Sketch of the Heeswijkerpoort/ recto: View of the Heeswijkerpoort, Montfoort

Pieter Mulier (II), c. 1654 - c. 1655

Gezicht op de stadswal en de Heeswijkerpoort in Montfoort

  • Artwork typedrawing
  • Object numberRP-T-1883-A-221(V)
  • Dimensionsheight 258 mm x width 405 mm
  • Physical characteristicsblack chalk

Discover more

more by Pieter Mulier (II)

Watermolen bij een ingestorte brug

Pieter Mulier (II), c. 1647 - c. 1701

Watermolen bij een ingestorte brug

View of the Heeswijkerpoort, Montfoort

Pieter Mulier (II), c. 1654 - c. 1655

View of the Heeswijkerpoort, Montfoort

Italianate Landscape with Herders Crossing a Ford

attributed to Pieter Mulier (II), 1647 - 1701

Italianate Landscape with Herders Crossing a Ford

Pieter Mulier (II)

Sketch of the Heeswijkerpoort/ recto: View of the Heeswijkerpoort, Montfoort

c. 1654 - c. 1655

Inscriptions

  • inscribed: centre, in a nineteenth-century hand, in pencil, P Molier / De waterpoort te Leerdam / Coll Mad Hoofman; lower left, by Ploos van Amstel, in brown ink, de waterpoort te Leerdam / P: Mulier f / h. 10 d / b. 15 ¾ d (L. 3002-3003); to the left, in an eighteenth-century hand, in graphite, N 25/10; below that, in an eighteenth-century hand, perhaps by an assistant of Ploos van Amstel, in graphite, ƒ ta; below that, in brown ink, concealed by lining paper, N°: 6 [?]; next to that, in a nineteenth-century hand, in pencil, n 92

  • stamped: lower centre, with the mark of the museum (L. 2228)

Technical notes

watermark: double-headed eagle; similar to Laurentius 2007, I, no. 388 (1641) or II, no. 299 (1660)

Condition

Vertical fold in centre

Provenance

…; sale, Daniel Marsbag (1736-75, Amsterdam), Amsterdam (Cornelis Ploos van Amstel et al.), 30 October 1775 sqq., Album B, no. 99 (‘Molier. Een Gezigt van de Water Poort te Leerdam: ziende men in de Rivier twee Schuitjes met Hengelaars. Met zwaart Kryt en Oostind. Inkt gewassen’), fl. 40:10:-, to Cornelis Ploos van Amstel (1726-1798), Amsterdam (L. 3002, 3003);1Hofstede de Groot notes, RKD, no. 354000. his sale, Amsterdam (P. van der Schley et al.), 3 March 1800 sqq., Album N, no. 26 (‘De Waterpoort te Leerdam; met zwart Kryt en Roet, door P. Molier’), fl. 31, to the dealer C. Josi, Amsterdam and London;2Copy RKD. …; sale, Johannes Hermanus Molkenboer (1773-1824, Amsterdam), Amsterdam (J. de Vries et al.), 17 October 1825, Album P, no. 24 (‘Gezigt op de Waterpoort te Leerdam; met zwart krijt en roet’), fl. 2, to the dealer A. Brondgeest, Amsterdam;3Copy RKD. …; collection Maria Hoofman (1776-1845), Haarlem;4According to an inscription on the verso. …; from the dealer F. Muller, Amsterdam, fl. 28:50:, to the museum (L. 2228), 1883

Object number: RP-T-1883-A-221(V)

The artist

Biography

Pieter Mulier II, called Cavalier Tempesta (Haarlem 1637 - 1701 Milan)

He was born in Haarlem in 1637 to the marine painter Pieter Mulier I (c. 1590/1615-1659) and his wife, Maeycken de Graat (?-?). His parents had married in Haarlem on 25 February 1635. They were Baptists, his father of Flemish origin. Pieter II, who is mentioned in the records of the Haarlem Guild of St Luke (without a date), was probably taught by his father. Since his earliest works, solely drawings, betray the influence of Pieter de Molijn (1595-1661) and Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683), he may also have been a pupil of one of these artists. Before he set out for the South, Mulier travelled through Holland, working and selling paintings, as was reported in 1730 by his biographer Lione Pascoli (1674-1744), who probably got his information from Mulier’s descendants. In 1655, Mulier went to Antwerp and probably from there to Brussels, as is documented by three panoramic drawings, two of which are now untraced and one of which is in the Musée de la Ville, Brussels (inv. no. unknown).5A. Zwollo, ‘Pieter Mulier de Jonge (1637-1701), alias Tempesta, werkzaam als tekenaar in Haarlem, Montfoort, Brussel, Bronnbach en Rome’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 26 (2003), figs. 18-20. In Antwerp, the young artist met a Carmelite monk who converted him to Catholicism, gave him letters of recommendation for Rome and might have accompanied him on his journey there. Travelling via Bronnbach near Würzburg, a trip documented by a drawing in the Grafschaftsmuseum, Wertheim (inv. no. L 50/1987, on long-term loan from Baden-Württemberg),6Ibid., fig. 21. Mulier probably continued to Augsburg, opting to cross into Italy via the Brenner Pass. By 1656, he must have arrived in Rome. Soon after his arrival, he married Lucia Rossi (1635-1675). Residing first in the parish of S. Lorenzo in Lucina, later in the Corso near S. Maria del Popolo, Mulier headed a large household, including his wife and children, his sister Anna Maria Mulier (c. 1635/40-1689), his mother-in-law Maria Gorini (c. 1607-?) and his sister-in-law Elisabetta Rossi (1644-?).

Probably through the intervention of the Carmelite, Mulier met important patrons in Rome, including Ferdinando Orsini, 4th Duke of Bracciano (1656-1660), his son and successor, Flavio Orsini (1660-1698), Cardinal Giberto Borromeo (1615-1673) and Don Lorenzo Onofrio Colonna (1637-1689). Mulier’s frescoes in the Palazzo Colonna in the Piazza SS Apostoli, made shortly before 1668, are among the highlights of his career.7M. Roethlisberger, Cavalier Pietro Tempesta and his Time, Newark 1970, nos. 176-81. Three of his eight frescoes depict tempests at sea. With such subjects, he not only followed his father’s example, but also found a niche in the market and, not surprisingly, acquired the bent-name Tempeest (‘Tempest’) as a member of the Bentvueghels (society of Northern artists in Rome). In Italy he was known by the Italianized version of this nickname, Cavalier Tempesta. He also signed with that form of name, the earliest known example being a drawing (1659) in the Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin (KdZ 13741).8Ibid., no. 148. Apart from the frescoes in the Palazzo Colonna, the only other works preserved from his Roman years are imaginary drawn views, which retain something of a Dutch character: these are preserved in the Gabinetto Disegni e Stampe degli Uffizi, Florence (inv. no. 8740 S), the Courtauld Gallery, London (signed and dated 1657; inv. no. D.1952.RW.4084), and the Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, Brussels (signed and dated 1657; inv. no. 4060/2662).9Ibid., nos. 144-46.

Another nickname by which he was known was Petrus de Mulieribus (‘Pieter of the women’), probably alluding to his unconventional lifestyle. His abandonment of his family and his departure from Rome for Genoa in 1668 may have been provoked by jealousy over the behaviour of his wife, Lucia, who was said to have been a prostitute. In 1675 she was killed, and the following year Mulier was imprisoned under suspicion of murder, since he was already living together with a new mistress, the Turinese gentlewoman Anna Eleonora Beltrami (?-?), who had been abandoned by her husband. In 1679 Mulier was sentenced to twenty years in prison. The same year, he married Anna Eleonora (whose brother had already married Mulier’s sister Anna Maria in 1675). Mulier continued to paint while in prison. After eight years, he was pronounced innocent, and on 15 October 1684 he was freed owing to the intervention of his prominent protectors, the Spanish governor of Milan, Don Giovanni de Cabrera, Conte de Melgar (1597-1647), and Conte Vitaliano Borromeo (1620-1690). For the remaining years, he lived in Milan in grand style, even maintaining a zoo from which he made life studies of animals. He travelled throughout Lombardy and the Veneto, becoming the leading landscape and marine painter in North Italy. His work reflects the influence of both Gaspard Dughet (1615-1675) and Salvator Rosa (1615-1673). Despite his success as an artist, Mulier was incapable of managing his money and spent his last years in misery. His last dated work is the painted Landscape with the Journey of Rebecca of 1701, preserved in a private collection, Milan,10Ibid., no. 267. He died on 29 June of the same year and was buried in the small church of S. Calimero, Milan.

Unlike his fellow Dutch Italianate artists, Mulier completely assimilated to Italian life and culture, enjoying a large circle of local friends, patrons and benefactors. His most important output dates from his late years in Genoa, Venice and Lombardy, with paintings preserved in many old Italian private collections, the largest share being some eighty works in the collection of Principe Giberto Borromeo at Isola Bella, whose archive also contains more than forty letters by the artist, written mostly from jail. Through his many pupils, his impact on the field of marine, landscape and animal paintings was far-reaching and lasted long far into the eighteenth century.

Annemarie Stefes, 2019

References

P.A. Orlandi, Abcedario pittorico, Bologna 1704, p. 119; A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, III (1721), pp. 183-84; L. Pascoli, Vite de‘ pittori, scultori, ed architetti moderni, 2 vols., Rome 1730-36, I (1730), pp. 177-84; A. Bredius (ed.), Künstler-Inventare: Urkunden zur Geschichte der holländischen Kunst des XVIten, XVIIten und XVIIIten Jahrhunderts, 8 vols., The Hague 1915-22, VI (1918), p. 2219; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XXV (1931), pp. 259-60 (entry by T.H. Fokker); G.J. Hoogewerff, Nederlandsche kunstenaars te Rome (1600-1725). Uittreksels uit de parochiale archieven, The Hague 1942, pp. 48-51, 66, 76, 142-43, 147, 149-50; G.J. Hoogewerff, De Bentvueghels, The Hague 1952, p. 140; M. Roethlisberger, Cavalier Pietro Tempesta and his Time, Newark 1970, pp. 2-63; L. Salerno, Pittori di paesaggio del Seicento a Roma, 3 vols., Rome 1977-80, II (1978), pp. 638-41; H. Miedema, De archiefbescheiden van het St. Lukasgilde te Haarlem, 1497-1789, 2 vols., Alphen aan den Rijn 1980, II, pp. 934, 1039, 1041; H.-U. Beck, Jan van Goyen (1596-1656): Ein Oeuvreverzeichnis, 4 vols., Amsterdam 1972-91, IV (1991), pp. 333-35; P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, pp. 165-67; A. Zwollo, ‘Pieter Mulier de Jonge (1637-1701), alias Tempesta, werkzaam als tekenaar in Haarlem, Montfoort, Brussel, Bronnbach en Rome’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 26 (2003), pp. 19-45; A. Beyer et al. (eds.), Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon: Die bildenden Künstler aller Zeiten und Völker, Munich 1992-, LXXXXI (2016), pp. 239-40 (entry by P. Biesboer)

Entry

The traditional attribution to Pieter Mulier II, noted in the 1775 auction catalogue of the collector Daniel Marsbag (1736-1775), is supported by stylistically-related, signed drawings, such as Italianate Landscape with Shepherds near a City Wall (1657) in the Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, Brussels (inv. no. 4060/2662).11S. Hautekeete, Tekeningen uit de Gouden Eeuw in de verzameling Jean de Grez, exh. cat. Brussels (Koninklijke Musea voor Schone Kunsten van België)/Amsterdam (Museum Het Rembrandthuis)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2007-08, no. 52. The present drawing, with an unfinished initial sketch of the main structure on the verso, belongs to a group of washed chalk drawings of various Dutch cities carried out during the early phase of Mulier’s career, before he settled in Italy, where he was known as Cavalier Tempesta. These early sheets betray the influence of fellow Haarlem artists, such as Pieter de Molijn (1595-1661) and especially Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683).

There has been considerable confusion about the identification of the location and city gate represented on both sides of the Rijksmuseum drawing. According to the inscription on the verso by Cornelis Ploos van Amstel (1726-1798), it shows the Waterpoort or Steigerpoort in Leerdam, but the roadway through that city gate runs through the sides of the structure rather than through its gable ends, as can be seen in a painting by Jan Weissenbruch (1822-1880) in the Rijksmuseum’s collection (inv. no. SK-A-1160). In 2007, I misidentified the scene in the drawing as depicting the Willeskopperpoort in Montfoort,12A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), p. 39 (fig. 4). but that site is securely documented by a lost drawing from 1609, copied circa 1700 by Jacobus Stellingwerff (1667-1727) on a sheet that he inscribed, now preserved in the Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, Brussels (inv. no. 4060/3462 ).13A. Zwollo, ‘Pieter Mulier de Jonge (1637-1701), alias Tempesta, werkzaam als tekenaar in Haarlem, Montfoort, Brussel, Bronnbach en Rome’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 26 (2003), fig. 13. That drawing reveals that the Willeskopperpoort was much taller, with a footbridge (not just a jetty) fully crossing the canal.

However, Montfoort was the correct town for the depiction, even if it was the wrong city gate. As Zwollo recorded,14Ibid., p. 28. the most likely location of the view is Montfoort’s eastern gate, the Heeswijkerpoort, an identification first proposed by Charles Noordam. The round tower seen in the distance could well be the same building represented from inside the city walls by Herman Saftleven (1609-1685) in a drawing in the Morgan Library & Museum, New York (inv. no. 1958.19),15Ibid., fig. 9. as well as a near identical version of the same view by his older brother, Cornelis Saftleven (1607-1681) in the Bibliothèque Royale de Belgique, Brussels (inv. no. R-2009-25030).

What is also important about the present drawing by Mulier is that it, too, exists in more than one version. It is thought that before he left for Italy he may have studied with Nicolaes Berchem.16B.P.J. Broos and M. Schapelhouman, Nederlandse tekenaars geboren tussen 1600 en 1660, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1993 (Oude tekeningen in het bezit van het Amsterdams Historisch Museum, waaronder de collectie Fodor, vol. 4), p. 120, under no. 80; A. Stefes, Nicolaes Pietersz. Berchem: Die Zeichnungen, 3 vols., Bern 1997 (PhD diss., Universität Bern), I, pp. 48, 88. This hypothesis cannot be documented, but it is supported by three pairs of identical views of Montfoort when teacher and pupil might have been sketching together. Berchem’s rendering of the present view, with only minor differences in detail and staffage, is preserved in the Klassik Stiftung Weimar (inv. no. KK 4782).17A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), pp. 37-42 (fig. 5). A third version, in the Nationalmuseum, Stockholm (inv. no. 130/1866; see B. Magnusson, Dutch Drawings in Swedish Public Collections, Berlin 2018 (Drawings in Swedish Public Collections, vol. 10), no. 263), is apparently a copy after Berchem’s original. The other two sets of Mulier/Berchem pairs also depict portions of the city walls of Montfoort. Berchem’s drawing in the Albertina, Vienna (inv. no. 10107) – which was reworked by Isaac de Moucheron (1667-1744) – is matched by a sheet by Mulier in the Amsterdam Museum (inv. no. TA 10222).18A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), figs. 1 and 3. Yet another pair consists of a drawing by Berchem that featured on the Paris art market in 198919Sale, Paris (Drouot, Couturier Nicolay), 13 December 1989, no. 18. and a corresponding view by Mulier in the British Museum, London (inv. no. 1946,0713.164).20Ibid., figs. 9 and 6.

Annemarie Stefes, 2019

Literature

E. Knab, ‘De genio loci’, in H. Miedema et al. (eds.), Miscellanea I.Q. van Regteren Altena. 16-V-1969, Amsterdam 1969, p. 136 (fig. 20) (‘between Nicolaes Berchem and Jacob van Ruisdael?; as ‘Leerdam’); M. Roethlisberger, Cavalier Pietro Tempesta and his Time, Newark 1970, no. 142 (as ‘Leerdam’); J.W. Niemeijer et al., Cornelis Ploos van Amstel (1726-1798), exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksprentenkabinet) 1976, no. 147 (as ‘Leerdam’); R. van den Berg, Leerdam in de Gouden Eeuw, Ameide [1978], p. 74 (as ‘Leerdam’); J. Bats and R. van den Berg, De oude stadspoorten van Leerdam, s.l. [1980], p. 5 (as ‘Leerdam’); M. Schapelhouman and P. Schatborn, Land & water. Hollandse tekeningen uit de 17de eeuw in het Rijksprentenkabinet/Land & Water: Dutch Drawings from the 17th Century in the Rijksmuseum Print Room, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksprentenkabinet) 1987, no. 70; P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, p. 165 (fig. A); A. Zwollo, ‘Pieter Mulier de Jonge (1637-1701), alias Tempesta, werkzaam als tekenaar in Haarlem, Montfoort, Brussel, Bronnbach en Rome’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 26 (2003), pp. 26-29, 39, 40 (n. 1), fig. 12; S. Hautekeete, Tekeningen uit de Gouden Eeuw in de verzameling Jean de Grez, exh. cat. Brussels (Koninklijke Musea voor Schone Kunsten van België)/Amsterdam (Museum Het Rembrandthuis)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2007-08, p. 157, under no. 52; A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), p. 39 (fig. 4; as the Willeskopperpoort, Montfoort); B. Magnusson, Dutch Drawings in Swedish Public Collections, Berlin 2018 (Drawings in Swedish Public Collections, vol. 10), under no. 263

Citation

A. Stefes, 2019, 'Pieter (II) Mulier, Sketch of the Heeswijkerpoort/ recto: View of the Heeswijkerpoort, Montfoort, Montfoort, c. 1654 - c. 1655', in J. Turner (ed.), Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200780489

(accessed 3 December 2025 01:24:16).

Footnotes

  • 1Hofstede de Groot notes, RKD, no. 354000.
  • 2Copy RKD.
  • 3Copy RKD.
  • 4According to an inscription on the verso.
  • 5A. Zwollo, ‘Pieter Mulier de Jonge (1637-1701), alias Tempesta, werkzaam als tekenaar in Haarlem, Montfoort, Brussel, Bronnbach en Rome’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 26 (2003), figs. 18-20.
  • 6Ibid., fig. 21.
  • 7M. Roethlisberger, Cavalier Pietro Tempesta and his Time, Newark 1970, nos. 176-81.
  • 8Ibid., no. 148.
  • 9Ibid., nos. 144-46.
  • 10Ibid., no. 267.
  • 11S. Hautekeete, Tekeningen uit de Gouden Eeuw in de verzameling Jean de Grez, exh. cat. Brussels (Koninklijke Musea voor Schone Kunsten van België)/Amsterdam (Museum Het Rembrandthuis)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2007-08, no. 52.
  • 12A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), p. 39 (fig. 4).
  • 13A. Zwollo, ‘Pieter Mulier de Jonge (1637-1701), alias Tempesta, werkzaam als tekenaar in Haarlem, Montfoort, Brussel, Bronnbach en Rome’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 26 (2003), fig. 13.
  • 14Ibid., p. 28.
  • 15Ibid., fig. 9.
  • 16B.P.J. Broos and M. Schapelhouman, Nederlandse tekenaars geboren tussen 1600 en 1660, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1993 (Oude tekeningen in het bezit van het Amsterdams Historisch Museum, waaronder de collectie Fodor, vol. 4), p. 120, under no. 80; A. Stefes, Nicolaes Pietersz. Berchem: Die Zeichnungen, 3 vols., Bern 1997 (PhD diss., Universität Bern), I, pp. 48, 88.
  • 17A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), pp. 37-42 (fig. 5). A third version, in the Nationalmuseum, Stockholm (inv. no. 130/1866; see B. Magnusson, Dutch Drawings in Swedish Public Collections, Berlin 2018 (Drawings in Swedish Public Collections, vol. 10), no. 263), is apparently a copy after Berchem’s original.
  • 18A. Stefes, ‘Anmerkungen zu den Montfoort-Zeichnungen Nicolaes Berchems’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 31 (2007), figs. 1 and 3.
  • 19Sale, Paris (Drouot, Couturier Nicolay), 13 December 1989, no. 18.
  • 20Ibid., figs. 9 and 6.