Allegorical Triumph with Spoils of Weapons

Jan de Bray, 1650-12-11

  • Artwork typedrawing
  • Object numberRP-T-1972-81
  • Dimensionsheight 510 mm (arched top) x width 266 mm (arched top), height 560 mm x width 394 mm
  • Physical characteristicsblack and red chalk, with some opaque white watercolour, traces of pricking and a vertical subsidiary line in black chalk or graphite; framing line in black chalk

Identification

  • Title(s)

    Allegorical Triumph with Spoils of Weapons

  • Object type

  • Object number

    RP-T-1972-81

  • Part of catalogue


Creation

  • Creation

    • draftsman (artist): Jan de Bray, Haarlem (possibly)
    • after painting by Salomon de Bray
  • Dating

    1650-12-11

  • Search further with


Material and technique

  • Physical description

    black and red chalk, with some opaque white watercolour, traces of pricking and a vertical subsidiary line in black chalk or graphite; framing line in black chalk

  • Dimensions

    • height 510 mm (arched top) x width 266 mm (arched top)
    • height 560 mm x width 394 mm

This work is about

  • Person


Acquisition and rights

  • Credit line

    Purchased with the support of the Stichting tot Bevordering van de Belangen van het Rijksmuseum

  • Acquisition

    purchase 1972

  • Copyright

  • Provenance

    ...; ? sale, Aegidius Laurens Tolling (c. 1725-1768, Amsterdam), Amsterdam (H. de Winter et al.), 21 November 1768 _sqq_., Album I, no. 597 (‘_Twee stuks Ordinantien van eenige Krygslieden en anderen, zeer uitvoerig met rood en zwart Kryd getekend, door J. De Braey_’); ...; ? collection Johan Pieter van den Brande (1707-1758), Middelburg, or his son;{According to dossier J.W. Niemeijer, RMA.} by descent to Elbert Carsilius, Baron van Pallandt (1898-1964), Haarlem; his widow, Jonkvrouwe Matthia Abrahamina Cornelia van Pallandt-Sandberg (1899-1982), Arnhem and Haarlem; sale, Elbert Carsilius, Baron van Pallandt, Amsterdam (Sotheby Mak van Waay), 26 September 1972, no. 286, fl. 8.816, to the museum with the support of the Stichting tot Bevordering van de Belangen van het Rijksmuseum

  • Remarks

    Please note that this provenance was formulated with a special focus on provenance research for the years 1933-45 and could therefore be incomplete. There may be more (mostly earlier) provenance information known in the museum. In case this item has an uncertain or incomplete provenance for the years 1933-45, the Rijksmuseum welcomes information and assistance in the investigation and clarification of the provenance of all works during that era.


Documentation


Persistent URL


Jan de Bray, after Salomon de Bray

Allegorical Triumph with Spoils of Weapons

? Haarlem, 1650

Inscriptions

  • signed, dated and inscribed by the artist: lower right, in black chalk, JDBraij 1650 12/11 (J, D and B in ligature); lower centre, in black chalk, SD Bray 1650 (S and D in ligature)

  • stamped on verso: lower centre, with the mark of the museum (not in Lugt, Marques , variant of L. 2228a)


Technical notes

watermark : crescent; generally related to Heawood, no. 848 (Venice: 1548); crown, generally related to Heawood, no. 1122 (Bologna: 1631), but simpler and without a star


Provenance

...; ? sale, Aegidius Laurens Tolling (c. 1725-1768, Amsterdam), Amsterdam (H. de Winter et al.), 21 November 1768 sqq., Album I, no. 597 (‘Twee stuks Ordinantien van eenige Krygslieden en anderen, zeer uitvoerig met rood en zwart Kryd getekend, door J. De Braey’); ...; ? collection Johan Pieter van den Brande (1707-1758), Middelburg, or his son;1According to dossier J.W. Niemeijer, RMA. by descent to Elbert Carsilius, Baron van Pallandt (1898-1964), Haarlem; his widow, Jonkvrouwe Matthia Abrahamina Cornelia van Pallandt-Sandberg (1899-1982), Arnhem and Haarlem; sale, Elbert Carsilius, Baron van Pallandt, Amsterdam (Sotheby Mak van Waay), 26 September 1972, no. 286, fl. 8.816, to the museum with the support of the Stichting tot Bevordering van de Belangen van het Rijksmuseum

Object number: RP-T-1972-81

Credit line: Purchased with the support of the Stichting tot Bevordering van de Belangen van het Rijksmuseum


The artist

Biography

Jan de Bray (Haarlem, c. 1627 – Amsterdam, 1697)

He was the oldest son of the painter-architect Salomon de Bray (1597-1664) and his wife, Anna Westerbaen (1605-1663). His brothers Joseph de Bray (c. 1628/34-1664) and Dirck de Bray (c. 1638-1694) were artists as well. Jan spent the largest part of his career in his native Haarlem. No details about his early life and artistic training are known; it is thus assumed that Jan was trained in his father’s workshop. His maternal uncle, Jan Westerbaen (c. 1600/02-1686), was a portrait painter in The Hague and undoubtedly contributed to Jan’s formative years as a portraitist.2P. Biesboer (ed.), Painting Family: The De Brays: Master Painters of 17th-century Holland, exh. cat. Haarlem (Frans Hals Museum)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery) 2008, p. 19. His earliest surviving drawing, the Portrait of an 81-year old Man in the British Museum, London (inv. no. 1895,0915.1127), is dated 1648;3J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, no. T2. the earliest painting, a Portrait of a Five-year-old Girl in the National Gallery, Prague (inv. no. O 1113), is from 1650.4Ibid, no. 1. In 1664 Jan entered the Haarlem Guild of St Luke and established himself as a portrait painter. Like his father, he also worked as an architect. Several etchings by his hand are also known. From 1688 until his death, De Bray lived and worked in Amsterdam, where in 1692 he was granted citizenship.5Ibid., p. 18; RKD Artists, https://rkd.nl/explore/artists/12194; accessed 10 May 2021.

De Bray married three times, in 1668, 1672 and 1678. Each union was short-lived: the first two wives died only a year after their marriage, his third marriage lasted only two years before his wife passed away. From this union a son was born, Jan Lucas de Bray (1678-?), who was named as Jan’s heir in the artist’s will of 1683.6Ibid., pp. 16, 19. The deaths of all three wives were followed by disputes over inheritance, and it may well have been that one of these lawsuits eventually contributed to De Bray’s bankruptcy in 1689. This financial blow and the consequent loss of social position may explain De Bray’s waning artistic drive from that year onward.7J.W. von Moltke, ‘De Bray family’ (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T011005; accessed 10 May 2021.

Paintings
Individual portraits make up more than half of De Bray’s painted output. Besides these, there are double portraits and five large and important group portraits, dating between 1663 and 1675 relating to the regent and the local Haarlem militia company. Responding to contemporary taste, De Bray also painted several historical family portraits – a cross between history painting and pure portraiture – in which sitters are depicted as personifications in Classical or mythological guise. The canvas David with the Harp (1674) in the Herzog Anton Ulrich-Museum, Braunschweig (inv. no. 286) is an example of De Bray’s purely historical imagery.8P. Biesboer (ed.), Painting Family: The De Brays: Master Painters of 17th-century Holland, exh. cat. Haarlem (Frans Hals Museum)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery) 2008, p. 100, fig. 34a. This picture also testifies of the artist’s increasingly academic style that permeated his work in the last decades of his career, at the cost of his originality and artistic spontaneity.

Drawings
After his father Solomon, Jan was the most talented and productive draughtsman of the family. His surviving corpus of drawings – 77 described in Giltaij’s catalogue raisonné – is relatively small, and it is assumed that many sheets were lost over time. Jan’s drawn oeuvre shows a variety of styles, which likely served different functions.9J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, p. 41. His drawing of 1648 in the British Museum shows strong affinity to the works of his fellow townsmen Cornelis Visscher (c. 1628/29-1658) and Cornelis Bega (c. 1631/32-1664). This ‘Haarlem style’ is characterized by the use of black and red chalk, fine lines and diagonal hatching, which Jan reserved mainly for his portrait drawings. These highly refined portraits, dating from the 1650s, are not related to painting commissions, but should be regarded as independent works of art.10Ibid., p. 41.

Figure studies in black and white chalk on blue paper also reflect the tradition of his Haarlem contemporaries and have led to confusion concerning their authorship. Several drawings previously attributed to De Bray, for example, have recently been identified as works by Leendert van der Cooghen (1632-1681).11Ibid., p. 48.

Another important category of drawings consists of ricordo copies after paintings by Jan’s father or himself. These relatively large and highly finished drawings were done either in black and/or red chalk, or in pen and brown ink, with delicate grey washes. Similar reproductive drawings by the other members of the family are known and form evidence of the close working relationship between the members of the family studio.12Ibid., p. 46. Both Jan and his brothers Joseph and possibly Dirck replicated the works by Salomon and himself. This practice is unique among contemporary Dutch artist families, and apparently was considered important in the formation of a kind of archive that could serve as a record of past projects and as source material for future commissions of prospective clients.13J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, pp. 367-68, 380, 390-91. Joseph made copies after paintings by both Salomon and Jan. Dirck may also have copied works by his father and brothers.

Less commonly preserved – although perhaps once numerous – are Jan’s land- and cityscapes in black chalk documenting the environs of Haarlem,14Cf. J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, p. 237-39. a subgenre that includes the museum’s two rudimentary sketches of Amsterdam shipyards (inv. nos. RP-T-1898-A-3513 and RP-T-1898-A-3514).

Many of the drawings by Jan de Bray are signed and dated, often recording the month, the day and the year, thereby providing highly accurate accounts of his artistic activities and development.

Saskia van Altena, 2021

References
A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, I (1718), p. 176; A. von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstlerlexikon, 3 vols., Vienna/Leipzig 1906-11, I, pp. 174-75; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, IV (1910), p. 555; W. Martin, De Hollandsche schilderkunst in die zeventiende eeuw: Frans Hans en zijn tijd. Onze 17e eeuwsche schilderkunst in het algemeen, in hare opkomst en rondom Frans Hals, Amsterdam [1935], 2 vols., I, pp. 27, 49, 117–19; J.W. von Moltke, ‘Jan de Bray’, Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 11/12 (1938-39), pp. 421-523; W. Bernt, Die niederländischen Zeichner des 17. Jahrhunderts, 2 vols., Munich 1957-58, I, pp. 114-115; A. Blankert, Gods, Saints and Heroes: Dutch Painting in the Age of Rembrandt, exh. cat. Washington (DC) (National Gallery of Art)/Detroit (Detroit Institute of Art)/Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1980-81, pp. 224-9; B. Haak, Hollandse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw, Amsterdam 1984, pp. 379-80; J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, pp. 367-94; J.W. von Moltke, “De Bray family” (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T011005; P. Biesboer (ed.), Painting Family: The De Brays: Master Painters of 17th-century Holland, exh. cat. Haarlem (Frans Hals Museum)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery) 2008; J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017; RKD Artists, https://rkd.nl/explore/artists/12194


Entry

Dated on 11 December 1650, the present sheet is one of the earliest drawings by Jan de Bray. It copies his father’s painting of the same year, probably before it was installed in the Oranjezaal) in the Huis ten Bosch, The Hague.15J.W. von Moltke, ‘Jan de Bray’, Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 11/12 (1938-39), pp. 421-523, no. 63; cf. J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, p. 371. To transfer the composition of the large painting, De Bray apparently worked with a grid or at least subsidiary lines, some of which are still faintly visible. Then 23 or 24 years old and working in his father’s studio, Jan may also have helped with the painting.16J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, p. 234.

The practice of creating a pictorial archive by drawn ricordi was a peculiarity of the De Bray’s studio.17On this subject, cf. J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, pp. 367-94. First, it was Salomon who made his own autograph copies, later his son Jan, and still later, Joseph joined in, as is shown in inv. no. RP-T-1972-82. Like the present sheet, Joseph’s drawing was drawn on old Italian paper, of which there must have been a stock in the family’s studio.

In his drawing, Jan translated the painted colours successfully into the bichrome values of black and red chalk. Highlights were created by leaving the white of the paper partially blank. Only in some cases did he use opaque white: for the strap of the boy’s garb or the saliva running from the open mouth of the large black dog. Jan accurately followed every detail of his father’s model, down to the pupils and highlights in the eyes.18The only deviations are found in the background sky, which is left untreated, and the pendentive above the pilasters. Such an accurate contemporary record is regarded a trustworthy document by present-day researchers. According to the drawing, with its shaded passages appearing subtler than in the painting, the respective parts in the painting are believed to having originally shown more degrees of tonal value, apparently having darkened over the centuries.19Cf. https://oranjezaal.rkdmonographs.nl/cat.-nr-10.html, under 2.2.4 and 4.

A fact overlooked so far is the use of pinpricking in the drawing. The corners of the single coffers of the ceiling were marked with a needle, as are the centres of the rosettes. This structure is pricked even in places where the architecture is covered by other motifs, such as shield, quiver and helmet on top of the pile of trophies. There is also a diagonal line of pricking rather randomly applied, running from the helmet with the lion’s head to the harness to the quiver. How is this procedure to be explained? Instead of being applied all over the drawing, the pricked ares mark only ‘strategic spots’ in a defined part of the composition, namely the barrel-vaulted ceiling. A similar ceiling, in reverse, is found in Salomon’s companion painting of 1649, the Allegorical Triumph with Musicians and Captured Flags. Presumably Jan would have made a ricordo of that piece as well.20Such a drawing might even be the companion of the present sheet in the catalogue of the Tolling sale. To achieve a mirror image of the identical architectural setting, pinpricking would have been an enormous time-saver. Jan would have placed the present sheet (with its present verso facing up) under the presumed first ricordo. He would have fixed it with pins in the lower half, the traces of which are still visible (left, at the forearm of the soldier standing in the shadow, and right, at the right edge of the old soldier’s round shield). Then he would have marked the structure of the ceiling with carefully placed pinpricks, a method that would spare him the intense task of creating two identical versions of the elaborate setting. After pricking, Jan would have needed only to turn the present sheet over (with its recto now facing up) to create a mirror image of the barrel vault corresponding to Salomon’s second painting. Only one question remains: what was the function of the pinpricked diagonal that does not relate to the present drawing’s composition? Could it be an echo of some diagonal found in the second triumph (e.g. contours of a flag), which Jan might have inadvertently copied?

Annemarie Stefes, 2019


Literature

‘Keuze uit aanwinsten’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 21 (1973), no.?, pp. 32, 43 (fig. 19); P. Schatborn, Dutch Figure Drawings from the Seventeenth Century, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksprentenkabinet)/Washington (National Gallery of Art) 1981-82, pp. 104, 132; J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, pp. 371, 374 (fig. 7), 392 (n. 17); B. Coenen, ‘The Drawings of the Haarlem Amateur Leendert van der Cooghen’, Master Drawings 43 (2005), no.1, pp. 19, 89 (n. 41; fig. 11); J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, pp. 41, 234-35, no. T7; https://oranjezaal.rkdmonographs.nl/cat.-nr-10.html, no. 3.1.2.1 (fig. 6; consulted 17 January 2018); A. Stefes, ‘Traces Traced: Methods of Transfer Found in Drawings by Karel Dujardin, Willem Romeyn and Jan de Bray’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 45 (2019), pp. 20-21


Citation

A. STefes, 2019, 'Jan de Bray, Allegorical Triumph with Spoils of Weapons, Haarlem, 1650-12-11', in J. Turner (ed.), Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200120131

(accessed 19 juni 2026 20:09:22 UTC+0).

Footnotes

  • 1According to dossier J.W. Niemeijer, RMA.
  • 2P. Biesboer (ed.), Painting Family: The De Brays: Master Painters of 17th-century Holland, exh. cat. Haarlem (Frans Hals Museum)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery) 2008, p. 19.
  • 3J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, no. T2.
  • 4Ibid, no. 1.
  • 5Ibid., p. 18; RKD Artists, https://rkd.nl/explore/artists/12194; accessed 10 May 2021.
  • 6Ibid., pp. 16, 19.
  • 7J.W. von Moltke, ‘De Bray family’ (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T011005; accessed 10 May 2021.
  • 8P. Biesboer (ed.), Painting Family: The De Brays: Master Painters of 17th-century Holland, exh. cat. Haarlem (Frans Hals Museum)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery) 2008, p. 100, fig. 34a.
  • 9J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, p. 41.
  • 10Ibid., p. 41.
  • 11Ibid., p. 48.
  • 12Ibid., p. 46. Both Jan and his brothers Joseph and possibly Dirck replicated the works by Salomon and himself.
  • 13J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, pp. 367-68, 380, 390-91. Joseph made copies after paintings by both Salomon and Jan. Dirck may also have copied works by his father and brothers.
  • 14Cf. J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, p. 237-39.
  • 15J.W. von Moltke, ‘Jan de Bray’, Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 11/12 (1938-39), pp. 421-523, no. 63; cf. J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, p. 371.
  • 16J. Giltaij, Jan de Bray (1626/1627-1697). Schilder en architect, Zwolle 2017, p. 234.
  • 17On this subject, cf. J. Giltaij and F. Lammertse, ‘Maintaining a Studio Archive: Drawn Copies by the De Braij Family’, Master Drawings 39 (2001), no. 4, pp. 367-94.
  • 18The only deviations are found in the background sky, which is left untreated, and the pendentive above the pilasters.
  • 19Cf. https://oranjezaal.rkdmonographs.nl/cat.-nr-10.html, under 2.2.4 and 4.
  • 20Such a drawing might even be the companion of the present sheet in the catalogue of the Tolling sale.