Design for a Broadside on the Persecution of Protestants by Louis XIV (‘Beautiful Constance Dragooned by Harlequin Deodat’)

Romeyn de Hooghe, 1688

La belle Constance (de Franse protestanten) worden het hof gemaakt door Lodewijk XIV, Jezuïeten en soldaten. Bij de groep rechts met koning Jacobus II en de koningin met het ondergeschoven kind kan zij ook geen veiligheid kunnen vinden. Ontwerp voor een prent.

  • Artwork typedrawing, design
  • Object numberRP-T-00-332
  • Dimensionsheight 335 mm x width 375 mm
  • Physical characteristicspen and brown ink, with grey wash, traces of black chalk; squared for transfer with red chalk and graphite; framing lines in red chalk

Romeyn de Hooghe

Design for a Broadside on the Persecution of Protestants by Louis XIV (‘Beautiful Constance Dragooned by Harlequin Deodat’)

? Haarlem, 1688

Inscriptions

  • inscribed on verso: lower right, probably by museum staff, in a nineteenth-century hand, in pencil, Muller / N° 2757

  • stamped on verso: lower left, with the mark of the museum (L. 240)


Technical notes

watermark: Strasbourg lily (barely legible); neither in Heawood nor in Laurentius


Provenance

…; collection Pieter Cornelis Baron van Leyden, Heer van Vlaardingen (1717-88), Leiden;1His inventory, Portfolio 31.2, as ‘Een geestelijke die de hand op een vrouw haar boezem leid (...) benevens de Tekening’. his daughter, Françoise Johanna Gael-van Leyden (1745-1813), Leiden; from whom, en bloc, fl. 100.000.00, to Lodewijk Napoleon Bonaparte, King of Holland (1778-1846, Amsterdam), 1807;2J.W. Niemeijer, ‘Baron van Leyden, Founder of the Amsterdam Print Collection’, Apollo, 117 (1983), no. 256, pp. 467-68. transferred to the Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague, 1808; transferred to the museum (L. 240), 1816

Object number: RP-T-00-332


The artist

Biography

Romeyn de Hooghe (Amsterdam 1645 - 1708 Haarlem)

He was the third child of the button maker Romeyn de Hooghe, sr (1620-1664) and Susanne Gerarts (1619-1673)3A. Bredius, ‘Uit de “Minute octrooien der Staten van Holland van West-Friesland” and “Losse aanteekeningen omtrent Hollandsche plaatsnijders”’, in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, VII (1890), p. 249. and was baptized on 10 September 1645 in the Zuiderkerk in Amsterdam.4A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 24, n. 4. His family, from his father’s side, had immigrated to Amsterdam from Ghent in the late sixteenth century. He attended the Latin School and was probably trained as a printmaker. His earliest etchings are copies after Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683), one dated 1662 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-55.011), the same year that he enrolled in the Guild of St Luke in The Hague.5Ibid., p. 12. From 1663 to 1668 he was back in Amsterdam, and in 1667 he received his first commission as a book illustrator.6The title print of the poem De Zee-straet by Constantijn Huygens (1596-1687); cf. A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 12-27, fig. 2, after a drawn design by Jan de Bisschop (1628-1671). The same year, his first newsprints were published, illustrating the raid by the Dutch navy under Admiral Michiel de Ruyter (1607-1676) near Rochester and Chatham (e.g. inv. nos. RP-P-OB-79.256 and RP-P-OB-79.257), the latter after one of several paintings of the subject by Willem Schellinks (1623-1678). Romeyn de Hooghe continued to make newsprints until the end of his life, increasingly after his own designs, such as Peace Treaty at Breda between England and the Dutch Republic of 1667 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-67.707), of which his design is preserved in the Albertina, Vienna (inv. no. 10163).7H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 126-45, fig. 8.

In the summer of 1668, De Hooghe went to Paris. There, he produced a print of the baptism ceremony of the French Dauphin.8H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, fig. 2.3. By 1669, he was again back in Amsterdam, living on the Reguliersgracht in the south-eastern part of the city. On 1 May 1673, he posted marriage banns with Maria Lansman (1649-1718) from Edam, the 23-year old daughter of Anna Mits (1628-1679) and the late Andreas Lansman (1625-1666), a minister of the Reformed Church in Amsterdam.9A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aanteekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten’ (II), Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 153. In 1674, the couple moved to the Jonge Roelofssteeg and in 1677 to the Binnenkant Canal (presently Binnenkant 27). Their only daughter, Maria Romana, was baptized on 14 March 1674 in the Nieuwezijdskapel in Amsterdam. She died in December 1694, age twenty.

As a printmaker, with his shop located at the Kalverstraat from 1674 and from 1676 at Dam Square, Romeyn de Hooghe became the leading chronicler of his generation, addressing a wide audience with his newsprints and broadsides. From 1670, he contributed the yearly frontispiece for the Hollandsche Mercurius in Haarlem, a cooperation that was to last until 1690.

In the mid-1670s, De Hooghe was also active as an art dealer and agent, apparently profiting from his good contacts to the Sephardic Jewish community. One of its members, Franciscus Mollo (1648/49-1721), became his major partner in business. Mollo had established contact with the Polish king Jan III Sobieski (1629-1696), for whom De Hooghe bought paintings at auctions, for instance, at the sale of Joannes de Renialme Jansz (1641-1687) on 7 May 1687. Between 1673 and 1685, De Hooghe etched several portraits of Jan Sobieski, who raised him to the rank of ‘servitor’ in 1675, granting him freedom of taxes from the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth.

In 1682, the De Hooghe and his family moved to Haarlem, where they lived in a house on the Geldelozepad. In 1683, Romeyn enlisted as a member of the city’s artist society, Confrerie Pictura, probably to attend the newly founded Drawing Academy.

After settling in Haarlem, Romeyn’s rise in social status, already evident from his acquisition in 1675 of a feudal tenure at Borrendam, near Schouwen in the province of Zeeland, resulted in several communal functions. In 1686, he was one of the three regents of the Pietershuis, a private foundation supporting poor orphans. In 1687 and 1688, he served as magistrate (‘commissaris’) of the Minor Bench of Justice (‘Kleine Bank van Justitie’) and on 3 June 1689, he received a doctorate in law at the University of Harderwijk. By 1690, he had become a regent of the Armekinderhuis, the municipal orphanage of Haarlem. In 1695, he bought a fief in Heemstede in Kennermerland. In 1706, he was appointed custodian of the Hortus Medicus in Haarlem, which had been laid out to his design in 1696. In 1688, Romeyn planned to establish a drawing school in Haarlem. Probably running from 1692, the drawing school was situated in the Ridderstraat, at the back of the garden of his newly-built house at the Nieuwe Gracht 13, where the De Hooghe family had moved in July 1689.

In 1688/89, Romeyn was involved in the so-called ‘pamphlete quarrel’ (‘pamflettenstrijd’), his antagonist being the Amsterdam advocate Nicolaas Muys van Holy (c. 1653/54-1717), leader of the Anti-Orange party.10C. van de Haar, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe en de pamflettenstrijd van de jaaren 1689 en 1690’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 69 (1956), pp. 155-69. In the same period, he produced the ‘Harlequin Prints’, satirical broadsides aimed against the politics of King Louis XIV of France (1638-1715) and taking the side of the Stadholder-King Willem III (1650-1702). After 1689, Romeyn also acted as a political agent on behalf of the Stadholder. Supporting Willem III had its rewards. In 1689, Romeyn was appointed commissary and supervisor of the mining district of Lingen, an office from which he profited in many ways. He was allowed to move his drawing school to a bulwark facing the river Spaarne that was given to him for storing the Lingen bluestone, and he became supplier of bluestone for the Palace Het Loo. De Hooghe was also involved in designing the gardens of that newly-built palace.

Romeyn de Hooghe was an extremely productive and versatile artist. In the course of almost forty-five years, he made over 4300 prints. As a book illustrator, he worked for 170 different publishers and contributed to at least 465 book titles, including reprints. Thematically, the subjects ranged from the Bible to a wrestling manual and scientific works, such as the Aeloude en hedendaegsche scheeps-bouw (1671) of Nicolaes Witsen (1641-1717). Besides prints of portraits, battles, historic events, stately homes and princely gardens, maps, festivities and erotic subjects, he also designed commemorative coins, garden sculpture and stained-glass windows. Although not trained as a painter, he occasionally produced wall and ceiling paintings, for instance in the archer’s hall (‘doelen’) of the militia of St George in Rotterdam (1699-1700). His magnum opus in this respect were the murals in the mayor’s chamber (‘burgemeesterskamer’) in the Town Hall of Enkhuizen, 1707.11M. van Eikema Hommes and P. Bakker, ‘Hoogachtbaarheid en ontzaglijke grootheid. De burgemeesterskamer van het stadhuis van Enkhuizen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 222-43, figs. 1-6.

Of his many pupils, only a few are known, such as Filibertus Bouttats (1635-1707), Adriaen Schoonebeeck (c. 1657/58-1705), Aernout Naghtegael (1658-1737), Jacobus Harrewijn (1660-1727), Frans Decker (1684-1751), François Harrewijn (1700-1764) and Laurens Scherm (active 1689-1701). A truly universal artist, Romeyn de Hooghe died on 10 June and was buried on 15 June 1708 in St Bavo, Haarlem.

Annemarie Stefes, 2019

References
A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, III (1721), pp. 257-65; J.C. Weyerman, De levens-beschryvingen der Nederlandsche konst-schilders en konst-schilderessen, 4 vols., The Hague/Dordrecht 1729-69, I (1729), p. 93; III (1729), p. 114; F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, I (1877-78), pp. 124, 151; II (1879-80), pp. 2-4, 7; III (1880), pp. 200, 206; IV (1881-82), pp. 107-08, 155; V (1882-83), p. 318; VII (1888-90), pp. 31, 33, 38, 41, 53, 156, 249; F. Muller, De Nederlandsche geschiedenis in platen. Beredeneerde beschrijving van Nederlandsche historieplaten, zinneprenten en historische kaarten, 4 vols., Amsterdam 1863-82, I (1863-70), pp. 331-34, 336, 338, 347-48, 350-51, 357, 359-60, 362, 364-65, 367-68, 370, 374, 376-84, 387-94, 396-402, 405, 407, 411-18, 426-28, 430, 433-34, 436-37, 443-45, 447, 450, 454, 458-60; A. von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstlerlexikon, 3 vols., Vienna/Leipzig 1906-11, I (1906), pp. 718-19; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XVII (1924), pp. 458-61 (text by M.D. Henkel); F.G. Waller, Biographisch woordenboek van Noord Nederlandsche graveurs, The Hague 1938, p. 149; J. Landwehr, Romeyn de Hooghe the Etcher: Contemporary Portrayal of Europe, 1662-1707, Leiden 1973, pp. 15-16; W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974 (PhD diss. Harvard University), I, pp. 21-69; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), pp. 118-32; M.J.C. Otten, ‘Biografie van Romeyn de Hooghe’, De Boekenwereld 5 (1988-89), pp. 20-33; E. Buijsen (ed.), Haagse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw. Het Hoogsteder Lexicon van alle schilders werkzaam in Den Haag, 1600-1700, Zwolle 1998, p. 316; P. Groenendijk, Beknopt biografisch lexicon van Zuid- en Noord-Nederlandse schilders, graveurs, glasschilders, tapijtwevers et cetera van ca. 1350 tot ca. 1720, Utrecht 2008, pp. 418-19; H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008; A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 34 (2010), pp. 20-27; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018; RKD artists https://rkd.nl/artists/39559


Entry

The present drawing is the design for the illustration to a satirical broadside, the first of a group of nine. It was etched in the same sense, possibly by an assistant of De Hooghe,12Suggested by H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 135. under the title ‘La Belle Constance dragonné par Arlequin deodat’ (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-79.343).13F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 124, no. 157; the note on the verso of the drawing refers to this print, being F. Muller, De Nederlandsche geschiedenis in platen. Beredeneerde beschrijving van Nederlandsche historieplaten, zinneprenten en historische kaarten, 4 vols., Amsterdam 1863-82, I (1863-70), p. 421, no. 2757. In this print series, made between 1688 and 1689, De Hooghe reacted on then current political events, attacking the opponents of Willem III (1650-1702) in a highly original and burlesque imagery. The Dutch verses in these broadsides were probably written by De Hooghe himself.14H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, p. 136; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, p. 217. Later editions also included a French translation of the text. Whether the nine prints were made on commission, or – more likely – created by De Hooghe on his own initiative in unknown. In any case, he would have been well advised not to sign them with his own name. With the alias ‘Gisling from Geneva’ (‘Gisling Geneve’), the publication of the prints became a diplomatic affair, resulting in the Amsterdam magistrates burning several impressions on 17 September 1688.15H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, pp. 138-39. Romeyn de Hooghe was, however, rewarded with patronage from Willem III.16Ibid., pp. 150-51.

The composition is a comment on the revocation of the Edict of Nantes on 18 October 1685 and the subsequent persecution of the Huguenots. Protestant religion is personified by ‘la belle Constance’, a beautiful maiden who is dragooned – a direct comment on actual events17Dragooning was a means of terror, with soldiers being sent to quarter with Protestants, being allowed to rob and torture them, to lead them to Catholic services, and to declare them as proselytes, cf. W. Cillessen (ed.), Krieg der Bilder: Druckgraphik als Medium politischer Auseinandersetzung im Europa des Absolutismus, exh. cat. Berlin (Deutsches Historisches Museum) 1997, p. 209. – by soldiers and by a Jesuit priest towards her suitor, the Harlequin Deodat. This character, taken from the then very popular Commedia dell’Arte, was an invention of Romeyn de Hooghe, mocking Louis XIV (1638-1715) and alluding to the King’s middle name Dieudonné (Latin ‘Deodatus’, i.e. gift of God).18H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, p. 149. In the corresponding etching, his costume is overly decorated with Catholic symbols, such as crosses, the IHS sign, and a book marked ‘Missal 1688’. However, his courting remains fruitless, as is stated in the poem: ‘nobody’s heart can be conquered by force’ (‘de dwang kan niemands hart bekooren’).

The composition includes another member of the cast, a woman lifting an infant right behind the Harlequin. This is Mary of Modena (1658-1718), the Queen of England, with her son James Francis Edward (1688-1766), Prince of Wales, who was born after years of infertility. The supposedly miraculous birth was considered a fraud by the Protestants, all the more since it deprived Willem III from his chances to inherit the throne of England.19Willem’s wife Mary (1662-1694), daughter of James II (1633-1701), had been next in the line of succession before the birth of the Prince of Wales. In later broadsides by De Hooghe, little James was not spared the accusation of being a fake prince, namely the son of a miller (or of a Jesuit), even taunted as the ‘little Antichrist’, as in L’Epiphane du Nouveau Antichrist, 1689 (inv. no. RP-P-OB-67.724).20F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 124, no. 158.

The print’s poem describes Constance fleeing into the arms of her ‘overseas cousin’ (‘overzeesche Neef’), aka England, which, however, subjects her to even deeper slavery (‘Gy valt in swaarder slaverny’). Fortunately, rescue is at hand in the form of her ‘brother’, Willem III, whose arrival is announced (‘Maar hier verschijnt uw Broêr, o Maagd! Die sich op ‘t Land en ‘t Waater waagd’). The broadside was meant to encourage Willem to take a more active role in European politics.21M. Hale, ‘Drie konigen, een haan, en een ezel. De spotprenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 100, 106 (against Amsterdam regents that opted in favour of a more neutral position).

Romeyn de Hooghe left many details in the drawing unfinished. The squaring in red chalk (and apparently also graphite, though the vertical graphite line in centre was partially effaced) was presumably used to transfer the design to a second sheet, the possible model for the print. In the etched version, the overdoor painting (which replaces the present drawing’s bust in a circular niche) represents the bombardment of Algiers on 1 July 1688, when the French, having lost several ships, were forced to retire. The inscription ‘Algeria Non Allegria. Plus de bruit, Que de Fruit’ (‘Algeria not cheerful. More hubbub than fruit’) alludes to this failed expedition. That detail may have been a later development from the present design.

The sheet is the only design known for the series. Such unfinished sketches received little interest by eighteenth-century collectors of drawings.22Cf. H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 136. To print collectors and owners of historic atlases, however, they were appealing. Indeed, the sheet’s survival may have resulted from its being preserved together with the print in the collection of Baron P.C. van Leyden.23Ibid.

Annemarie Stefes, 2019


Literature

W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974 (PhD diss. Harvard University), II, pp. 252, 355-56, no. 9 (fig. 257); C.H. Schuckman, ‘Ruim een eeuw onderzoek naar Romeyn de Hooghe. Beredeneerde bibliografie’, De Boekenwereld 5 (1988), p. 53 (fig. 1); H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 134-37, 139 (fig. 6); H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, p. 162; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, p. 219


Citation

A. Stefes, 2019, 'Romeyn de Hooghe, Design for a Broadside on the Persecution of Protestants by Louis XIV (‘Beautiful Constance Dragooned by Harlequin Deodat’), Haarlem, 1688', in J. Turner (ed.), (under construction) Drawings 2, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200140835

(accessed 11 December 2025 10:41:46).

Footnotes

  • 1His inventory, Portfolio 31.2, as ‘Een geestelijke die de hand op een vrouw haar boezem leid (...) benevens de Tekening’.
  • 2J.W. Niemeijer, ‘Baron van Leyden, Founder of the Amsterdam Print Collection’, Apollo, 117 (1983), no. 256, pp. 467-68.
  • 3A. Bredius, ‘Uit de “Minute octrooien der Staten van Holland van West-Friesland” and “Losse aanteekeningen omtrent Hollandsche plaatsnijders”’, in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, VII (1890), p. 249.
  • 4A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 24, n. 4.
  • 5Ibid., p. 12.
  • 6The title print of the poem De Zee-straet by Constantijn Huygens (1596-1687); cf. A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 12-27, fig. 2, after a drawn design by Jan de Bisschop (1628-1671).
  • 7H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 126-45, fig. 8.
  • 8H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, fig. 2.3.
  • 9A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aanteekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten’ (II), Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 153.
  • 10C. van de Haar, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe en de pamflettenstrijd van de jaaren 1689 en 1690’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 69 (1956), pp. 155-69.
  • 11M. van Eikema Hommes and P. Bakker, ‘Hoogachtbaarheid en ontzaglijke grootheid. De burgemeesterskamer van het stadhuis van Enkhuizen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 222-43, figs. 1-6.
  • 12Suggested by H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 135.
  • 13F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 124, no. 157; the note on the verso of the drawing refers to this print, being F. Muller, De Nederlandsche geschiedenis in platen. Beredeneerde beschrijving van Nederlandsche historieplaten, zinneprenten en historische kaarten, 4 vols., Amsterdam 1863-82, I (1863-70), p. 421, no. 2757.
  • 14H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, p. 136; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708); Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, p. 217. Later editions also included a French translation of the text.
  • 15H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, pp. 138-39.
  • 16Ibid., pp. 150-51.
  • 17Dragooning was a means of terror, with soldiers being sent to quarter with Protestants, being allowed to rob and torture them, to lead them to Catholic services, and to declare them as proselytes, cf. W. Cillessen (ed.), Krieg der Bilder: Druckgraphik als Medium politischer Auseinandersetzung im Europa des Absolutismus, exh. cat. Berlin (Deutsches Historisches Museum) 1997, p. 209.
  • 18H. van Nierop, ‘Lampooning Louis XIV: Romeyn de Hooghe’s Harlequin Prints, 1688-89’, in T. Claydon and C.-E. Levillain, Louis XIV Outside In: Images of the Sun King beyond France, 1661-1715, Farnham 2015, p. 149.
  • 19Willem’s wife Mary (1662-1694), daughter of James II (1633-1701), had been next in the line of succession before the birth of the Prince of Wales.
  • 20F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), p. 124, no. 158.
  • 21M. Hale, ‘Drie konigen, een haan, en een ezel. De spotprenten’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 100, 106 (against Amsterdam regents that opted in favour of a more neutral position).
  • 22Cf. H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 136.
  • 23Ibid.