Portret van Armand Gaston Maximilien de Rohan

attributed to Nicolas Habert, 1660 - 1715

  • Artwork typeprint
  • Object numberRP-P-1910-5310
  • Dimensionsheight 230 mm x width 168 mm

Discover more

"historical persons" by Nicolas Habert

Portret van Charles Gobinet

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1691

Portret van Charles Gobinet

Portret van Antoine Furetière

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1688 - 1715

Portret van Antoine Furetière

Portret van Domenico Biancolelli

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1660 - 1715

Portret van Domenico Biancolelli

more by Nicolas Habert

Portret van Jean Baptiste Poquelin Molière

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1660 - 1715

Portret van Jean Baptiste Poquelin Molière

Portret van Charles Gobinet

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1691

Portret van Charles Gobinet

Portret van Louis de Pontis

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1660 - 1715

Portret van Louis de Pontis

Portret van Antoine Furetière

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1688 - 1715

Portret van Antoine Furetière

Portret van Domenico Biancolelli

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1660 - 1715

Portret van Domenico Biancolelli

Portret van Antoine le Maistre

Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), 1660 - 1715

Portret van Antoine le Maistre

Identification

  • Title(s)

    Portret van Armand Gaston Maximilien de Rohan

  • Object type

  • Object number

    RP-P-1910-5310

  • Inscriptions / marks

    collector's mark: Lugt 2228

  • Catalogue reference

    IFF 17e siècle 174-2(3)

Creation

  • Creation

    • printmaker: attributed to Nicolas Habert, Paris
    • after painting by François Jouvenet (mentioned on object)
    • publisher: Nicolas Habert (mentioned on object), Paris
    • publisher: Masson (uitgever) (mentioned on object), Paris

  • Dating

    1660 - 1715

  • Search further with

Material and technique

  • Dimensions

    height 230 mm x width 168 mm

This work is about

  • Person

  • Subject

Acquisition and rights

Documentation

Persistent URL

Questions?

Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!