Girl with an Oil Lamp at a Window

Gerrit Dou, c. 1660

Meisje met brandende olielamp, uit een venster geleund.

  • Artwork typepainting
  • Object numberSK-A-89
  • Dimensionsheight 18.8 cm x width 17.2 cm x thickness 0.7 cm, depth 3.5 cm
  • Physical characteristicsoil on panel

Gerrit Dou

Girl with an Oil Lamp at a Window

c. 1660

Inscriptions

  • signature, bottom centre (G and D ligated): GDov.

Technical notes

Support The single, vertically grained oak plank is approx. 0.5 cm thick. The once arched top was squared off at some point with corner pieces and wooden strips on the left and right (approx. 1 cm); another one was added at the bottom (approx. 0.5 cm). The reverse shows no trace of bevelling and has a gouge mark in the centre. Dendrochronology has shown that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1627. The plank could have been ready for use by 1638, but a date in or after 1644 is more likely.
Preparatory layers The single, light ground, which appears grey to the naked eye, does not extend over the edges of the support. It consists of white and transparent pigment particles.
Underdrawing No underdrawing could be detected with the naked eye or infrared photography.
Paint layers The paint does not extend over the edges of the support. The composition was built up from the back to the front and from dark to light, using reserves. A brown undermodelling has become visible in a few places, for example in the girl’s right hand where dark contours can be detected. The lit areas are smooth, opaque and carefully blended, with no evident brushwork. Minor changes were made during the painting process. The red in the right sleeve cuff, for instance, was applied on top of a blue layer.
Gwen Tauber, 2021


Scientific examination and reports

  • dendrochronology: P. Klein, RMA, 4 oktober 2005
  • infrared photography: G. Tauber, RMA, 31 augustus 2009
  • paint samples: G. Tauber, RMA, no. SK-A-89/1, 31 augustus 2009
  • technical report: G. Tauber, RMA, 31 augustus 2009

Condition

Fair. A strong, tight, circular drying crack pattern can be found throughout, especially in the hair and the flesh tones, where there are also deep drying craters. Pinpoint losses are present throughout, and the paint is abraded overall, which may account for the somewhat blurred look. There are a few disturbing retouchings along the lower edge.


Conservation

  • conservator unknown, 1874: varnish regenerated

Provenance

...; ? collection Hendrik van Heteren (1672-1749), The Hague;1See E.W. Moes and E. van Biema, De Nationale Konst-Gallery en het Koninklijk Museum, Amsterdam 1909, p. 192; T.L.J. Verroen, ‘‘Een verstandig ryk man’: De achttiende-eeuwse verzamelaar Adriaan Leonard van Heteren’, Leids Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 4 (1985), pp. 17-61, esp. p. 37. his son, Adriaan Leonard van Heteren (1724-1800), The Hague (‘Een Meisje, die een Lamp in de hand heeft, zynde een Kaarsligt, door denzelven, h. 12 d. br. 9 en drie vierde d. [31.4 x 25.5 cm] P.’);2‘Catalogus van Schilderyen, In’t Kabinet van den Heer Bewindhebber, Adriaan Leonard van Heteren, in ’s Hage’, in G. Hoet, Catalogus of naamlyst van schilderyen, met derzelver pryzen zedert een langen reeks van jaaren zoo in Holland als op andere plaatzen in het openbaar verkogt: Benevens een verzameling van lysten van verscheyden nog in wezen zynde cabinetten, II, The Hague 1752, pp. 451-62, esp. p. 454. Sluijter in E.J. Sluijter, M. Enklaar and P. Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Leidse fijnschilders: Van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630-1760, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal) 1988, p. 108, and R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5, suggest that the painting was in sale, Paul-Joseph Geelhand, Antwerp, 5 July 1784, no. 13, but that is ruled out by its presence in the Van Heteren collection. his third cousin and godson, Adriaan Leonard van Heteren Gevers (1794-1866), Rotterdam (‘Charmant tableau représentent une jeune fille une lampe à la main (bois. H. 8½ l. 6¾ [23 x 18.3 cm]’);3Catalogue raisonné d’une collection de tableaux appartenant à Monsieur A.L. Gevers, Page de Leurs Majestés le Roi et la Reine de Hollande 1808; transcr. in E.W. Moes and E. van Biema, De Nationale Konst-Gallery en het Koninklijk Museum, Amsterdam 1909, pp. 145-51, esp. p. 146, no. 25. from whom, with 136 other paintings (known as ‘Kabinet van Heteren Gevers’), fl. 100,000, to the museum, by decree of Louis Napoleon, King of Holland, and through the mediation of his father, Dirk Cornelis Gevers (1763-1839), 8 June 18094T.L.J. Verroen, ‘‘Een verstandig ryk man’: De achttiende-eeuwse verzamelaar Adriaan Leonard van Heteren’, Leids Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 4 (1985), pp. 17-61, esp. p. 17, notes 2, 3.

Object number: SK-A-89


The artist

Biography

Gerrit Dou (Leiden 1613 - Leiden 1675)

Jan Jansz Orlers, the Leiden town chronicler, states that Gerrit Dou was born in the city on 7 April 1613. His father, Douwe Jansz de Vries van Arentsveld, owned the second largest glassworks in Leiden, which he had taken over from the first husband of his wife Maria (Marijtgen) Jansdr van Rosenburg. According to Orlers, Dou studied drawing for 18 months with the Leiden engraver Bartholomeus Dolendo, before spending two years learning his father’s trade from the local glazier Pieter Couwenhorn. In 1625 and 1627 he and his brother Jan registered with the glaziers’ guild. However, Dou then switched to painting, and on 14 February 1628 he entered Rembrandt’s studio to begin a three-year apprenticeship. He became an independent master in Leiden around 1631 and made his name with an oeuvre comprising tronies, portraits, self-portraits, genre scenes and a few still lifes. He joined the local Guild of St Luke in 1648 as an ensign, a rank within the civic guard that was reserved for bachelors. Records show that he paid his annual dues to the guild in 1649-51, 1658-68 and 1673-74. Dou was buried in the Pieterskerk in Leiden in the week of 9-15 February 1675.

In 1642, in his address to the artists of Leiden, Philips Angel singled out Dou, ‘for whom no praise is sufficient’, as an exemplary painter. Other contemporary writers laud his astonishing illusionism and speak of his meticulous and time-consuming manner of working. Dou had a few very good customers, and his pictures found their way into collections in Leiden and elsewhere. Pieter Spiering, an ambassador for Sweden, paid him 500 guilders a year for first refusal of all his works. He bought several for Queen Christina of Sweden, although she returned 11 of them in 1652. In May 1660 Dou was commissioned to make three paintings as part of the gift from the States of Holland to King Charles II to congratulate him on regaining the crown of England. Dou was also responsible for putting that ‘Dutch Gift’ together, and may have been invited to paint at the English court. Another important patron was Johan de Bye of Leiden, who exhibited no fewer than 29 works by Dou in 1665-66. The Leiden professor François de le Boë Silvius left at least 11 pictures by Dou on his death. The wealth he gained from his art can be gauged from Von Sandrart’s remark that people were prepared to pay 600 to 1,000 guilders or more for a painting. Dou’s international clientele included Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria and Cosimo III de’ Medici, who paid a visit to his studio in 1669 and commissioned a self-portrait. The Delft patrician Pieter Tedingh van Berckhout, the Danish scholar Ole Borch and the French diplomat Balthasar de Monconys also came calling.

Dou’s earliest known signed and dated work is An Interior with a Young Viola Player of 1637, but by then he had already been active for some years as an artist.5Edinburgh, Scottish National Gallery; illustrated in A.K. Wheelock Jr (ed.), Gerrit Dou 1613-1675: Master Painter in the Age of Rembrandt, exh. cat. Washington (National Gallery of Art)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery)/The Hague (Mauritshuis) 2000-01, p. 79, no. 8. Among his latest dated pictures are The Grocer’s Shop6England, Royal Collection; illustrated in A.K. Wheelock Jr (ed.), Gerrit Dou 1613-1675: Master Painter in the Age of Rembrandt, exh. cat. Washington (National Gallery of Art)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery)/The Hague (Mauritshuis) 2000-01, p. 135, no. 35. and The Dentist,7Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in W. Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, I, Landau/Pfalz 1983, p. 594, no. 297. both of 1672. Dou was the founding father of the Leiden fijnschilders and influenced or taught many local painters. In the early 1640s they probably included Gabriel Metsu, Johan van Staveren, Abraham de Pape and Adriaen van Gaesbeeck. His most talented pupil in the early 1650s was Frans van Mieris, and he was followed in the 1660s by Gerrit Maes, Bartholomeus Maton, Matthijs Naiveu, Godefridus Schalcken, Pieter van Slingelandt and Domenicus van Tol. Carel de Moor (1655-1738) was one of Dou’s last apprentices.

Gerbrand Korevaar, 2026

References
J.J. Orlers, Beschrijving der stad Leyden, Leiden 1641, pp. 377-80; P. Angel, Lof der Schilderkonst, Leiden 1642 – trans. M. Hoyle and annot. H. Miedema, ‘Philips Angel, Praise of Painting’, Simiolus 24 (1996), pp. 227-58, esp. pp. 238, 248-49; S. van Leeuwen, Korte besgryving van het Lugdunum Batavorum, nu Leyden: Vervatende een verhaal van haar grond-stand, oudheid, opkomst, voort-gang, ende stads-bestier: Sampt het graven van den Ouden ende Niewen Rijn, met de oude ende niewe uytwateringen van de selve, Leiden 1672, p. 191; J. von Sandrart, Academie der Bau-, Bild- und Mahlerey-Künste von 1675: Leben der berühmten Maler, Bildhauer und Baumeister, ed. A.R. Peltzer, Munich 1925 (ed. princ. Nuremberg 1675), pp. 195-96; A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, II, Amsterdam 1719, pp. 1-7; C. Kramm, De levens en werken der Hollandsche en Vlaamsche kunstschilders, beeldhouwers, graveurs en bouwmeesters: Van den vroegsten tot op onzen tijd, I, Amsterdam 1857, pp. 359-65; F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis: Verzameling van meerendeels onuitgegeven berichten en mededeelingen betreffende Nederlandsche schilders, plaatsnijders, beeldhouwers, bouwmeesters, juweliers, goud- en zilverdrijvers [enz.], V, Rotterdam 1882-83, pp. 178, 198, 259; A. Bredius, ‘Een en ander omtrent G. Dou’, in ibid., pp. 26-30; W. Martin, Het leven en de werken van Gerrit Dou beschouwd in verband met het schildersleven van zijn tijd, diss., Leiden University 1901, pp. 17-83, 166-73 (documents); Martin in U. Thieme and F. Becker (eds.), Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, IX, Leipzig 1913, pp. 503-05; Sluijter in E.J. Sluijter, M. Enklaar and P. Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Leidse fijnschilders: Van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630-1760, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal) 1988, p. 96; R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, I, pp. 2-9; R. Baer, ‘The Life and Art of Gerrit Dou’, in A.K. Wheelock Jr (ed.), Gerrit Dou 1613-1675: Master Painter in the Age of Rembrandt, exh. cat. Washington (National Gallery of Art)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery)/The Hague (Mauritshuis) 2000-01, pp. 26-52, esp. pp. 28-33; Beaujean in Saur Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon: Die Bildenden Künstler aller Zeiten und Völker, XXIX, Munich/Leipzig 2001, pp. 176-80


Entry

At the beginning of the 1650s Gerrit Dou embarked on a series of genre paintings in which the light comes from an artificial source such as a candle or an oil lamp – a speciality that was already being praised by his contemporaries.8S. van Hoogstraten, Inleyding tot de hooge schoole der schilderkonst: Anders de zichtbaere werelt: Verdeelt in negen leerwinkels, Rotterdam 1678, p. 268. On Dou’s nocturnes see Naumann in P.C. Sutton et al., Masters of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Genre Painting, exh. cat. Philadelphia (Philadelphia Museum of Art)/Berlin (Gemäldegalerie)/London (Royal Academy of Arts) 1984, pp. 187-88; M. Neumeister, Das Nachtstück mit Kunstlicht in der niederländischen Malerei und Graphik des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts: Ikonographische und koloristische Aspekte, Petersberg 2003, pp. 327-39. One specific type within this group features a young woman leaning forward whose face is illuminated by the glow from a light source, which may be only partially visible, that she holds in her extended hand. As far as we know, the first of these scenes is from 1656.9Present whereabouts unknown, formerly Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, p. 159, who read the last digit as a ‘6’. Dou repeated the subject up until the 1660s. Martin assigned the Rijksmuseum picture to Dou’s latest works from around 1670,10W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, p. 156. but Baer dated it more accurately to around 1660, when Dou produced several comparable versions.11R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5. Compare, for example, those in Copenhagen, Statens Museum for Kunst (1657-58), formerly Munich, Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, Alte Pinakothek (1658), and Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum (c. 1660); illustrated in W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, pp. 158, 154, 153 respectively.

The superb three-dimensional effect of the painting derives from the girl’s pose as she leans forward, the spouted oil lamp extended towards the viewer,12See W.G. Hartstra, ‘Olielampen’, Antiek 4 (1969), pp. 315-25, esp. p. 315, for this type of lamp. and the ingenious play of light and shadow on the window frame. Her expectant look, which led to the work being called The Inquisitive Girl for a long time,13W. Martin, Het leven en de werken van Gerrit Dou beschouwd in verband met het schildersleven van zijn tijd, diss., Leiden University 1901, p. 236, no. 326. is directed towards someone outside the picture. Sluijter interpreted the scene in an erotic sense because of the burning lamp, which, like a candle, was an object that could have sexual implications in the hands of young women.14Sluijter in E.J. Sluijter, M. Enklaar and P. Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Leidse fijnschilders: Van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630-1760, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal) 1988, p. 109. See also U. Kleinmann, Rahmen und Gerahmtes: Das Spiel mit Darstellung und Bedeutung: Eine Untersuchung des illusionistischen Rahmenmotivs im Oeuvre Gerrit Dous, Frankfurt 1996, p. 118. The clothing identifies the girl as a maidservant, a class of person described in several seventeenth-century writings as a seductress and embodiment of lasciviousness.15S. Schama, The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age, London 1987, pp. 454-60. Two figures and a candle on a table can vaguely be seen behind her on the left. Dou’s Girl at a Window with a Lantern in Vienna has people playing cards in the background,16Kunsthistorisches Museum; illustrated in R. Trnek, Die holländischen Gemälde des 17. Jahrhunderts in der Gemäldegalerie der Akademie der bildenden Künste in Wien, coll. cat. Vienna 1992, pl. 547, no. 583. and the Rijksmuseum painting may have a similar scene there which has become very difficult to make out.17That background is more clearly visible in the print after the Vienna painting by Gerard Valck; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts ca. 1450-1700, XXXI, Amsterdam 1987, p. 88, no. 43. R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5, wrongly states that the print was made after the Rijksmuseum painting. In this context it would be an allusion to a brothel or inn, reinforcing the erotic nature of the picture.

The painting is in poor condition. In addition to the barely legible background there is little left to be seen of a two-branched chandelier hanging above the girl or of a curtain across the top of the interior. The work was recorded with the larger measurements of 31.4 x 25.5 centimetres in the Van Heteren Gevers collection in 1752, but in its catalogue of 1808 the picture was considerably smaller at 23 x 18.3 centimetres.18See Provenance. Its present size is 18.8 x 17.2 cm. The lack of bevelling confirms that the panel was cut down in the interim. It cannot be ruled out, however, that the arched top, which was later made square, is original.19Note RMA. That is also assumed by R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5. Dou regularly used that format, as in his Girl with a Candle of 1657-58 in Copenhagen.20Statens Museum for Kunst; illustrated in W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, p. 158.

Gerbrand Korevaar, 2026

See Key to abbreviations, Rijksmuseum painting catalogues and Acknowledgements


Literature

J. Smith, A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch, Flemish and French Painters, I, London 1829, p. 7, no. 14; W. Martin, Het leven en de werken van Gerrit Dou beschouwd in verband met het schildersleven van zijn tijd, diss., Leiden University 1901, p. 236, no. 326; C. Hofstede de Groot, Beschreibendes und kritisches Verzeichnis der Werke der hervorragendsten holländischen Maler des XVII. Jahrhunderts, I, Esslingen/Paris 1907, p. 415, no. 227; Sluijter in E.J. Sluijter, M. Enklaar and P. Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Leidse fijnschilders: Van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630-1760, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal) 1988, pp. 108-09; R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, pp. 79.5, 80.6, no. 80


Collection catalogues

1809, p. 19, no. 76; 1853, p. 9, no. 67 (fl. 1,500); 1858, p. 29, no. 65; 1880, p. 86, no. 75; 1887, p. 36, no. 278; 1903, p. 84, no. 796; 1934, p. 84, no. 796; 1960, p. 85, no. 796; 1976, p. 198, no. A 89


Citation

Gerbrand Korevaar, 2026, 'Gerrit Dou, Girl with an Oil Lamp at a Window, c. 1660', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20027801

(accessed 28 January 2026 18:07:45).

Footnotes

  • 1See E.W. Moes and E. van Biema, De Nationale Konst-Gallery en het Koninklijk Museum, Amsterdam 1909, p. 192; T.L.J. Verroen, ‘‘Een verstandig ryk man’: De achttiende-eeuwse verzamelaar Adriaan Leonard van Heteren’, Leids Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 4 (1985), pp. 17-61, esp. p. 37.
  • 2‘Catalogus van Schilderyen, In’t Kabinet van den Heer Bewindhebber, Adriaan Leonard van Heteren, in ’s Hage’, in G. Hoet, Catalogus of naamlyst van schilderyen, met derzelver pryzen zedert een langen reeks van jaaren zoo in Holland als op andere plaatzen in het openbaar verkogt: Benevens een verzameling van lysten van verscheyden nog in wezen zynde cabinetten, II, The Hague 1752, pp. 451-62, esp. p. 454. Sluijter in E.J. Sluijter, M. Enklaar and P. Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Leidse fijnschilders: Van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630-1760, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal) 1988, p. 108, and R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5, suggest that the painting was in sale, Paul-Joseph Geelhand, Antwerp, 5 July 1784, no. 13, but that is ruled out by its presence in the Van Heteren collection.
  • 3Catalogue raisonné d’une collection de tableaux appartenant à Monsieur A.L. Gevers, Page de Leurs Majestés le Roi et la Reine de Hollande 1808; transcr. in E.W. Moes and E. van Biema, De Nationale Konst-Gallery en het Koninklijk Museum, Amsterdam 1909, pp. 145-51, esp. p. 146, no. 25.
  • 4T.L.J. Verroen, ‘‘Een verstandig ryk man’: De achttiende-eeuwse verzamelaar Adriaan Leonard van Heteren’, Leids Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 4 (1985), pp. 17-61, esp. p. 17, notes 2, 3.
  • 5Edinburgh, Scottish National Gallery; illustrated in A.K. Wheelock Jr (ed.), Gerrit Dou 1613-1675: Master Painter in the Age of Rembrandt, exh. cat. Washington (National Gallery of Art)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery)/The Hague (Mauritshuis) 2000-01, p. 79, no. 8.
  • 6England, Royal Collection; illustrated in A.K. Wheelock Jr (ed.), Gerrit Dou 1613-1675: Master Painter in the Age of Rembrandt, exh. cat. Washington (National Gallery of Art)/London (Dulwich Picture Gallery)/The Hague (Mauritshuis) 2000-01, p. 135, no. 35.
  • 7Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in W. Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, I, Landau/Pfalz 1983, p. 594, no. 297.
  • 8S. van Hoogstraten, Inleyding tot de hooge schoole der schilderkonst: Anders de zichtbaere werelt: Verdeelt in negen leerwinkels, Rotterdam 1678, p. 268. On Dou’s nocturnes see Naumann in P.C. Sutton et al., Masters of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Genre Painting, exh. cat. Philadelphia (Philadelphia Museum of Art)/Berlin (Gemäldegalerie)/London (Royal Academy of Arts) 1984, pp. 187-88; M. Neumeister, Das Nachtstück mit Kunstlicht in der niederländischen Malerei und Graphik des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts: Ikonographische und koloristische Aspekte, Petersberg 2003, pp. 327-39.
  • 9Present whereabouts unknown, formerly Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, p. 159, who read the last digit as a ‘6’.
  • 10W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, p. 156.
  • 11R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5. Compare, for example, those in Copenhagen, Statens Museum for Kunst (1657-58), formerly Munich, Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, Alte Pinakothek (1658), and Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum (c. 1660); illustrated in W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, pp. 158, 154, 153 respectively.
  • 12See W.G. Hartstra, ‘Olielampen’, Antiek 4 (1969), pp. 315-25, esp. p. 315, for this type of lamp.
  • 13W. Martin, Het leven en de werken van Gerrit Dou beschouwd in verband met het schildersleven van zijn tijd, diss., Leiden University 1901, p. 236, no. 326.
  • 14Sluijter in E.J. Sluijter, M. Enklaar and P. Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Leidse fijnschilders: Van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630-1760, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal) 1988, p. 109. See also U. Kleinmann, Rahmen und Gerahmtes: Das Spiel mit Darstellung und Bedeutung: Eine Untersuchung des illusionistischen Rahmenmotivs im Oeuvre Gerrit Dous, Frankfurt 1996, p. 118.
  • 15S. Schama, The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age, London 1987, pp. 454-60.
  • 16Kunsthistorisches Museum; illustrated in R. Trnek, Die holländischen Gemälde des 17. Jahrhunderts in der Gemäldegalerie der Akademie der bildenden Künste in Wien, coll. cat. Vienna 1992, pl. 547, no. 583.
  • 17That background is more clearly visible in the print after the Vienna painting by Gerard Valck; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts ca. 1450-1700, XXXI, Amsterdam 1987, p. 88, no. 43. R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5, wrongly states that the print was made after the Rijksmuseum painting.
  • 18See Provenance. Its present size is 18.8 x 17.2 cm.
  • 19Note RMA. That is also assumed by R. Baer, The Paintings of Gerrit Dou (1613-1675), diss., New York University 1990, II, p. 79.5.
  • 20Statens Museum for Kunst; illustrated in W. Martin, Gerard Dou: Des Meisters Gemälde in 247 Abbildunge, Stuttgart/Berlin 1913, p. 158.