Getting started with the collection:
Portrait of a man
anonymous, c. 1540 - c. 1550
Portret van een man. Buste, driekwart naar rechts, baret op het hoofd, tegen een achtergrond van bomen. Zie ook de pendant.
- Artwork typepainting
- Object numberSK-A-2107
- Dimensionssupport: height 27.2 cm x width 22.2 cm x thickness 0.5 cm, depth 3.5 cm
- Physical characteristicsoil on panel
Identification
Title(s)
Portrait of a man
Object type
Object number
SK-A-2107
Description
Portret van een man. Buste, driekwart naar rechts, baret op het hoofd, tegen een achtergrond van bomen. Zie ook de pendant.
Part of catalogue
Creation
Creation
painter: anonymous, Northern Netherlands
Dating
c. 1540 - c. 1550
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
oil on panel
Dimensions
- support: height 27.2 cm x width 22.2 cm x thickness 0.5 cm
- depth 3.5 cm
This work is about
Subject
Acquisition and rights
Acquisition
purchase 1903-04
Copyright
Provenance
…; from the dealer F. Kleinberger, Paris, fl. 1,930, to the museum, April 1903
Related objects
Related
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!
anonymous
Portrait of a man
Northern Netherlands, c. 1540 - c. 1550
Technical notes
The support is a single vertically grained oak panel, 0.6 cm thick, which is slightly bevelled at the top and bottom. Dendrochronology has shown that the plank came from the same tree as the one used for the pendant SK-A-2108, and that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1516. The panel could have been ready for use by 1527, but a date in or after 1541 is more likely. Originally the reverse of the panel was probably covered with a light-coloured ground and reddish brown marbling, only some traces of which still remain. The ground on the front of the painting is probably of a light colour (off-white), and is smooth. Although there is much retouching along the edges, remains of an unpainted edge and traces of a barbe are present on the left and right sides. A white ‘imprimatura’ with broad brushstrokes, visible through the paint layers, was probably applied over the ground layer. An underdrawing could not be revealed with infrared reflectography. The figure was reserved. In general the paint layers were smoothly applied, although some impasto was used for the leaves and the man’s collar. The face was painted wet in wet.
Scientific examination and reports
- X-radiography: RMA, no. 710, 5 april 1954
- condition report: I. Verslype, RMA, 1 maart 2006
- infrared reflectography: M. Leeflang, RKD/RMA, no. NGb, 11 april 2006
- dendrochronology: P. Klein, RMA, 26 juni 2006
Condition
Fair. There are discoloured retouchings and much overpainting in the face. The varnish has yellowed and has been partially removed.
Conservation
- H.H. Mertens, 1958: complete restoration
Provenance
…; from the dealer F. Kleinberger, Paris, fl. 1,930, to the museum, April 1903
Object number: SK-A-2107
The artist
Biography
Anonymous, northern Netherlands
Entry
This portrait and its pendant (SK-A-2108) show an unknown man and his wife at bust length. The man is wearing a black cap, a white shirt with a gathered collar and a black coat. The woman has a simple black dress with a broad neckline revealing a white chemise underneath, and a white headdress. The figures are situated in front of landscapes with dark foliage. Ring rightly observed in 1913 that the relationship of the figures to the background is a little unclear.1Ring 1913, p. 30. Behind the man is a dark stand of trees, whereas on the pendant there is a simple hilly landscape with a church spire. The horizons in the two paintings are not at the same height. Since the portraits have retained their original dimensions (based on the bevelling on the backs of the panels and the barbes on the front), and the wood of the two panels came from the same tree.2See Technical notes. this is an original pair of portraits, and the difference in the height of the horizons must have been a deliberate decision on the artist’s part.
The paintings contain no internal clues as to the identities of the sitters. Clearly, though, these are northern Netherlandish portrait types. Ring dated them to the 1520s, and Hoogewerff agreed, speculating that they might be the self-portrait of the Haarlem painter Pieter Gerritsz and a portrait of his wife.3Ring 1913, p. 30; Hoogewerff II, 1937, pp. 502-04. Pieter Gerritsz was a contemporary of the Haarlem artist Jan Mostaert, but there is no surviving work that can be securely attributed to him. In any event, the combination of the date of the clothing (c. 1540), whereby the woman’s headdress is set high on the crown of her head and the gathering at the neck of the man’s shirt is still rather small, giving it a rather old-fashioned look,4With thanks to Marieke de Winkel for pointing this out. and the results of dendrochronological analysis (c. 1541) indicate that the pendants were painted around 1540-50. As yet no stylistic pointers have been found to the work of known painters active in the northern Netherlands in this period.
When the portraits were bought in 1903, both were in a single frame decorated with Renaissance ornaments with diagonal Corinthian columns on pedestals flanking a semicircular arch supported by pilasters filled with a shell (fig. a).
DM/ML
Literature
Ring 1913, p. 30 (as 1520s); Hoogewerff II, 1937, pp. 502-04 (as a Haarlem master, perhaps a self-portrait of the Haarlem painter Pieter Gerritsz and his wife)
Collection catalogues
1903, p. 14, nos. 141, 142 (as c. 1520, in the manner of Lucas van Leyden); 1934, p. 13, nos. 141, 142 (as c. 1520, in the manner of Lucas van Leyden); 1976, p. 652, nos. A 2107, A 2108 (as c. 1525)
Citation
D. Meuwissen, 2010, 'anonymous, Portrait of a man, Northern Netherlands, c. 1540 - c. 1550', in J.P. Filedt Kok (ed.), Early Netherlandish Paintings, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20025866
(accessed 8 December 2025 14:48:06).Figures
Footnotes
- 1Ring 1913, p. 30.
- 2See Technical notes.
- 3Ring 1913, p. 30; Hoogewerff II, 1937, pp. 502-04.
- 4With thanks to Marieke de Winkel for pointing this out.
