View of the Temple of Vesta at Tivoli

Italianiserend landschap.

  • Artwork typedrawing
  • Object numberRP-T-1998-87
  • Dimensionsheight 164 mm x width 252 mm
  • Physical characteristicsgrey wash, with point of brush and grey and black ink, over black chalk; framing line in brown ink (partly trimmed)

View of the Temple of Vesta at Tivoli

Inscriptions

  • stamped on verso: lower centre, with the mark of the museum (L. 2228a)


Technical notes

watermark: coat of arms with a cardinal's hat; cf. Heawood, no. 789 (Rome: 1646)


Condition

Slight foxing


Provenance

…; ? sale, Isaac Walraven (1686-1765, Amsterdam), Amsterdam (H. de Winter), 14 October 1765, Album M, no. 696 (‘J. Asselyn, alias Krabbetje. Een gezicht van den Tempel te Tivoli, met Oostind. Inkt gewassen.’), fl. 10;1Copy RKD. …; ? anonymous sale, Haarlem (A. Vermande et al.), 6 May 1811 sqq., Album A, no. 53 (‘Twee stuks, een oude Tempel met O.I. door Asselyn en een Landschap door V.L. Vinne’), with nos. 51-52, fl. 6 for all three, to ‘Claterbos’;2RKDexcerpts. …; ? anonymous sale, Amsterdam (J. Nepveu and A. Zalm), 3 April 1837 sqq., Album U, no. 1 (‘De Ruine van eene Romeinsche tempel, door J. Asselijn’), fl. 4:25:-, to ‘Hulswit’;3Copy RKD. …; ? sale, Adriaan van der Willigen (1766-1841, Rotterdam and Haarlem) and Dr Adriaan van der Willigen Pz (1810-1876, Haarlem), The Hague (A.G. de Visser), 7 October 1874, no. 4, fl. 2, to ‘W’ (?);4Copy RKD.; …; from Michael Miller Lucy Vivante Fine Arts Inc., New York, $4,400, to the museum (L. 2228), 1998

Object number: RP-T-1998-87


The artist

Biography

Jan Asselijn (Dieppe c. 1614 - Amsterdam 1652)

In 1631 the Huguenot Abraham Asselin (1609-1697), a maker of gold wire, stated that he had been living in Amsterdam for ten years and that his parents were dead. He had three brothers living in the city: the painter Jan, the poet Thomas Asselin (c. 1620-1701) and Steven Asselin (?-?). They were from Dieppe in Normandy and were members of the local Walloon Congregation. Jan’s date of birth is not known, but it must have been around or just before 1614, because his earliest painting is from 1634 and he would not have signed as an independent master before he was twenty.

Nothing is known for certain about his training, but possible teachers were Esaias van de Velde (1587-1630) and Van de Velde’s nephew Jan Martszen II (c. 1609-after 1647), who was living in Amsterdam in 1633. Asselijn followed their example by specializing in cavalry battles, many of them illustrating episodes from the Thirty Years’ War. There are at least five dated works from 1634 and 1635 representing Gustav Adolf at the Battle of Lützen, 16 November 1632, including one from 1634 in the Herzog Anton-Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig (inv. no. GG 348),5A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, no. 7. one from 1635 in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin (inv. no. 1581),6Ibid., no. 8. and another from 1635 that appeared on the Cologne art market in 2016.7Sale, Cologne (Lempertz), 19 May 2016 sqq., no. 1261. Asselijn was still documented in Amsterdam at the end of 1635, but he must have left for Rome shortly afterwards, where he joined the Bentvueghels artists’ society and was nicknamed Crabbetje (‘Little Crab’) because of his deformed hand. According to Baldinucci, he also spent some time in Florence, where he befriended the French artist Jacques Courtois (1621-1676). He was probably in Venice as well, where there were several of his works, according to Von Sandrart.

While in Rome, Asselijn came under the influence of Pieter van Laer (1599-1642), who returned to the Netherlands in 1639, and possibly also that of the brothers Andries Both (1611/12-1642) and Jan Both (1618/22-1652), who lived there until 1641. It is not known when Asselijn returned home, but on the way he certainly paused for a while in Lyon, where he married Antoinette Houwaart [Huaart] (?-after 1652), an Antwerp merchant’s daughter, around 1644-45. Houwaart’s older sister married the Nijmegen painter Nicolaes van Helt Stockade (1614-1699) at around the same time. In 1645 both painters and their wives travelled to Paris, where Asselijn, Herman van Swanevelt (1603/04-1655) and others painted several landscapes for the hôtel particulier of the financier Nicolas Lambert (?-1648) on the Île Saint-Louis, including Asselijn’s three canvases now preserved in the Musée du Louvre, Paris (inv. nos. 984, 985 and 986).8A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, nos. 217, 125 and 44. While he was in Paris, Asselijn also made designs for three print suites etched and marketed by Gabriel Perelle (1604-1677), based on first-hand sketches made in Italy.9For the final preparatory drawings, see A.C. Steland, Die Zeichnungen des Jan Asselijn, Fridingen 1989, pp. 29-47; for the etchings by Perelle, see Hollstein, I (1947), nos. 15-32. The Paris interlude did not last long, for in August 1646 Willem Schellinks (1623-1678) and Lambert Doomer (1624-1700) looked for Asselijn and Van Helt Stockade there, only to discover that they and their families already had left for home. The two couples travelled by way of Antwerp, where Van Helt Stockade is documented in the autumn of 1646. Asselijn is first recorded back in Amsterdam on 14 April 1647. From 1650, he adopted a Dutch spelling of his surname, and he became a citizen of the city in 1652. He made his will on 28 September that year and was buried in the Nieuwezijds Kapel five days later.

Although there are drawings by Asselijn on paper with Italian watermarks, presumed to have been executed by him in Italy, there are very few dated paintings from his period in Italy and France (1636-46). He produced little apart from Italianate landscapes after his return, the only exceptions being a couple of animal pieces and a few history scenes, such as the breach of the St Anthony’s Dike near Diemen in March 1651, one depiction of which is in the Rijksmuseum (inv. no. SK-A-5030),10A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, no. 227. and the dike’s rebuilding in 1652, as seen in a painting in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin (inv. no. 58.2).11Ibid., no. 231. In 1647-49 he collaborated at least once with Jan-Baptist Weenix (1621-1659), with whom he jointly signed the Seaport with a High Tower in the Akademie der bildenden Künste, Vienna (inv. no. 761).12A.A. van Wagenberg-Ter Hoeven, Jan Weenix: The Paintings: Master of the Dutch Hunting Still Life, Zwolle 2018, no. 150 (fig. 298). In 1647-48 Rembrandt (1606-1669) etched Asselijn’s portrait as a gentleman posing at his easel (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-553). Asselijn’s last known works are from 1652: the abovementioned Repair of the St Anthony’s Dike in Berlin; Italianate Landscape with a Horse Drinking from a Spring, whose present whereabouts are unknown;13A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, no. 48. and View of Rome with the Ponte Rotte, whose date was discovered when it appeared on the New York art market in 2010.14Ibid., no. 179; sale, New York (Sotheby’s), 28 January 2010, no. 159. Houbraken says that Frederic de Moucheron I (1633-1686) was apprenticed to Asselijn. No other pupils are known, but he certainly had a great influence, among others, on Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683), as well as on Schellinks, who may have secured drawings and other works from his studio estate.

E. de Groot, 2011

References
J. von Sandrart, Joachim von Sandrarts Academie der Bau-, Bild- und Mahlerey-Ku¨nste von 1675: Leben der beru¨hmten Maler, Bildhauer und Baumeister, Nuremburg 1675; ed. and commentary by A.R. Peltzer, Munich 1925, pp. 182, 258-60; F. Baldinucci, Notizie dei professori del disegno da Cimabue in qua, 6 vols., Florence 1681-1728; facs. edn. of I-V ed. by F. Ranalli, Florence 1845-47 (reprinted 1974), VI-VII ed. by P. Barocchi, Florence 1975, IV (1686/ed. 1974), p. 331, V (1728/ed. 1974), p. 205; A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 327, III (1721), pp. 64-65; P. Scheltema, Rembrand: Redevoering over het leven en de verdiensten van Rembrand van Rijn, met eene menigte geschiedkundige bijlagen meerendeels uit echter bronnen geput, Amsterdam 1853, p. 69; A. Bredius, ‘Het schildersregister van Jan Sysmus, stads-doctor van Amsterdam’, Oud Holland 8 (1890), pp. 231-32; H. Gerson, Ausbreitung und Nachwirkung der holländischen Malerei des 17. Jahrhunderts, Amsterdam 1942, pp. 50-51; A. Blankert, Nederlandse 17e eeuwse Italianiserende landschapschilders, exh. cat. Utrecht (Centraal Museum) 1965 (rev. edn. as Nederlandse 17e eeuwse Italianiserende landschapschilders/Dutch 17th-century Italianate Landscape Painters, Soest 1978), pp. 129-31; M.J.E. Spits-Sanders, ‘Abraham Asselijn’, Maandblad Amstelodamum 63 (1976), pp. 109-11; A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971 (documents); A.C. Steland-Stief, Die Zeichnungen des Jan Asselijn, Fridingen, 1989; A.C. Steland-Stief, ‘Jan Asselijn’, in D.A. Levine and E. Mai et al., I Bamboccianti: Niederländische Malerrebellen im Rom des Barock, exh. cat. Cologne (Wallraf-Richartz-Museum)/Utrecht (Centraal Museum) 1991-92, p. 114; A.C. Steland-Stief, ‘Jan Asselijn’, in A. Beyer et al. (eds.), Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon: Die bildenden Künstler aller Zeiten und Völker, Munich 1992-, V (1992), pp. 458-59; A.C. Steland, ‘Jan Asselijn,’ in J. Turner (ed.), The Dictionary of Art, London/New York 1996, II, pp. 614-15 (2003 Grove online edn. at https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004627); J. Briels, Peintres flamands au berceau du sie`cle d’or hollandaise, 1585-1630, avec biographies en annexe, Antwerp 1997, p. 294


Entry

Although the peripteral temple surrounding a circular cella is often called the Temple of the Sibyl, strictly speaking, that name refers only to the attached rectangular temple over which the church of S. Giorgio was later built. The round structure is the Temple of Vesta. Built during the early 1st century BC, it was an iconic motif for foreign artists in Italy.

When the drawing surfaced after the publication of Charlotte Steland’s catalogue raisonné of the drawings of Jan Asselijn (1989), its authorship was the subject of some debate. The attribution to Asselijn is owed to Marijn Schapelhouman, whereas Steland herself, Martin Royalton-Kisch and George Keyes all favoured Thomas Wijck (c. 1616-1677) as the author.15Their opinions were recorded on the website of former dealer Michael Miller, http://oldmasterdrawings.net/2012/07/jan-asselijn-temple-sybil-tivoli/#.W0nOIi2ZPOQ. In support of Schapelhouman, the present sheet comes close stylistically to a drawing generally accepted as by Asselijn, the View of the Arco degli Argentari, Rome (348 x 265 mm) in Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam (inv. no. MB 296 (PK)).16P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, p. 104, fig. F. Although the present sheet is larger in format, it likewise combines broad and delicate brushwork that renders the vegetation by means of dense parallel hatching in both black chalk and wash.

As it was done on Italian paper and as it shows a contrast between passages that are carefully indicated (e.g. the crumbling stone and weathered plaster) and others that are less fully resolved, the Rijksmuseum’s View of Tivoli was probably drawn on the spot (for another small-format view by Asselijn perhaps made in situ, see inv. no. RP-T-1991-3).

Three other drawn versions of the Temple of Vesta are associated with Asselijn: the securely authentic design in the Istituto Nazionale per la Grafica, Gabinetto Nazionale delle Stampe, Rome (inv. no. FN 503),17J.C.N. Bruintjes and N. Köhler, Da Van Heemskerck a Van Wittel: Disegni fiamminghi e olandesi del XVI-XVII secolo dalle collezioni del Gabinetto dei Disegni e delle Stampe, exh. cat. ’s-Hertogenbosch (Noordbrabands Museum)/Rome (Gabinetto Nazionale delle Stampe) 1992-93, no. 51. later recorded in a print in the series by Gabriel Perelle (1604-1677) (for which see RP-T-1969-14);18The corresponding print by Perelle is inscribed Veue de Tivoly avec le temple de la Sibille Tiburtinne, revealing the long-standing confusion between the round-shaped Temple of Vesta and the once neighbouring Temple of the Sibyl, built on a rectangular ground plan (now the church of S. Giorgio). and (2)-(3) two closely related drawings in the Hessisches Landesmuseum, Darmstadt (inv. nos. AE 603 and AE 604), both of which bear old attributions to Jan Both, but have been accepted as by Asselijn.19Both in point of brush and brown ink, with brown wash, over black chalk, 375 x 249 mm and 377 x 255 mm, respectively; J. Simane and P. Märker, Landschaftszeichnungen der Niederländer: 16. und 17. Jahrhundert: aus der Graphischen Sammlung des Hessischen Landesmuseums Darmstadt, exh. cat. Darmstadt (Hessisches Landesmuseum) 1992, nos. 80 and 81; and A.C. Steland, Die Zeichnungen des Jan Asselijn, Fridingen 1989, nos. 50 and 51 (as ‘sicher zuschreibbar’ to Asselijn). From a stylistic point of view, however, it is hard to imagine that these two drawings as well as the present sheet were drawn on the spot by the same hand, even if we assume that there was a process from the present drawing showing the monument in its actual surroundings, with the adjoining church of S. Giorgio built on top of the remains of the Temple of the Sibyl, to the Darmstadt drawings isolating the Temple of Vesta from its medieval Christian annex.20The idea of such a process would have been supported by Asselijn’s print design of c. 1645-46 where the process of ‘editing’ or artistic license has been pushed still further by showing the monolith temple turned completely around, overlooking the torrents of the Anio. The fact that the Darmstadt drawings show a little fragment of a wall at upper left that is also visible in a version of the subject dated 1627 by Bartholomeus Breenbergh (1598-1657) in the Crocker Art Museum, Sacramento, CA (inv. no. 1871.155), as well as in earlier views of the site,21 but absent in the present drawing, may support such doubts. Rather, this difference in architectural detail points to different stages of decay. In an early eighteenth-century print by Hendrik Frans van Lint (1684-1763), this fragment is missing as well (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-9216. This may hint at a later date for the present drawing, perhaps made by an as yet unidentified late seventeenth- or early eighteenth-century artist.

Annemarie Stefes, 2018



Citation

(accessed 6 December 2025 16:20:41).

Footnotes

  • 1Copy RKD.
  • 2RKDexcerpts.
  • 3Copy RKD.
  • 4Copy RKD.
  • 5A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, no. 7.
  • 6Ibid., no. 8.
  • 7Sale, Cologne (Lempertz), 19 May 2016 sqq., no. 1261.
  • 8A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, nos. 217, 125 and 44.
  • 9For the final preparatory drawings, see A.C. Steland, Die Zeichnungen des Jan Asselijn, Fridingen 1989, pp. 29-47; for the etchings by Perelle, see Hollstein, I (1947), nos. 15-32.
  • 10A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, no. 227.
  • 11Ibid., no. 231.
  • 12A.A. van Wagenberg-Ter Hoeven, Jan Weenix: The Paintings: Master of the Dutch Hunting Still Life, Zwolle 2018, no. 150 (fig. 298).
  • 13A.C. Steland-Stief, Jan Asselijn (nach 1610-1652), Amsterdam 1971, no. 48.
  • 14Ibid., no. 179; sale, New York (Sotheby’s), 28 January 2010, no. 159.
  • 15Their opinions were recorded on the website of former dealer Michael Miller, http://oldmasterdrawings.net/2012/07/jan-asselijn-temple-sybil-tivoli/#.W0nOIi2ZPOQ.
  • 16P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, p. 104, fig. F.
  • 17J.C.N. Bruintjes and N. Köhler, Da Van Heemskerck a Van Wittel: Disegni fiamminghi e olandesi del XVI-XVII secolo dalle collezioni del Gabinetto dei Disegni e delle Stampe, exh. cat. ’s-Hertogenbosch (Noordbrabands Museum)/Rome (Gabinetto Nazionale delle Stampe) 1992-93, no. 51.
  • 18The corresponding print by Perelle is inscribed Veue de Tivoly avec le temple de la Sibille Tiburtinne, revealing the long-standing confusion between the round-shaped Temple of Vesta and the once neighbouring Temple of the Sibyl, built on a rectangular ground plan (now the church of S. Giorgio).
  • 19Both in point of brush and brown ink, with brown wash, over black chalk, 375 x 249 mm and 377 x 255 mm, respectively; J. Simane and P. Märker, Landschaftszeichnungen der Niederländer: 16. und 17. Jahrhundert: aus der Graphischen Sammlung des Hessischen Landesmuseums Darmstadt, exh. cat. Darmstadt (Hessisches Landesmuseum) 1992, nos. 80 and 81; and A.C. Steland, Die Zeichnungen des Jan Asselijn, Fridingen 1989, nos. 50 and 51 (as ‘sicher zuschreibbar’ to Asselijn).
  • 20The idea of such a process would have been supported by Asselijn’s print design of c. 1645-46 where the process of ‘editing’ or artistic license has been pushed still further by showing the monolith temple turned completely around, overlooking the torrents of the Anio.