activities of family members, such as the grandfather Jacob da Costa (?-1665), who died in Hamburg, probably leaving his collection to his son.25W.H. Wilson, ‘The Circumcision: A Drawing by Romeyn de Hooghe’, Master Drawings 13 (1975), p. 254. Both pictures depict scenes from the Old Testament, the one on the left Ezekiel and the Vision of the Wheel (Ezekiel 1: 15-21), that on the right Elijah Fed by Ravens (1 Kings 17:6). The carpet, if turned upside-down, represents another Old Testament subject, possibly the High Priest Melchizedek Greeting the Army of Abraham.26Ibid., p. 256.

Annemarie Stefes, 2019


Literature

J. Zwarts, The significance of Rembrandt’s the Jewish Bride, Amersfoort 1929, p. 21 (and opp. p. 30); F. Landsberger, Rembrandt, the Jews and the Bible, Philadelphia 1946, pp. 20-21, pl. 3; R.H. Fuchs, Rembrandt en Amsterdam, Rotterdam 1968, p. 45, fig. 72; Mokum en Mediene, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Jewish Historical Museum) 1971, no. 195; M.H. Gans, Memorboek. Platenatlas van het leven der joden in Nederland van de middeleeuwen tot 1940, Baarn 1971, p. 61; W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974 (PhD diss., Harvard University), II, pp. 194, 333, 344-48, no. 2 (erroneously with inv. no. ‘1867’ and as dated ‘1668’), fig. 248; M.J.C. Otten, ‘Biografie van Romeyn de Hooghe’, De Boekenwereld 5 (1988), pp. 21-22 (fig. 2); S. Baskind, ‘Bernard Picart’s Etchings of Amsterdam Jews’, Jewish Social Studies 13 (2007), p. 52; A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 12 (as 1668); A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 112-14 (fig. 1; as 1665/68); H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 136, 145 (n. 34); H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, pp. 73-74 (fig. 2.9; as between 1665 and 1668)


Citation

A. Stefes, 2019, 'Romeyn de Hooghe, The Circumcision Ceremony of Alvaro Nunes da Costa, aka Nathan Curiël (1665-1736/38), Amsterdam, 1665', in J. Turner (ed.), (under construction) Drawings 2, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200146407

(accessed 18 April 2026 02:30:45).

Footnotes

  • 1Copy RKD.
  • 2A. Bredius, ‘Uit de “Minute octrooien der Staten van Holland van West-Friesland” and “Losse aanteekeningen omtrent Hollandsche plaatsnijders”’, in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, VII (1890), p. 249.
  • 3A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 24, n. 4.
  • 4Ibid., p. 12.
  • 5The title print of the poem De Zee-straet by Constantijn Huygens (1596-1687); cf. A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 12-27, fig. 2, after a drawn design by Jan de Bisschop (1628-1671).
  • 6H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 126-45, fig. 8.
  • 7H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, fig. 2.3.
  • 8A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aanteekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten’ (II), Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 153.
  • 9C. van de Haar, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe en de pamflettenstrijd van de jaaren 1689 en 1690’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 69 (1956), pp. 155-69.
  • 10M. van Eikema Hommes and P. Bakker, ‘Hoogachtbaarheid en ontzaglijke grootheid. De burgemeesterskamer van het stadhuis van Enkhuizen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 222-43, figs. 1-6.
  • 11Even earlier, he dated one of his etchings after Nicolaes Berchem (‘1662’); F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 128, no. 345; however, before having been admitted to the guild, probably in 1667, he was not allowed to sign his prints; cf. H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, pp. 46-47.
  • 12Anonymous sale, Amsterdam, 29 October 1838.
  • 13W.H. Wilson, ‘The Circumcision; A Drawing by Romeyn de Hooghe’, Master Drawings 13 (1975), pp. 250-60 (fig.4).
  • 14F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 121, no. 118. On the artist’s other ‘Jewish Prints’, cf. ibid., nos. 257-61; and A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 112-25.
  • 15J.I. Israel, ‘The Diplomatic Career of Jeronimo Nunes da Costa: An Episode in Dutch-Portuguese Relations of the Seventeenth Century’, BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review 99 (1983), pp. 167-90.
  • 16A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 122-24.
  • 17F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 126, no. 257.
  • 18W.H. Wilson, ‘The Circumcision: A Drawing by Romeyn de Hooghe’, Master Drawings 13 (1975), p. 252-56; A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 114; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, pp. 73-74.
  • 19J. Zwarts, The Significance of Rembrandt’s ‘The Jewish Bride’, Amersfoort 1929, p. 21; and M.H. Gans, Memorboek. Platenatlas van het leven der joden in Nederland van de middeleeuwen tot 1940, Baarn 1971, p. 61.
  • 20H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, p. 74.
  • 21O. Schutte, Repertorium der buitenlandse vertegenwoordigers, residerende in Nederland, 1584-1810, The Hague 1983, pp. 622, 636.
  • 22Ibid., pp. 622-23.
  • 23Ibid., pp. 623, 637; although Schutte gave the birth year as ‘1665/1666’, the drawing’s date confirms the earlier year.
  • 24A.K. Offenberg, ‘De wijze stad aan de Amstel. De joodse prenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 112-25, p. 125 (n. 14).
  • 25W.H. Wilson, ‘The Circumcision: A Drawing by Romeyn de Hooghe’, Master Drawings 13 (1975), p. 254.
  • 26Ibid., p. 256.