Getting started with the collection:
anonymous
St Sebastian
Mechelen, c. 1525
Inscriptions
- mark, on the reverse of the console, branded: three vertical pales (the Mechelen wood quality mark)
- coat of arms, hanging on the tree: blank (heraldic crest overpainted?)
- coat of arms, on the console, painted: an abraded (and therefore illegible) heraldic crest
Technical notes
The sculpture consists of two separately carved elements, Sebastian and the console, both subsequently polychromed and partly gilded; the reverse of Sebastian’s body has been left rough-finished and unpainted in areas. The seven arrows were also carved separately and subsequently inserted into the body.
Scientific examination and reports
- conservation report: A. Lorne (The Hague), 1995
Literature scientific examination and reports
Jaarverslag Nederlandse Rijksmusea 1983, p. 19
Condition
Woodworm damage can be discerned in areas, primarily on the pedestal and the ends of the tree branches. Missing are a section of the loincloth’s hem, a segment of the cord near the wrist of Sebastian’s right hand, several branches on the tree, and segments of the band from which the escutcheon hangs on the tree and the band of the escutcheon held by the angel on the console. The polychromy is original, perhaps excepting the escutcheon on the original, accompanying console.
Conservation
- A. van Grevenstein, 1983: four fingers of Sebastian’s left hand, and two arrows renewed. Removal of later oil paint layers covering the original polychromy.
Provenance
…; ? the former Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe-Gasthuis, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwestraat, Mechelen, c. 1525 or later;1T. de Haseth Möller, ‘Anonymous, St Sebastian, Mechelen, c. 1525’, in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam 2020. transferred to an unknown location, 1858 or earlier;2Contrary to at least three of the other sculptures from the same ensemble, the St Sebastian does not appear to have been moved to the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe-Gasthuis’ new complex on the Keizerstraat in Mechelen in 1857-58, see T. de Haseth Möller, ‘Anonymous, St Sebastian, Mechelen, c. 1525’, in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam 2020.…; from the dealer Van Gerwen-Lemmens, Valkenswaard, fl. 65,000, to the museum as a gift from the Fotocommissie, 1971; on loan to the Museum voor Religieuze Kunst, Uden, 2005-12
ObjectNumber: BK-1971-50
Credit line: Purchased with the support of the Stichting tot Bevordering van de Belangen van het Rijksmuseum
Entry
According to traditional belief, St Sebastian was a Roman officer of the Praetorian Guard under Emperor Diocletian in the third century AD who fell into disgrace upon the discovery of his Christian faith. Sebastian was said to have been tied naked to a tree trunk on the emperor’s orders, with his body subsequently riddled with the arrows of the Roman soldiers. Miraculously, he survived this first sentencing, only to be arrested once again and clubbed to death.
In the Middle Ages, Sebastian was venerated as a plague saint across all of Europe, with the arrows seen as a symbol of the disease sent down by God. For the period in which the present work was carved, however, virtually no sculptures of the saint are known to have originated from Mechelen.3Halsema-Kubes described the Amsterdam Sebastian as the sole example (W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88, esp. p. 183). Wyss additionally cited a small Sebastian in Bern, in the tradition of the poupeés de Malines (R.L. Wyss, ‘Der heilige Sebastian’, Bericht über die Tätigkeit der Eidgenössischen Kommission der Gottfried-Keller-Stiftung 1969/72, pp. 67-77). A third, likewise early statuette was formerly held in the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe Gasthuis in Mechelen (A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96). The Sebastian from the series of plague saints in the old Sint-Pieterskerk in Mechelen dates from the third quarter of the 16th century (C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, p. 143, no. 24). Dating from the same period is a Mechelen alabaster relief of Sebastian’s martyrdom, preserved in Antwerp, Museum Mayer van den Bergh (J. De Coo (ed.), Catalogus 2: Beeldhouwkunst, plaketten, antiek, coll. cat. Antwerp (Museum Mayer van den Bergh) 1969, no. 2300). In style and height, the Amsterdam Sebastian is exceptional as well. Sculptural production in the city of Mechelen circa 1500 consisted mainly of the so-called poupées de Malines (Mechelen dolls): polychromed wooden depictions of saints with doll-like faces, generally measuring no more than about 40 cm in height. Larger-scale variants like the present Sebastian only became more common in the second quarter of the sixteenth century.4J. Jansen, ‘Mechelse rondsculptuur in hout tijdens de Renaissance: De studie van twee modellen’, in C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, p. 19.
Margaret of Austria died in 1530, after having served as governess of the Burgundian Netherlands for twenty-three years. She was a great lover of music, literature and art, and the city from which she ruled, Mechelen, became a major centre of humanism and artistic innovation during this period. With the presence of the modern-thinking artists attending her court from abroad, the city also became one of the first artistic centres in northern Europe where the influence of the Italian Renaissance was perceptible. Stylistically, the Amsterdam Sebastian is a work exemplifying Mechelen sculpture in its transition from gothic to renaissance. Sebastian is one of the few saints traditionally depicted naked, providing a means for renaissance artists to demonstrate their knowledge of the male nude according to the new, classical ideal. The forceful corporeality and realistically rendered muscles of the Amsterdam Sebastian reveal the artist’s familiarity with such examples. The notably small waistline and full hips nevertheless recall a far less robust type of the male nude commonly encountered in the Middle Ages, which likewise entails a pronounced waistline and hips but then combined with narrow shoulders, a lean rib cage, bony arms and legs, and a poignant facial expression.5Compare for example to the late fifteenth-century Sebastian in Paris, Musée du Louvre, inv. no. RF 2320, and Dismas, the Penitent Thief of c. 1530 in Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, inv. no. BK-16547-A. The sweet, serene face of the Amsterdam Sebastian, however, displays not the slightest trace of suffering, as if invulnerable to fear and pain. He submits to his terrible fate, as to be expected of a Christian saint. The small, heart-shaped mouth, the half-closed and heavy-lidded eyes and the refined arching of the eyebrows are indeed as yet reminiscent of the ‘Mechelen doll’. The overall figure, however, has obtained a far more dynamic character all its own, achieved through the elegant ‘S’-curve of the body, the fluttering loincloth, lively limbs and muscled nudity. In comparison, the console with its gothic moulding appears outdated.
All indications are that the Amsterdam Sebastian belonged to a series of five plague saints, four of which are today preserved at the Museum Hof van Busleyden in Mechelen: the Sts Anthony Abbot, Christopher, Adrian, and Roch of Montpellier.6Mechelen, Museum Hof van Busleyden, on loan from the OCMW (Public Centre for Social Welfare), inv. nos. B2 to B5, see KIK-IRPA, object nos. 99150 (Anthony Abbot), 115664 (Christopher), 115666 (Adrian) and 115667 (Roch). See also, for example A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96; J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. 67-71; W. Godenne, ‘Préliminaires à l’inventaire général des statuettes d’origine malinoise, présumées des XVe et XVIe siècles’, Bulletin du Cercle Archéologique, Littéraire et Artistique de Malines 64 (1960), pp. 108-29, esp. pp. 108-12, figs. 64-66, 69; W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88, esp. figs. 5-8; C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, nos. 10-13. All are approximately the same height as the Sebastian and mounted on gothic-profiled consoles borne by angels holding escutcheons, just as the present work. By his nakedness alone, the Sebastian initially appears markedly different from the others. Upon closer inspection, however, a marked stylistic agreement emerges in details such as the jutting cheekbones and the form of eyes, nose, mouth and a number of the limbs. The right hands on both Sebastian and Anthony (fig. a) – specifically, the broad back of the hand and the noticeably lively fingers – are very similar.7Cf. W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88. The fingers on Sebastian’s left hand are non-original and cannot be compared to those of Anthony. The close resemblance between Sebastian and Anthony is also apparent in other respects. In corporeal terms, these two figures are rendered with greater suppleness than the others. Where Sebastian’s loincloth and Anthony’s robe display a perceivable Schwung, the drapery folds of the other three are heavy. The hands, legs and feet (inasmuch as they can be discerned) on both the Roch and Christopher are ostensibly finished with less precision. Furthermore, Anthony and Sebastian possess the same rich, glowing flesh tones, while those of the other three appear rather dull.8Findings based on a comparison between the Amsterdam Sebastian and images of the other four sculptures in the database of KIK-IRPA, object nos. 99150 (Anthony Abbot), 115664 (Christopher), 115666 (Adrian) and 115667 (Roch).
Nothing is known about the series’ background, other than the fact that four of the figures – the Adrian, Anthony Abbot, Roch and in all probability the Christopher – originally stood in the chapel of the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe-Gasthuis in Mechelen, founded at the end of the twelfth century on the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwestraat. In the years 1857-58, the hospital and its contents were moved to a new complex on the Keiserstraat. At this time, the four above-cited plague saints were transferred to the new chapel, where they were mounted high up on columns standing near the altar where they could be seen by bed-ridden patients in the adjoining men’s and women’s sick wards.9W. Godenne, ‘Préliminaires à l’inventaire général des statuettes d’origine malinoise, présumées des XVe et XVIe siècles’, Bulletin du Cercle Archéologique, Littéraire et Artistique de Malines 64 (1960), pp. 108-29, esp. p. 109. What year the sculptures came into the possession of the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe-Gasthuis in Mechelen is not known. They do not appear in Jean-Baptiste de Noter’s watercolour showing the baroque interior of the old hospital chapel in the year 1830,10Mechelen, OCMW (Public Centre for Social Welfare), inv. no. G 17, see KIK-IRPA, object no. 99029. though this does not exclude a location elsewhere in the church. In Willocx’s 1895 history of the hospital, only the Anthony, Adrian and the Roch are noted standing in the new chapel. Describing them as statues from the ‘Brabantine school of around 1500’, he makes no mention of the Christopher or Sebastian.11A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96. Describing another area of the chapel, however, Willocx does note, standing left of an altar: ‘on a block with escutcheon, a small wooden statue of the St Sebastian… of the gothic era…’.12op een blok met wapenschild een klein houten beeld van den H. Sebastiaan…van het gotiek tijdstip…; A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96. The emphasis on the figure’s small size and the distinction between the ‘Brabantine school’ and ‘gothic era’ and make it improbable that he was referring to the Sebastian in the Rijksmuseum.13A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96. In the case of the Christopher, however, Willocx is likely to have been mistaken. In 1960, Godenne described all four works today preserved at the Hof van Busleyden as standing in the chapel: …placées très haut et mal éclairées…. Borchgrave d’Altena also discusses the Christopher in the same context, together with the Anthony, Adrian and Roch.14W. Godenne, ‘Préliminaires à l’inventaire général des statuettes d’origine malinoise, présumées des XVe et XVIe siècles’, Bulletin du Cercle Archéologique, Littéraire et Artistique de Malines 64 (1960), pp. 108-29, esp. p. 108; J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. p. 69. Evident is that both men were unaware of the Amsterdam Sebastian, suggesting its possible separation from the group even prior to being moved to the new hospital.
The painted coat of arms on the console of St Sebastian cannot be determined, as the polychromy is too highly abraded. Similarly, the coats of arms on the four other statuettes also fail to warrant a proper identification. Equally uncertain is to what extent these coats of arms have been preserved in their original state. The right half of the escutcheon on Adrian’s console bears Arma Christi (cross, spear, reed with sponge, flagellum, whip), a star and a moon, but according to Borchgrave d’Altena, these are later additions.15J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. p. 67, fig. 64. A comparable heraldic composition with Arma Christi appears in an engraving by the Master of the Amsterdam Cabinet from c. 1475-89 (see inv. no. RP-P-OB-912. For more examples, see R. Berliner, ‘Arma Christi’, Münchner Jahrbuch der bildenden Kunst 6 (1955), pp. 35-152, passim. In the illustrations accompanying Borchgrave d’Altena and Halsema-Kubes, St Christopher’s escutcheon is fully intact. With a little effort, one can discern a chevron and a cross. In more recent images, however, the escutcheon’s left half is missing.16J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. p. 67, fig. 64; W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88, esp. fig. 6; C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, p. 133, fig. 13. With the Anthony, the letters ‘CF’ and three roses (?) are visible in the upper half of the escutcheon; the three alike figures on the upper right of Roch’s escutcheon possibly represent the three pales of the Mechelen municipal coat of arms.17R. De Roo, ‘Mechelse beeldhouwkunst’, in J. Crab et al., Aspekten van de Laatgotiek in Brabant, exh. cat. Leuven (Stedelijk Museum) 1971, pp. 418-71, esp. p. 424.
Titia de Haseth Möller, 2024
Literature
R.L. Wyss, ‘Der heilige Sebastian’, Bericht über die Tätigkeit der Eidgenössischen Kommission der Gottfried-Keller-Stiftung 1969/72, pp. 67-77; Jaarverslag Rijksmuseum 1971, pp. 26-27; R.L. Wyss, ‘Eine Mechelner Kleinplastik im Bernischen Historischen Museum’, Jahrbuch des Bernischen Historischen Museums 51/52 (1971-72), pp. 199-204; J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, no. 172, with earlier literature
Citation
T. de Haseth Möller, 2024, 'anonymous, St Sebastian, Mechelen, c. 1525', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.24453
(accessed 10 May 2025 14:44:29).Figures
Footnotes
- 1T. de Haseth Möller, ‘Anonymous, St Sebastian, Mechelen, c. 1525’, in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam 2020.
- 2Contrary to at least three of the other sculptures from the same ensemble, the St Sebastian does not appear to have been moved to the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe-Gasthuis’ new complex on the Keizerstraat in Mechelen in 1857-58, see T. de Haseth Möller, ‘Anonymous, St Sebastian, Mechelen, c. 1525’, in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam 2020.
- 3Halsema-Kubes described the Amsterdam Sebastian as the sole example (W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88, esp. p. 183). Wyss additionally cited a small Sebastian in Bern, in the tradition of the poupeés de Malines (R.L. Wyss, ‘Der heilige Sebastian’, Bericht über die Tätigkeit der Eidgenössischen Kommission der Gottfried-Keller-Stiftung 1969/72, pp. 67-77). A third, likewise early statuette was formerly held in the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe Gasthuis in Mechelen (A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96). The Sebastian from the series of plague saints in the old Sint-Pieterskerk in Mechelen dates from the third quarter of the 16th century (C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, p. 143, no. 24). Dating from the same period is a Mechelen alabaster relief of Sebastian’s martyrdom, preserved in Antwerp, Museum Mayer van den Bergh (J. De Coo (ed.), Catalogus 2: Beeldhouwkunst, plaketten, antiek, coll. cat. Antwerp (Museum Mayer van den Bergh) 1969, no. 2300).
- 4J. Jansen, ‘Mechelse rondsculptuur in hout tijdens de Renaissance: De studie van twee modellen’, in C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, p. 19.
- 5Compare for example to the late fifteenth-century Sebastian in Paris, Musée du Louvre, inv. no. RF 2320, and Dismas, the Penitent Thief of c. 1530 in Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, inv. no. BK-16547-A.
- 6Mechelen, Museum Hof van Busleyden, on loan from the OCMW (Public Centre for Social Welfare), inv. nos. B2 to B5, see KIK-IRPA, object nos. 99150 (Anthony Abbot), 115664 (Christopher), 115666 (Adrian) and 115667 (Roch). See also, for example A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96; J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. 67-71; W. Godenne, ‘Préliminaires à l’inventaire général des statuettes d’origine malinoise, présumées des XVe et XVIe siècles’, Bulletin du Cercle Archéologique, Littéraire et Artistique de Malines 64 (1960), pp. 108-29, esp. pp. 108-12, figs. 64-66, 69; W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88, esp. figs. 5-8; C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, nos. 10-13.
- 7Cf. W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88. The fingers on Sebastian’s left hand are non-original and cannot be compared to those of Anthony.
- 8Findings based on a comparison between the Amsterdam Sebastian and images of the other four sculptures in the database of KIK-IRPA, object nos. 99150 (Anthony Abbot), 115664 (Christopher), 115666 (Adrian) and 115667 (Roch).
- 9W. Godenne, ‘Préliminaires à l’inventaire général des statuettes d’origine malinoise, présumées des XVe et XVIe siècles’, Bulletin du Cercle Archéologique, Littéraire et Artistique de Malines 64 (1960), pp. 108-29, esp. p. 109.
- 10Mechelen, OCMW (Public Centre for Social Welfare), inv. no. G 17, see KIK-IRPA, object no. 99029.
- 11A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96.
- 12op een blok met wapenschild een klein houten beeld van den H. Sebastiaan…van het gotiek tijdstip…; A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96.
- 13A. Willocx, De gasthuisnonnen te Mechelen: Het O.L. Vrouw Gasthuis, Mechelen 1895, p. 96.
- 14W. Godenne, ‘Préliminaires à l’inventaire général des statuettes d’origine malinoise, présumées des XVe et XVIe siècles’, Bulletin du Cercle Archéologique, Littéraire et Artistique de Malines 64 (1960), pp. 108-29, esp. p. 108; J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. p. 69.
- 15J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. p. 67, fig. 64. A comparable heraldic composition with Arma Christi appears in an engraving by the Master of the Amsterdam Cabinet from c. 1475-89 (see inv. no. RP-P-OB-912. For more examples, see R. Berliner, ‘Arma Christi’, Münchner Jahrbuch der bildenden Kunst 6 (1955), pp. 35-152, passim.
- 16J. de Borchgrave d’Altena, ‘Statuettes Malinoises’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis 31 (1959), pp. 2-97, esp. p. 67, fig. 64; W. Halsema-Kubes, ‘Een Mechelse H. Sebastiaan’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 19 (1971), pp. 183-88, esp. fig. 6; C. Ceulemans et al., Mechels houtsnijwerk in de eeuw van keizer Karel, exh. cat. Mechelen (Museum Schepenhuis) 2000, p. 133, fig. 13.
- 17R. De Roo, ‘Mechelse beeldhouwkunst’, in J. Crab et al., Aspekten van de Laatgotiek in Brabant, exh. cat. Leuven (Stedelijk Museum) 1971, pp. 418-71, esp. p. 424.