View in the Vaults of a Classical Ruin

Guilliam du Gardijn, c. 1620 - c. 1625

  • Artwork typedrawing
  • Object numberRP-T-1895-A-3089(R)
  • Dimensionsheight 410 mm x width 552 mm
  • Physical characteristicsbrush and grey and brown wash, over black chalk

Guilliam du Gardijn

View in the Vaults of a Classical Ruin / verso: View in a Cave and View of a Classical Ruin

? Rome, c. 1620 - c. 1625

Inscriptions

  • signed and inscribed by the artist: lower right, in brown ink, G. du Jardijn. 30. st.

  • signed and inscribed on verso by the artist: lower left, in brown ink, G. du Jardijn. 30. ; upper left edge, in brown ink, G. du Jardijn. 1. gl: (upside down)


Technical notes

watermark: coat of arms with a kneeling pilgrim holding a cross; similar to Heawood, no. 1351 (Rome, c. 1607)


Condition

Light brown stains; a vertical crease in the centre of the sheet


Provenance

…; donated by Cornelis Willem Bruinvis (1829-1922), Alkmaar, to the museum (L. 2228), 1895

Object number: RP-T-1895-A-3089(R)

Credit line: Gift of C.W. Bruinvis, Alkmaar


The artist

Biography

Guilliam du Gardijn (Cologne, c. 1595/96 - Amsterdam, after 1647)

Little is known about the life of this artist – who was not related to Karel Dujardin (1626-1678), with whom he has often been confused. He was apparently born in Cologne and betrothed twice, first to Jannetgen Ysbrands (Leiden, ?-?) in Amsterdam on 18 March 1618, and again, after he had become a widower, to Annetje Vermou (?-?) on 3 November 1639.1A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aantekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten (II)’, Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 143. He was the teacher of the German painter Johann Heinrich Roos (1631-1685), probably around 1640.2H. Jedding, ‘Roos Family’ (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T073818; accessed 2 June 2020. He was still in Amsterdam in 1647 (when Roos was staying in his studio), but his whereabouts thereafter are unknown.3P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, p. 74.

A large part of his drawn oeuvre consists of views of Rome, but it is not known whether he ever visited Italy. If he were indeed there at some point, it might have been in the mid-1620s, as his work reveals the influence of fellow ‘first generation’ Dutch Italianates such as Cornelis van Poelenburch (1594-1667) and Bartholomeus Breenbergh (1598-1657).4Ibid. Du Gardijn’s Italian drawings are characterized by the free, almost casual way in which the buildings are sketched with the point of a half-dry brush over a cursory design in black chalk. His style is slightly reminiscent of Breenbergh's late Roman manner, with the difference that Breenbergh worked on smaller pieces of paper in his final years in Rome, whereas Du Gardijn appears to have preferred large sheets with Italian watermarks that were folded in the centre and drawn on both sides. He often sketched when seated on the ground, using a low vantage point. His drawings are signed with the initial G. (previously misread as a ‘C’), followed by du Jardin, Gardin, or Gardijn. He included price annotations on his drawings in guilders or stuivers, but the meaning of these prices is unclear.5Ibid.

Carolyn Mensing, 2020

References
U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, X (1910), p. 102 (as Dujardin (Du Jardin, Du Gardijn), Guilliam); H. Gerson, Ausbreitung und Nachwirkung der holländischen Malerei des 17. Jahrhunderts, Amsterdam 1942, p. 202 (as Julian Dugardin); M. Schapelhouman, ‘Tekeningen van Guilliam dú Gardijn’, Vouwblad Stedelijk Museum Alkmaar, 1995, pp. 4-7; P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, pp. 74-76; M. Gruijs, De tekeningen van Karel Dujardin (1626-1678), Utrecht 2003 (unpublished MA thesis), pp. 123-28; E.J. Sluijter, Rembrandt’s Rivals: History Painting in Amsterdam, 1630-1650, Amsterdam 2015, pp. 259-62


Entry

It is only on closer examination that the cavernous space depicted on the recto is seen to be a vault of masonry, possibly a view inside the Colosseum, Rome. Van Regteren Altena believed this to be the same ruin as one in a large drawing by Cornelis van Poelenburch (1594-1667) in the museum’s collection (inv. no. RP-T-1884-A-293).6P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, no. 266.

Running across the middle of the sheet is a sharp crease that divides the two scenes on the verso. This would appear to be a page from a sketchbook, were it not for the fact that the drawings on both the recto and verso extend right up to the fold. If Du Gardijn had made them when the sheet were still in the sketchbook, one would expect to see a blank strip, however narrow, on either side of the fold. The more likely explanation is that Du Gardijn removed the page from the book before he set to work.

Many of Du Gardijn’s drawings bear price notations. Initially one is tempted to regard them as the prices for which the sheets were sold, but that theory is soon demolished, by this one in particular. There are no fewer than three prices: on the recto 30.st.; on the verso is the same sum included below the drawing of the unidentified ruins; and then 1. gl: beneath the View in a Cave. Three prices cannot possibly apply to one and the same sheet. There are two other possibilities: that they refer either to something that was finished and had left the studio, or to something that still had to be made. In the first case, the drawings would have been part of a sort of liber veritatis, a collection of autograph copies of works that had been sold, with the prices being the sums paid for the originals. The large size of many of the drawings argues against this theory, for a liber veritatis would probably have been on a more modest scale, like the famous one by Claude Lorrain (1604/05-1682) in the British Museum, London (inv. no. 1957,1214.6-206a-b), containing 195 drawings that the artist made as a record of his paintings from circa 1635 onwards. The second alternative is that the drawings served as a kind of catalogue for prospective buyers, who could pick out the scene they wanted to have in a finished version costing thirty stuivers or one guilder. This seems the more likely explanation, although it does not provide all the answers by any means.7On these price notations, see S. de Vries (ed.), Twee olieverfschetsen van Guilliam de Gardijn. Een toeschrijving met verrassende gevolgen, Alkmaar 1995, unpaginated (p. 7).

Marijn Schapelhouman, 1998


Literature

I.Q. van Regteren Altena, Vereeuwigde Stad. Rome door Nederlanders getekend, 1500-1900, Amsterdam 1964, pp. 107-08, under no. 54 (as Karel Dujardin); H. Robels, Niederländische Zeichnungen vom 15. bis 19. Jahrhundert im Wallraf-Richartz-Museum Köln, coll. cat. Cologne 1983 (Kataloge des Wallraf-Richartz-Museums Graphische Sammlung, vol. 1), pp. 98-99, under no. 142 (as attributed to Karel Dujardin); G. Jansen and G. Luijten, Italanisanten en bambocianten. Het italianiserend landschap en genre door Nederlandse kunstenaars uit de zeventiende eeuw, exh. cat. Rotterdam (Museum Boymans-van Beuningen), 1988, pp. 92-93, under no. 53 (n. 4; as attributed to Karel Dujardin); M. Schapelhouman and P. Schatborn, Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam: Artists Born between 1580 and 1600, 2 vols., coll. cat. Amsterdam 1998, no. 112; P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, pp. 75-76, figs. C-D


Citation

M. Schapelhouman, 1998, 'Guilliam du Gardijn, View in the Vaults of a Classical Ruin / verso: View in a Cave and View of a Classical Ruin, Rome, c. 1620 - c. 1625', in J. Turner (ed.), Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200146118

(accessed 21 December 2025 07:28:48).

Footnotes

  • 1A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aantekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten (II)’, Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 143.
  • 2H. Jedding, ‘Roos Family’ (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T073818; accessed 2 June 2020.
  • 3P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, p. 74.
  • 4Ibid.
  • 5Ibid.
  • 6P. Schatborn, with J. Verberne, Drawn to Warmth: 17th-century Dutch Artists in Italy, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2001, no. 266.
  • 7On these price notations, see S. de Vries (ed.), Twee olieverfschetsen van Guilliam de Gardijn. Een toeschrijving met verrassende gevolgen, Alkmaar 1995, unpaginated (p. 7).