Getting started with the collection:
Young Man Eating Porridge
Jan Smeltzing (I), c. 1690 - c. 1710
- Artwork typesculpture
- Object numberBK-NM-5347
- Dimensionsheight 29.5 cm x width 18 cm x depth 17 cm
- Physical characteristicsterracotta
Discover more
Identification
Title(s)
Young Man Eating Porridge
Object type
Object number
BK-NM-5347
Inscriptions / marks
- inscription, on the figure’s breastplate, incised in the wet clay: ‘Voor ‘t Quijle’
- monogram, front right along the raised edge of the base, incised in the wet clay: ‘JS’
Part of catalogue
Creation
Creation
sculptor: Jan Smeltzing (I), Leiden
Dating
c. 1690 - c. 1710
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
terracotta
Dimensions
height 29.5 cm x width 18 cm x depth 17 cm
Acquisition and rights
Acquisition
purchase 1881
Copyright
Provenance
…; ? sale collection Mr. Leonard van Heemskerk, Leiden (P. Delfos), 2 September 1771, no. 20;{T.H. Lunsingh Scheurleer et al., _Het Rapenburg: Geschiedenis van een Leidse gracht_, Leiden 1992, vol. 6a, p. 137} …; from M. de Maan, The Hague, with BK-NM-5346, fl. 40 for both, to the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague, 1881; to Amsterdam 1883; to the museum 1885
Documentation
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!
Jan Smeltzing (I)
Young Man Eating Porridge
Leiden, c. 1690 - c. 1710
Inscriptions
- monogram, front right along the raised edge of the base, incised in the wet clay:JS
- inscription, on the figure’s breastplate, incised in the wet clay:Voor ‘t Quijle(against the drooling)
Technical notes
Modelled in the round and fired. Coated with a greyish-yellow finishing layer.
Condition
Much of the spoon is missing. The right hand and right slipper have possibly been restored.
Provenance
…; ? sale collection Mr. Leonard van Heemskerk, Leiden (P. Delfos), 2 September 1771, no. 20;1T.H. Lunsingh Scheurleer et al., Het Rapenburg: Geschiedenis van een Leidse gracht, Leiden 1992, vol. 6a, p. 137 …; from M. de Maan, The Hague, with BK-NM-5346, fl. 40 for both, to the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague, 1881; to Amsterdam 1883; to the museum 1885
Object number: BK-NM-5347
Entry
This statuette was purchased in 1883 together with a terracotta of a Young Woman with a Lamb (BK-NM-5346) from one M. de Maan of The Hague. The statuette with the lamb bears the signature J: Smeltzing Leide, unlike the present terracotta, which is signed with the monogram JS. Both sculptures were clearly modelled by same hand, with authorship to be credited to one of two possible Leiden sculptors: Johannes (‘Jan’) Arendsz Smeltzing (1668- after 1732), or his older cousin by twelve years, Johannes (also known as ‘Jan I’) Quirijnsz Smeltzing (1656-1693).2It turns out that the ‘Jan III Schmeltzing’ cited by Leeuwenberg (Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, p. 334) and others, who died in Leiden in the year 1703, never existed, see correspondence W. Halsema-Kubes to J.S. Turner, 9 February 1990 and W.I.C. Rammelman Elsevier, ‘De Smeltzingen’, De Navorscher 10 (1860), pp. 246-49, esp. pp. 246-47. Both men received their training from Arend Smeltzing, a coat of arms engraver and the father of the younger cousin. While Jan Arendsz succeeded his father as municipal coat of arms engraver, in practice his activity appears to have been limited to the carving of basic stamps used for wax and lead seals.3W. Fock, et al., Leids zilver, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) 1977, p. 105. By contrast, Jan Quirijnsz stands out as one of the most renowned Dutch medallists of the seventeenth century.4W. Fock, et al., Leids zilver, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) 1977, pp. 106-07. Given his presumably superior skill in the modelling of clay, the elder of the two cousins emerges as the most likely sculptor of the two statuettes. Both terracottas were conceived, not as models, but as independent works of art, a conclusion affirmed by the high level of finishing and the inscribed signatures.
It has previously been suggested that the terracottas, both of equal height measuring 29 centimetres, are pendants of one another, the young woman (a shepherdess?) embodies sweetness and the porridge-eater repulsiveness.5J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, p. 250. The notion that the two sculptures once formed an ensemble, however, seems highly improbable, if only when acknowledging the marked difference in the form of the plinths. Furthermore, while the iconographic theme of a young woman with the lamb does have a traditional basis, namely that of Humilitas (Humility);6Cesare Ripa, Iconologia, of uytbeeldingen des verstands, Amsterdam 1644, p. 391. the porridge-eating boy, by contrast, is the sculptor’s own invention. Had the sculptures been conceived as an ensemble, the pendant of the young woman would logically be a personification of Superbia (Arrogance), the standard pairing with Humilitas. In fact, only one of the two works appears in the catalogue accompanying the sale of Leonard van Heemskerk’s estate in 1771: ‘A woman playing with a Lamb on her lap, by the same [J. Smeltzing], height 11 ½ thumbs.7Een vrouwtje speelende met een Schaapje op haar schoot, door denzelven (J. Smeltzing), hoog 11 ½ duim. Sale collection Leonard van Heemskerk, Leiden (P. Delfos), 2 September 1771, p. 14, no. 17. The terracotta was sold, not with a young man eating porridge, but together with ‘A Gallanting Man and Woman, by J. Smeltzing, height 12 ½ duim for f. 5.5’, further belying a purported thematic link between the young man and the girl.8Een Galantriserend Mannetje en Vrouwtje, door J. Smeltzing, hoog 12 ½ duim voor f. 5.5. Sale collection Leonard van Heemskerk, Leiden (P. Delfos), 2 September 1771, p. 14, no. 18.
The catalogue for Van Heemskerk’s sale featured no less than six terracottas signed by Smeltzing and an additional eight works by Pieter Xaveri (c. 1647-1673), a native of Antwerp active in Leiden from 1670 up to his premature death in 1673. In various ways, Smeltzing’s sculptures are highly similar to those of Xaveri.9E. Neurdenburg, De zeventiende eeuwsche beeldhouwkunst in de noordelijke Nederlanden: Hendrick de Keyser, Artus Quellinus, Rombout Verhulst en tijdgenooten, Amsterdam 1948, p. 242. The latter’s terracottas were also conceived as independent cabinet pieces, a genre new to the Northern Netherlands at this time. The two sculptors also favoured the same kinds of subjects, in Xaveri’s case, ranging from commonplace humour to sweetly allegorical themes. The visual motif of the overturned wicker basket on which Smeltzing’s porridge-eating boy sits was perhaps even directly derived from Xaveri’s Two Laughing Jesters (BK-NM-5667) or his Hurdy-Gurdy Player (BK-1978-36). Moreover, Smeltzing’s young woman feeding rose petals to the lamb at her side corresponds thematically with Xaveri’s Flora (BK-NM-5155).10A. Staring, ‘De beeldhouwer Pieter Xavery’, Oud Holland 44 (1927), pp. 1-15, esp. p. 5. Undoubtedly, Smeltzing was very familiar with Xaveri’s work, perhaps even in the capacity of an apprentice. Around 1673, Xaveri was commissioned for a number of major projects in Leiden, including the sculptural decoration on two tympanums of buildings in the city. By that time, Smeltzing was precisely old enough (14-17 years) to have been among the sculptor’s pupils.
Bieke van der Mark, 2025
Literature
J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, no. 334b, with earlier literature
Citation
B. van der Mark, 2025, 'Jan (I) Smeltzing, Young Man Eating Porridge, Leiden, c. 1690 - c. 1710', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20035778
(accessed 9 December 2025 16:42:54).Footnotes
- 1T.H. Lunsingh Scheurleer et al., Het Rapenburg: Geschiedenis van een Leidse gracht, Leiden 1992, vol. 6a, p. 137
- 2It turns out that the ‘Jan III Schmeltzing’ cited by Leeuwenberg (Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, p. 334) and others, who died in Leiden in the year 1703, never existed, see correspondence W. Halsema-Kubes to J.S. Turner, 9 February 1990 and W.I.C. Rammelman Elsevier, ‘De Smeltzingen’, De Navorscher 10 (1860), pp. 246-49, esp. pp. 246-47.
- 3W. Fock, et al., Leids zilver, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) 1977, p. 105.
- 4W. Fock, et al., Leids zilver, exh. cat. Leiden (Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) 1977, pp. 106-07.
- 5J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, p. 250.
- 6Cesare Ripa, Iconologia, of uytbeeldingen des verstands, Amsterdam 1644, p. 391.
- 7Een vrouwtje speelende met een Schaapje op haar schoot, door denzelven (J. Smeltzing), hoog 11 ½ duim. Sale collection Leonard van Heemskerk, Leiden (P. Delfos), 2 September 1771, p. 14, no. 17.
- 8Een Galantriserend Mannetje en Vrouwtje, door J. Smeltzing, hoog 12 ½ duim voor f. 5.5. Sale collection Leonard van Heemskerk, Leiden (P. Delfos), 2 September 1771, p. 14, no. 18.
- 9E. Neurdenburg, De zeventiende eeuwsche beeldhouwkunst in de noordelijke Nederlanden: Hendrick de Keyser, Artus Quellinus, Rombout Verhulst en tijdgenooten, Amsterdam 1948, p. 242.
- 10A. Staring, ‘De beeldhouwer Pieter Xavery’, Oud Holland 44 (1927), pp. 1-15, esp. p. 5.











