Getting started with the collection:
Study of a Standing Boar, Facing Right
attributed to Paulus Potter, c. 1645 - c. 1650
- Artwork typedrawing
- Object numberRP-T-1884-A-371
- Dimensionsheight 60 mm x width 71 mm
- Physical characteristicsblack chalk; outlines indented for transfer; traces of framing line in black ink
Discover more
Identification
Title(s)
Study of a Standing Boar, Facing Right
Object type
Object number
RP-T-1884-A-371
Part of catalogue
Creation
Creation
- draftsman (artist): attributed to Paulus Potter
- Karel du Jardin (possibly) [rejected attribution]
Dating
c. 1645 - c. 1650
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
black chalk; outlines indented for transfer; traces of framing line in black ink
Dimensions
height 60 mm x width 71 mm
This work is about
Subject
Acquisition and rights
Credit line
Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt
Acquisition
purchase 1884
Copyright
Provenance
…; collection Jacob de Vos Jbzn (1803-78), Amsterdam (L. 1450); his widow, Abrahamina Henrietta de Vos-Wurfbain (1808-83), Amsterdam; sale, Jacob de Vos Jbzn, Amsterdam (C.F. Roos et al.), 22 May 1883 _sqq_., no. 260, with 7 other drawings, fl. 171 for all, to the dealer G.C.V. Schöffer for the Vereniging Rembrandt;{Copy RKD; note RMA.} from whom acquired by the museum (L. 2227), 1884
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!
Paulus Potter (attributed to)
Study of a Standing Boar, Facing Right
c. 1645 - c. 1650
Inscriptions
Technical notes
watermark: foolscap (fragment)
Provenance
…; collection Jacob de Vos Jbzn (1803-78), Amsterdam (L. 1450); his widow, Abrahamina Henrietta de Vos-Wurfbain (1808-83), Amsterdam; sale, Jacob de Vos Jbzn, Amsterdam (C.F. Roos et al.), 22 May 1883 sqq., no. 260, with 7 other drawings, fl. 171 for all, to the dealer G.C.V. Schöffer for the Vereniging Rembrandt;1Copy RKD; note RMA. from whom acquired by the museum (L. 2227), 1884
Object number: RP-T-1884-A-371
Credit line: Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt
The artist
Biography
Paulus Potter (Enkhuizen 1625 – 1654 Amsterdam)
He was baptized on 20 November 1625 in the Reformed Church in Enkhuizen as the son of Pieter Symonsz Potter (1597/1601-1652) and Aechtie Pouwels (?-?).2Hoorn, Westfries Archief, DTB Enkhuizen 5, fol. 98v. Through his mother’s side, Paulus was a descendant of the Counts of Egmond and the influential Semeyns family from Enkhuizen. In 1628, the family moved to Leiden and, three years later in 1631, to Amsterdam, where Potter must have spent most of his youth. His father, who was a glass painter and a painter of landscapes, still-lives, history and genre scenes, became a member of the Guild of St Luke shortly thereafter. In the second half of the 1630s, the Potter family was living in the Sint-Anthoniebreestraat, with the art dealer Hendrick Uylenburgh (c. 1587-1661) and Rembrandt (1606-1669) residing nearby.
Potter’s earliest known works can be dated to the beginning of the 1640s. It is likely that he was trained by his father, but soon surpassed him in artistic skill. Although his parents had at least eleven children, none of Paulus’s siblings is known today as an artist. That Potter was aware of his talent and ambition is clear from an inscription on a drawing dated 1641 of a Boar Hunt in the Städel Museum, Frankfurt-am-Main (inv. no. 893 Z),3A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, no. 32. in which he states that he was fourteen years old (‘Paulus Potter f. out. 14, Jaer. a. 1641’).4Since Potter turned sixteen in November 1641, it is more likely that he was fifteen years old. He may have made the mistake on purpose to stress his young age, or added the inscription at a later date; cf. B. Broos in ibid. The drawing was part of the famous collection of Sybrand Feitama II (1694-1758), who also recorded this inscription in his notes: ‘Paulus Potter 1 Zwynejagt, geteekend a° 1641, toen (volgens zyn eigen handschrift) oud 14 jaren: gehandeld a° 1739’; B.P.J. Broos, ‘“Notitie der Teekeningen van Sybrand Feitama”, II. “Verkocht, verhandeld, verëerd, geruild en overgedaan”’, Oud Holland 99 (1985), no. 2, p. 147. It is assumed that Potter studied the works of history painters active in Amsterdam at the time, such as Claes Moeyaert (1591-1669), who may have been his teacher.5First suggested by C. Hofstede de Groot (ed.), Beschreibendes und kritisches Verzeichnis der Werke der hervorragenden holländischen Maler des XVII. Jahrhunderts, 10 vols., Esslingen 1907-28, IV (1911), p. 611. Like many other artists, Potter focused on biblical and mythological scenes early in his career. Only later on did he dedicated himself to the prominent, realistic and detailed rendering of rural life and animals situated in Dutch landscapes. Potter’s only documented apprenticeship is his training under the Haarlem artist Jacob de Wet (c. 1610-1677/91), who recorded in his administrative notes that Potter paid him 8 pounds for a year of painting lessons in 1642.6Haarlem, Noord-Hollands Archief, Kennemer Atlas te Haarlem, inv. no. 53-999002K: ‘jaer 1642 / den 12 may is P potter bij mijn te schilderen gecoomen voor de soma van acht pont int jaer’ (‘year 1642 / P. Potter came to me on 12 May to paint for the sum of 8 pounds per year.’). Since the influence of Haarlem artists, such as Pieter van Laer (1599-1642), Pieter de Molijn (1595-1661) and Gerrit Claesz Bleker (1592/93-1656), can be recognized in his works from 1643 onwards, Potter may have moved to this city.
On 6 August 1646, Potter is documented in Delft, where he paid the sum of 12 guilders to the Guild of St Luke – the standard fee paid by artists from outside the town.7T. van Westrheene, Paulus Potter: Sa vie et ses oeuvres, The Hague 1867, p. 50 (n. 1). There is no archival evidence that Potter was living there as well, but some topographical details in his paintings point to the area of Delft and The Hague. His life-size masterpiece, The Bull of 1647 in the Mauritshuis, The Hague (inv. no. 136),8E. Buijsen in A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, no. 8. for example, shows the church of Rijswijk in the background. In 1649, Potter applied for membership in the Guild of St Luke in The Hague,9The Hague, Haags Gemeentearchief, 0376-01 Ambachtsgilden en bussen, inv. no. 113, fol. 37v. where his father and family had already moved in 1647. Together with his relatives, Potter lived at Dunne Bierkade 17, in a house owned by the painter and draughtsman Jan van Goyen (1596-1656), who lived next door. The neighbor on the other side was Claes Dircksz van Balckeneynde (1599/1600-1656), who was a contractor and responsible for the building and renovation of several estates and royal residences, such as Hofwijck, Huis Honselaarsdijk and Sorghvliet. According to Houbraken, he introduced Potter to important patrons, such as Johan Maurits, Count and later Prince of Nassau-Siegen (1604-1679), who frequented his studio.10A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 127: ‘Zyn Hoogheid Prins Maurits en meer andere grooten kwamen onzen Paulus Potter dikwerf op zyn schildervertrek bezoeken’. Houbraken also recorded a somewhat dubious anecdote that for Amalia van Solms (1602-1675) Potter painted a large chimney piece for Noordeinde Palace, now believed to be The Farm in the State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg (inv. no. 820), which she rejected, because the detail of a pissing cow was not considered a suitable subject.11Ibid., p. 127: ‘een redelyk groot stuk, (…), voor de oude Princes Emilia van Solms, ’t geen geplaatst zoude worden voor een schoorsteen, op ’t oude Hof: maar (...) “Dat het een al te vuil voorwerp was voor hare Hoogheid, om dagelyks te bespiegelen”. Dit zeggen doelde op de pissende Koe, die daar in verbeeld staat, waar by ’t stuk bekent is.’; cf. E. Buijsen in A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, no. 15. Although Potter created several large hunting scenes and monumental paintings, he also continued his production of cabinet paintings on a much smaller scale.
On 3 July 1650, Potter married Balckeneynde’s daughter Adriana (1626-1690).12The Hague, Haags Gemeentearchief, DTB 745, fol. 40v. Their first son, Pieter, died shortly after his birth in 1651. According to Houbraken, Potter’s wife recalled that he always carried a sketchbook in his pocket, even when he had an hour to spare to walk outside with her, so that he could make a sketch, whenever he saw something witty.13A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 129: ‘dat hy zelf wanneer hy een uur voor haar over had om een wandeling te doen na buiten, altyd een tafelboekje in zyn zak by zig droeg; om als hy iets zag dat geestig was, en in zyn kraam konde dienen, straks dat voorwerp af te schetsen’. Several sheets in black chalk, measuring approximately 100 x 150 mm, have been preserved that could well have been part of such a sketchbook (e.g. inv. no. RP-T-1901-A-4539). Potter also gained popularity as a printmaker, mainly through his series of eight etchings of oxen and cows, called the ‘Bullenboekje’, of 1650,14F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, XVII (1976), pp. 212-16, nos. 1-8. followed by a series of five etchings of horses a year later.15Ibid., nos. 9-13.
In 1652, Potter was again living in Amsterdam. Houbraken reported that the surgeon and burgomaster Nicolaes Tulp (1593-1674) persuaded him to return, promising that his works would be appreciated there more than in The Hague, and that better commissions would come his way.16A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 129. In 1653, Potter painted the monumental and life-size equestrian portrait of Tulp’s son, Dirk Tulp (1624-1682), now in the Six Collection in Amsterdam. A year after the birth of his daughter Dingenom, Potter died at the young age of twenty-eight, probably of tuberculosis, and was buried in the Nieuwezijds Kapel in Amsterdam on 23 January 1654.17T. van Westrheene, Paulus Potter: Sa Vie et ses oeuvres, The Hague 1867, p. 72. In memory of her husband, Adriana commissioned Bartholomeus van der Helst (1613-1670) to paint Potter’s posthumous portrait (The Hague, Mauritshuis, inv. no. 54).18B. Broos and A. van Suchtelen et al., Portraits in the Mauritshuis, coll. cat. The Hague 2004, no. 27. Adriana and Dingenom returned to The Hague, where the four-year-old girl died in 1657. The artist Marcus de Bye (1639-c. 1690) produced some sixty etchings after Potter’s death and based himself on a small number of designs by the deceased artist, possibly turned over to him by Potter’s widow in order to increase her husband’s posthumous reputation. In 1661 Adriana married Dirck Jansz van Reenen (1628-1705), and their son, Nicolaes van Reenen (1662-1728), was an important source for Houbraken’s account of the painter’s life.19Cf. Q. Buvelot, ‘A Newly Discovered Letter to Arnold Houbraken on the Life of Paulus Potter’, Burlington Magazine 147 (2015), no. 2, pp. 92-96.
Milou Goverde, 2020
References
A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), pp. 125-30; T. van Westrheene, Paulus Potter: Sa Vie et ses oeuvres, The Hague 1867; F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, II (1880), pp. 139-40; III (1881), p. 263; A. Bredius, ‘Pieter Symonsz. Potter. Glaseschrijver, ooc schilder’, Oud Holland 11 (1893), no. 1, pp. 34-46; C. Hofstede de Groot (ed.), Beschreibendes und kritisches Verzeichnis der Werke der hervorragenden holländischen Maler des XVII. Jahrhunderts, 10 vols., Esslingen 1907-28, IV (1911), pp. 609-98; R. von Arps-Aubert, Die Entwicklung des reinen Tierbildes in der Kunst des Paulus Potters, Halle 1932 (PhD diss., Halle-Wittenberg University 1931); U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XXVII (1933), pp. 306-7 (entry by R. von Arps-Aubert); E.L. Allhusen, ‘The Etchings of Paul Potter’, The Print Collector’s Quarterly 26 (1939), pp. 209-23; E.L. Allhusen, ‘Catalogue of the Etchings of Paul Potter: Compiled from the Catalogues of Bartsch, Duplessis and Dutuit’, The Print Collector’s Quarterly 26 (1939), pp. 335-47; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, XVII (1976), pp. 211-24; A. Walsh, Paulus Potter: His Works and their Meaning, 2 vols., Ann Arbor 1991 (PhD diss., Columbia University, 1985), pp. 17-50; A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95; E. Buijsen (ed.), Haagse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw. Het Hoogsteder Lexicon van alle schilders werkzaam in Den Haag, 1600-1700, Zwolle 1998, pp. 224-29, 338; Q. Buvelot, ‘A Newly Discovered Letter to Arnold Houbraken on the Life of Paulus Potter’, Burlington Magazine 147 (2015), no. 2, pp. 92-96
Entry
When Hofstede de Groot discussed Potter’s drawings in 1929, he accepted only a handful as autograph, including ‘zwei Blättchen mit Schweineköpfen’ (‘two little sheets of swine’s heads’), one of which is assumed to be the Head of a Female Wild Boar (inv. no. RP-T-1901-A-4539), that arrived in the Rijksmuseum with the Study of a Young Pig (inv. RP-T-1901-A-4540.20C. Hofstede de Groot, ‘Einige Betrachtungen über die Ausstellung holländischer Kunst in London’, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 50 (1929), p. 146. With their spiky, staccato strokes of black chalk, the handling of this pair closely resembles that of another pair of drawings of swine in the Rijksmuseum – the present sheet and the Study of Three Boars (inv. no. [RP-T-1884-A-370](/en/collection/ RP-T-1884-A-370/catalogue-entry)). These two sheets, however, belong to a group of eight drawings that were catalogued as by Karel Dujardin (1626-1678) when they appeared together as a lot in the Jacob de Vos Jbzn sale of 1883.21Six of those sheets, inv. nos. RP-T-1884-A-368, RP-T-1884-A-369, RP-T-1884-A-372, RP-T-1884-A-374, RP-T-A-375 and RP-T-1884-A-376, are evidently by different hands, now assigned to the circle of Dujardin or that of Cornelis Saftleven (1607-1681). Clearly belonging to this same group of swine studies is the Study of Two Standing Boars in the Louvre, Paris (inv. no. 22826).22A. Stefes, ‘Traces Traced: Methods for Transfer Found in Drawings by Karel Dujardin, Willem Romeyn and Jan de Bray’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 45 (2019), fig. 4.
Today, we are better able to judge the attribution to Potter of such individual animal studies thanks to rough, but securely documented compositional sketches of pigs that have come to light since Hofstede de Groot’s 1929 article. This includes Potter’s monogrammed Standing and Recumbent Pigs in the Frits Lugt Collection, Fondation Custodia, Paris (inv. no. 5100),23A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, p. 46, fig. 11. and A Sow and her Farrow in the Maida and George Abrams Collection), Boston,24Ibid., no. 44. which was used by the artist for his painting of 1652, Cattle in a Meadow, in the Maurithuis, The Hague (inv. no. 138).25Ibid., no. 25.
The present sheet’s traditional attribution to Paulus Potter has never been challenged in print. In recent decades, however, doubts concerning its status and that of the three stylistically related studies of swine in the Rijksmuseum have emerged. The name of Dujardin has been mooted for some, if not all of them.26Draft catalogue entries by Ingrid Oud, 2000 (all four as ‘Karel Dujardin (?)/Annemaries Stefes, 2018 (inv. no. RP-T-1884-A-371 as Dujardin).
There is no doubt whatsoever that Dujardin had access to some of Potter’s original drawings of swine.27It is well known that following the premature death of her young husband, Potter’s widow granted access to his drawings to the reproductive printmaker Marcus de Bye (1638/39-1688), presumably in an effort to perpetuate his posthumous reputation, and the same could have been true for Dujardin. Dujardin incorporated motifs from Potter in both his etchings and his paintings. The animal on the right of the Louvre drawing, for instance, appears, in reverse, in Dujardin’s signed and dated etching Two Pigs of 1656 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-12.486),28F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols, Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, VI (1952), p. 33, no. 15. and the Rijksmuseum’s Study of a Standing Boar, Facing Right features, in reverse, in the etching Three Swine near a Hedge of circa 1656 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-12.487),29Ibid., no. 16. Similarly, the present Study of a Young Pig was copied by Dujardin for a detail of his painting Swineherd and Pigs in a Wooded Landscape of circa 1655 in the Kunsthalle, Bremen (inv. no. 1194-1977/3),30J.M. Kilian, The Paintings of Karel Du Jardin (1626-1678): Catalogue raisonné, Amsterdam 2005, no. 29. Nearly the same creature appears, in reverse, at the left of Dujardin’s painting Farmyard with Animals in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford (inv. no. WA1940.20), 31Ibid., no. 37. which also incorporates the recumbent swine from the left of the Lugt drawing by Potter. Moreover, the young pig looking straight out at the viewer in that drawing is represented in one of the Rijksmuseum’s own paintings by Dujardin, Landscape with Two Donkeys, Goats and Swine (inv. no. SK-A-195).32Ibid., no. 27.
This is the only one of the four Rijksmuseum sheets of swine that is indented, which led Stefes to conclude that it – unlike the other three studies – is not an autograph drawing by Potter but rather Dujardin’s copy of a lost original sketch.33A. Stefes, ‘Traces Traced: Methods for Transfer Found in Drawings by Karel Dujardin, Willem Romeyn and Jan de Bray’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 45 (2019), p. 11. According to this hypothesis, this he would have felt free to trace with a stylus for his etching (where the motif is the same size). In her opinion, compared to the other three drawings, the standing boar manifests ‘softer contours, best shown in the slightly billowing line indicating the snout’ and the chalk is a lighter grey. However, during a Connoisseurship Master Class on Dutch drawings held at the Rijksmuseum on 9-10 September 2019, participants deemed such differences – if present at all (and not the result of condition) – to be too minor to support such an alternative conclusion about the drawing’s authorship. All four drawings seem to be characterized by the same crisp contours, with decisive, short strokes accentuating the bristly fur and the animals’ hooves. Until more compelling evidence is offered, it is best to retain all four studies under the name of Paulus Potter.
A copy after the present drawing in the Städel Museum, Frankfurt-am-Main, catalogued as by Potter (inv. no. 1341 Z), is possibly the work of a pupil. Although it closely follows the Rijksprentenkabinet’s sheet, the copyist’s hand is revealed in the somewhat decoratively arranged tufts of fur along nape and shoulder.34Confirmed by Martin Sonnabend, e-mail to Stefes, 9 June 2016. The same collection owns a – considerably weaker – copy after the etched version, likewise ascribed to Paulus Potter: Standing Boar, Facing the Left (inv. no. 3111 Z).
Annemarie Stefes, 2018/Jane Shoaf Turner, 2020
Literature
M. Gruijs, De tekeningen van Karel Dujardin (1626-1678), Utrecht 2003 (M.A. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht), p. 22 and no. III-2 (as Karel Dujardin); A. Stefes, ‘Traces Traced: Methods for Transfer Found in Drawings by Karel Dujardin, Willem Romeyn and Jan de Bray’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 45 (2019), pp. 11, 12, fig. 1 (as Karel Dujardin)
Citation
A. Stefes, 2018/J. Shoaf Turner, 2020, 'attributed to Paulus Potter, _, c. 1645 - c. 1650', in J. Turner (ed.), _Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200125757
(accessed 26 juli 2026 01:24:51 UTC+0).Footnotes
- 1Copy RKD; note RMA.
- 2Hoorn, Westfries Archief, DTB Enkhuizen 5, fol. 98v.
- 3A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, no. 32.
- 4Since Potter turned sixteen in November 1641, it is more likely that he was fifteen years old. He may have made the mistake on purpose to stress his young age, or added the inscription at a later date; cf. B. Broos in ibid. The drawing was part of the famous collection of Sybrand Feitama II (1694-1758), who also recorded this inscription in his notes: ‘Paulus Potter 1 Zwynejagt, geteekend a° 1641, toen (volgens zyn eigen handschrift) oud 14 jaren: gehandeld a° 1739’; B.P.J. Broos, ‘“Notitie der Teekeningen van Sybrand Feitama”, II. “Verkocht, verhandeld, verëerd, geruild en overgedaan”’, Oud Holland 99 (1985), no. 2, p. 147.
- 5First suggested by C. Hofstede de Groot (ed.), Beschreibendes und kritisches Verzeichnis der Werke der hervorragenden holländischen Maler des XVII. Jahrhunderts, 10 vols., Esslingen 1907-28, IV (1911), p. 611.
- 6Haarlem, Noord-Hollands Archief, Kennemer Atlas te Haarlem, inv. no. 53-999002K: ‘jaer 1642 / den 12 may is P potter bij mijn te schilderen gecoomen voor de soma van acht pont int jaer’ (‘year 1642 / P. Potter came to me on 12 May to paint for the sum of 8 pounds per year.’).
- 7T. van Westrheene, Paulus Potter: Sa vie et ses oeuvres, The Hague 1867, p. 50 (n. 1).
- 8E. Buijsen in A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, no. 8.
- 9The Hague, Haags Gemeentearchief, 0376-01 Ambachtsgilden en bussen, inv. no. 113, fol. 37v.
- 10A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 127: ‘Zyn Hoogheid Prins Maurits en meer andere grooten kwamen onzen Paulus Potter dikwerf op zyn schildervertrek bezoeken’.
- 11Ibid., p. 127: ‘een redelyk groot stuk, (…), voor de oude Princes Emilia van Solms, ’t geen geplaatst zoude worden voor een schoorsteen, op ’t oude Hof: maar (...) “Dat het een al te vuil voorwerp was voor hare Hoogheid, om dagelyks te bespiegelen”. Dit zeggen doelde op de pissende Koe, die daar in verbeeld staat, waar by ’t stuk bekent is.’; cf. E. Buijsen in A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, no. 15.
- 12The Hague, Haags Gemeentearchief, DTB 745, fol. 40v.
- 13A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 129: ‘dat hy zelf wanneer hy een uur voor haar over had om een wandeling te doen na buiten, altyd een tafelboekje in zyn zak by zig droeg; om als hy iets zag dat geestig was, en in zyn kraam konde dienen, straks dat voorwerp af te schetsen’.
- 14F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, XVII (1976), pp. 212-16, nos. 1-8.
- 15Ibid., nos. 9-13.
- 16A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), p. 129.
- 17T. van Westrheene, Paulus Potter: Sa Vie et ses oeuvres, The Hague 1867, p. 72.
- 18B. Broos and A. van Suchtelen et al., Portraits in the Mauritshuis, coll. cat. The Hague 2004, no. 27.
- 19Cf. Q. Buvelot, ‘A Newly Discovered Letter to Arnold Houbraken on the Life of Paulus Potter’, Burlington Magazine 147 (2015), no. 2, pp. 92-96.
- 20C. Hofstede de Groot, ‘Einige Betrachtungen über die Ausstellung holländischer Kunst in London’, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 50 (1929), p. 146.
- 21Six of those sheets, inv. nos. RP-T-1884-A-368, RP-T-1884-A-369, RP-T-1884-A-372, RP-T-1884-A-374, RP-T-A-375 and RP-T-1884-A-376, are evidently by different hands, now assigned to the circle of Dujardin or that of Cornelis Saftleven (1607-1681).
- 22A. Stefes, ‘Traces Traced: Methods for Transfer Found in Drawings by Karel Dujardin, Willem Romeyn and Jan de Bray’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 45 (2019), fig. 4.
- 23A. Walsh et al., Paulus Potter. Schilderijen, tekeningen en etsen, exh. cat. The Hague (Mauritshuis) 1994-95, p. 46, fig. 11.
- 24Ibid., no. 44.
- 25Ibid., no. 25.
- 26Draft catalogue entries by Ingrid Oud, 2000 (all four as ‘Karel Dujardin (?)/Annemaries Stefes, 2018 (inv. no. RP-T-1884-A-371 as Dujardin).
- 27It is well known that following the premature death of her young husband, Potter’s widow granted access to his drawings to the reproductive printmaker Marcus de Bye (1638/39-1688), presumably in an effort to perpetuate his posthumous reputation, and the same could have been true for Dujardin.
- 28F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols, Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, VI (1952), p. 33, no. 15.
- 29Ibid., no. 16.
- 30J.M. Kilian, The Paintings of Karel Du Jardin (1626-1678): Catalogue raisonné, Amsterdam 2005, no. 29.
- 31Ibid., no. 37.
- 32Ibid., no. 27.
- 33A. Stefes, ‘Traces Traced: Methods for Transfer Found in Drawings by Karel Dujardin, Willem Romeyn and Jan de Bray’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 45 (2019), p. 11.
- 34Confirmed by Martin Sonnabend, e-mail to Stefes, 9 June 2016.

















