Getting started with the collection:
Jan van Scorel (possibly copy after)
Portrait of René de Chalon
Low Countries, after 1542
Inscriptions
- inscription, on the frame:RENE DE CHALON PRINCE DORENGES. CONTE DE NASSOU. ec. AIGE DE XXIII ANS. 1542.(René de Chalon, Prince of Orange, Count of Nassau etc. aged 23. 1542.)
Technical notes
The support is a single round panel, probably of limewood (information from Peter Klein). On the reverse there are two mechanically produced vertical grooves on the left and right (see also SK-A-4027). The ground, which is probably white, extends to the edges of the panel, and was applied with broad brushstrokes that are visible through the paint layers. Infrared reflectography shows a schematic underdrawing of contour lines, which may indicate the use of a cartoon. The face was left in reserve. The paint was applied in thin layers, and the flesh tones were painted wet in wet.
Scientific examination and reports
- condition report: W. de Ridder, RMA, 19 april 2006
- infrared reflectography: M. Wolters / M. Leeflang [2], RKD/RMA, no. RKDG390, 19 april 2006
Condition
Good. There are two vertical cracks in the support. The paint layer is slightly abraded, especially in the dark areas, and the retouching underneath the chin is discoloured.
Original framing
The portrait is mounted in a tondo frame with a shallow entablature profile. The cross-section of the profile shows a fillet and a jump, a fillet, a reverse ogee, a plain frieze, a jump and a fillet, a bead, a fillet and a jump, an ogee, a jump, a fillet and a jump at the sight edge (fig. a). The round frame was made out of one piece of wood, probably walnut, with an inscription in off-white paint.
Provenance
…; ? estate inventory, Kasteel Buren, 1675/1712, ‘in the great hall’, with pendant (probably SK-A-4027), nos. 13.5, 13.6 (‘Noch Renée de Chalon met Sijne princesse, beyde in profijl.’);1Drossaers/Lunsingh Scheurleer I, 1974, p. 555. ? estate inventory, Kasteel Buren, 1759, ‘The large upper hall’, no. 151 (‘Seven schilderije, pourtraiten’);2Drossaers/Lunsingh Scheurleer II, 1974, p. 545. estate inventory, Stadholder’s Court, The Hague, 1763/64, no. 4 (‘Een portrait met dit opschrift in de lijst: René de Chalon d’Orange, comte de Nassou, agé de 23 ans, 1542, NB., in een ronde bruyne lijst, 5½ D. Bij 5½ D. [14 by 14 cm]’);3Drossaers/Lunsingh Scheurleer III, 1976, p. 29. recorded ‘in the writing cabinet’ of Willem V (1748-1806), Prince of Orange;4Inscription on an undated etching after this portrait by Reinier Vinkeles (RP-P-1937-1310) ...; ? transferred to the Koninklijk Kabinet van Zeldzaamheden, The Hague, c. 1816;5Note RMA; Kruijsen 2002, pp. 62-63. from whom acquired by the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague (inv. no. 193), 1874-75; transferred to the museum, 1885; on loan to the Vereniging Oranje-Nassau Museum, The Hague, 1926-32
ObjectNumber: SK-A-4462
The artist
Biography
Jan van Scorel (Schoorl 1495 - Utrecht 1562), workshop of
Jan van Scorel was born in 1495, according to Karel van Mander, in the village of Schoorl northwest of Alkmaar, the natural son of a priest, Andries Ouckeyn, and Dieuwer Aertsdr. He died in Utrecht in 1562 and was buried in the Mariakerk, where a funerary monument was erected that contained a portrait of Scorel by his pupil, Antonio Moro. Van Mander praised Scorel for having visited Italy, returning with a new and more beautiful manner of painting; and the artist is still recognised today for the widespread influence that his Italianate style had in the northern Netherlands.
Jan van Scorel was not only a painter but also a canon. His church office in the Mariakerk, Utrecht, prohibited him from marrying, but his will (1537) tells us that he lived with Agatha van Schoonhoven as his common-law wife; the date 1529 on Scorel’s portrait of her must mark the period when the two met.6Rome, Galeria Doria Pamphilj; illustrated in ENP XII, 1975, no. 255, pl. 189. One of the couple’s six children, Peter (c. 1530-1622) became a painter. Van Mander’s remark that Scorel ‘was very familiar with and liked by all the great lords of the Netherlands,’ is almost an understatement. The artist built up an influential network among the clergy, beginning with Pope Adrian VI, the artist’s protector when he arrived in Rome around 1522, and including Herman van Lokhorst, dean of Oudmunster (St Saviour), Scorel’s first, important patron in Utrecht, and other fellow ecclesiastics. In addition, Scorel had high court connections. In the negotiations surrounding his canonry, Scorel’s sponsors were none other than the stadholders Henry III of Nassau-Breda and Floris of Egmond, the most powerful nobles at the Court of Holland at the time. In c. 1532-33, Scorel visited the courts at Breda and Mechelen, where he met the neo-Latin poet, Janus Secundus, and was at the court in Brussels around 1552. Scorel also worked for the municipality of Utrecht and received payments from the city for his activities associated with the triumphal entries into Utrecht of Charles V (1540) and Philip II (1549).
Van Mander provides us with the most credible account of Scorel’s training. After attending the Latin School in Alkmaar until c. 1509, Scorel apprenticed for three years with Cornelis Willemsz in Haarlem (who was also Maarten van Heemskerck’s master). He then moved to Amsterdam around 1512, where he became an assistant in Jacob Cornelisz van Oostsanen’s workshop. Van Mander also reports that Scorel studied briefly with Jan Gossart, who came to Utrecht after his protector, Philip of Burgundy, had been elected bishop in 1517. By 1518-19 Scorel left the Netherlands on a long journey whose route was described in detail by Karel van Mander, eventually taking the painter to Venice, the Holy Land and Rome.
Scorel’s stays in both Venice and Rome can be construed as a continuation of his training, for he was profoundly influenced by his new surroundings. After returning to Venice from his pilgrimage to Jerusalem around 1520, Scorel painted a number of portraits and landscapes, and he may have ventured on to Rome when the Utrecht native, Adriaan Florisz Boeyens, was elected pope in January 1522. According to Van Mander, Scorel not only had access to antique statuary as overseer of the Vatican collections in the Belvedere, an appointment he received from Pope Adrian VI, he was also able to make drawings after Raphael, Michelangelo and the works of other Italian masters. Adrian VI’s promise to Scorel of a canonry in Utrecht led the artist to settle there in 1524 after his return from Rome.
Van Mander’s life of Jan van Scorel is the primary source for the reconstruction of the painter’s oeuvre. He knew, for instance, that during his early travels, the painter worked for nobility in Carinthia (Austria), where Scorel’s first signed and dated painting, the 1519 Holy Kinship altarpiece, can still be seen today.7Obervellach, St Martin’s; illustrated in ENP XII, 1975, no. 298, pls. 160-62. The major touchstone of Scorel’s first years in Utrecht, the Triptych with the Entry of Christ into Jerusalem painted as a memorial for members of the Lokhorst family around 1526,8Utrecht, Centraal Museum; illustrated in coll. cat. Utrecht 2009, no. 21. is described at length by Van Mander. When Jan van Scorel moved to Haarlem (1527-30), Van Mander tells us that he was received by Simon van Sanen, Commander of the Knights of St John. Both Van Mander’s account and the inventories of the order mention a number of key works that Scorel completed during this period: The Baptism of Christ, Adam and Eve9Both in Haarlem, Frans Hals Museum; illustrated in coll. cat. Haarlem 2006, p. 601, no. 425, p. 605, no. 427. and Mary Magdalen (SK-A-372). Scorel’s Haarlem period was an extremely critical and productive one: he established his basic repertoire of subjects, received more prestigious commissions, such as the Crucifixion Altarpiece for the Oude Kerk in Amsterdam (now lost), rented a house and took on students, among them Maarten van Heemskerck, and expanded and standardised the operations of his workshop.
Scorel’s ‘most flourishing period’, according to Karel van Mander, followed upon the artist’s return to Utrecht by September 1530. Unfortunately, many of the works Van Mander describes from this period have been lost. The Finding of the True Cross triptych, probably commissioned by Henry III of Nassau-Breda in the mid-1530s, has survived, although in poor condition.10Breda, Grote Kerk; illustrated in ENP XII, 1975, no. 302, pl. 165. Some remarkable discoveries were made in the late 20th century of altarpieces executed by Scorel and his shop around 1540 for the abbey of Marchiennes in what is now northern France. Fragments survive from an Altarpiece with St Ursula and the 11,000 Virgins, and the Polyptych with Sts James the Greater and Stephen lacks only one wing.11Both in Douai, Museé de La Chartreuse; illustrated in Faries 1975, p. 115, figs. 15a-b, pp. 112-13, figs. 14a-c. These works, along with the Landscape with Bathsheba of c. 1540-45 (SK-A-670), provide us with a better understanding of Scorel’s late style. His oeuvre consists of some 60 extant paintings, between 20 and 25 drawings, and 6 designs for prints.
In addition to Maarten van Heemskerck, Antonio Moro and Scorel’s son Peter were apprentices in Scorel’s shop. Others, such as Lambert Sustris, may have had brief contact with his workshop as assistants.
Van Mander describes Scorel as the typical uomo universale of his time. He was skilled in languages, wrote poetry as well as songs, acted as an amateur archaeologist and marine engineer, and participated in an ambitious land development scheme, the reclamation of the Zijpe in north Holland.
References
Lampsonius 1572 (1956), no. 17; Buchelius 1583-1639 (1928), pp. 21, 26-30, 52, 63-64; Van Mander 1604, fols. 234r-36v; Muller 1880; Justi 1881, pp. 193-210; Scheibler/Bode 1881, pp. 211-14; Hoogewerff 1923a; Friedländer XII, 1935, pp. 118-56; Hoogewerff in Thieme/Becker XXX, 1936, pp. 401-04; Hoogewerff IV, 1941-42, pp. 23-191; ENP XII, 1975, pp. 65-81; Faries 1970, pp. 2-24 (documents); Faries 1972; Faries in Amsterdam 1986a, pp. 179-80; Miedema III, 1996, pp. 268-90; Faries in Turner 1996, XXVIII, pp. 215-29; Faries 1997, pp. 107-16; Van Thiel-Stroman in coll. cat. Haarlem 2006, pp. 303-04; Faries in coll. cat. Utrecht 2009, biography accompanying no. 20
(M. Faries)
Entry
According to the inscription on its frame, this bust-length portrait shows the Prince of Orange and Count of Nassau, René de Chalon at the age of 23. He wears a white shirt, which is ruffled at the collar, underneath a black doublet with pink sleeves and gold buttons. Around his neck hangs a double gold chain.
This painting forms a pair with a portrait of René’s wife Anne of Lorraine (SK-A-4027). While the inscription on an etched copy of René’s portrait (RP-P-1937-1310) locates it in the stadholder’s collection, the portrait of Anna is not securely documented until 1960, when it was bought by the Rijksmuseum and reunited with that of her husband.12See Provenance.
Anne is depicted in a black dress embellished with gold detailing and pearls. A gold chain strung with pearls hangs around her neck. Beneath her black gown, the collar of her chemise has a ruffled edge and is embroidered with geometric patterns in intricate blackwork. Her hair is gathered in puffs at the ears; her gold hairnet and small black bonnet with a white plume are a fashion derived from Spain and Italy.13With thanks to Marieke de Winkel for this information.
Based on the painting technique as well as the underdrawing, both images appear to be by the same hand and are executed on similar limewood panels.14It is noteworthy that limewood was very rarely used as a support in Netherlandish panel painting. It was far more common in Germany; see Klein 2003, pp. 72-73. Anne’s panel has been trimmed around the edge and is now slightly smaller than its companion, but originally it was probably the same size. The strong profiles of the sitters and the tondo format evoke the appearance of ancient coins and portrait medallions.15Utrecht 1977, pp. 67-68, no. 17.
René was born in Breda on 5 February 1519 to Hendrik III of Nassau and Claudia de Châlon. From the latter he would inherit the ample princedom of Orange. He was Stadholder of Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht and Gelderland under Emperor Charles V. His wife Anne, daughter of the Duke of Lorraine, was born on 22 July 1522. The couple married on 20 August 1540 and settled in Breda shortly afterwards. On 17 July 1544, René died in the Battle of St Dizier in France. Four years later, Anne married her second husband, Philippe III de Croy, the first Duke of Aarschot. She died on 22 August 1568.16Mijnssen 1951, pp. 75-94; Jansen 1979, pp. 37-39, 43; see also Van Goor 1744, pp. 34-35, for an earlier and particularly effusive biography of the prince composed for Stadholder Willem IV, one of the presumed former owners of the Rijksmuseum portrait of René.
A related pair of portraits of René and Anne survives in the Stedelijk Museum in Diest.17Vermeir in Ghent 2000, pp. 199-200, no. 49 (ill.). For subsequent copies after the Diest portraits, see Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 61-62. In these images, the costumes and physiognomies of the couple are portrayed in a manner nearly identical to those in the Amsterdam tondo portraits. The images in Diest and Amsterdam would thus seem to follow a common model. They can be dated to the second half of the 16th century on the evidence of the painting technique.
The earliest documented reference to a portrait of René (‘’t conterfeytsel van René Desschalon’) appears in a 1590 inventory of Breda Palace.18Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 62-63. Subsequent 17th-century inventories refer to pairs of portraits of both René and Anne.19Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 63-64. The 1632 inventory of the palace at Noordeinde refers to ‘twee schilderien van Rhené de Chalon ende sijn gemael, staende in perfijl’ (two paintings of René de Châlon and his wife, standing in profile), and the inventory of the castle in Buren from 1675 lists portraits of ‘Renée de Chalon met Sijne princesse, beyde in profijl’ (René de Châlon and his princess, both in profile). Some works of art were transferred from Breda to Buren in the early 17th century, so Van Luttervelt has suggested that these two references might be to the same image of René, but this does not account for the fact that the 1590 inventory refers only to a portrait of René and not to an accompanying one of Anne. An original pair of portraits of the couple may have been divided after René’s death and Anne’s remarriage. Such a scenario would explain why René’s portrait is listed alone in the Breda inventory, and why it appears without the accompanying portrait of Anne in the collection of the stadholders. Unfortunately, it is impossible to sort out which of these inventory records might refer to the Amsterdam portraits, or which refer instead to their counterparts in Diest or a lost original pair.
Van Luttervelt has argued that the original images of the couple were painted by Jan van Scorel or one of his assistants in Breda during the first half of 1542, the year inscribed on the original frame of René’s tondo portrait in Amsterdam.20Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 64-67, 75, unconvincingly identifies one particular student of Scorel named Cornelis Cornelisz Buys II as the possible author of the portraits. Scorel and René are both documented in Breda during this period.21Hoogewerff 1923a, pp. 81-82; Mijnssen 1951, pp. 90-91. Moreover, Van Mander records that the artist produced ‘several works’ for René and his father, which most probably included the surviving triptych of The Finding of the True Cross in Breda’s Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk.22Miedema I, 1994, pp. 202-03, fol. 236r; Helmus 2003, pp. 234-39; Stumpel 2005, p. 110. As such, a link between Scorel and the original portraits of René and Anne seems plausible, but the attribution remains speculative at this time.
(M. Bass)
Literature
Moes II, 1905, no. 6326:2; Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 60-67; Utrecht 1977, pp. 67-68, no. 17
Collection catalogues
1903, p. 15, no. 146 (as Dutch school, first half 16th century); 1934, p. 13, no. 146; 1960, p. 11, no. 146 (as Dutch school, 16th century); 1976, p. 648, no. A 4462 (as Netherlands school ?, 1542)
Citation
M. Bass, 2010, 'possibly copy after Jan van Scorel, Portrait of René de Chalon, after 1542 - 1542', in J.P. Filedt Kok (ed.), Early Netherlandish Paintings, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.10358
(accessed 22 May 2025 21:09:31).Footnotes
- 1Drossaers/Lunsingh Scheurleer I, 1974, p. 555.
- 2Drossaers/Lunsingh Scheurleer II, 1974, p. 545.
- 3Drossaers/Lunsingh Scheurleer III, 1976, p. 29.
- 4Inscription on an undated etching after this portrait by Reinier Vinkeles (RP-P-1937-1310)
- 5Note RMA; Kruijsen 2002, pp. 62-63.
- 6Rome, Galeria Doria Pamphilj; illustrated in ENP XII, 1975, no. 255, pl. 189.
- 7Obervellach, St Martin’s; illustrated in ENP XII, 1975, no. 298, pls. 160-62.
- 8Utrecht, Centraal Museum; illustrated in coll. cat. Utrecht 2009, no. 21.
- 9Both in Haarlem, Frans Hals Museum; illustrated in coll. cat. Haarlem 2006, p. 601, no. 425, p. 605, no. 427.
- 10Breda, Grote Kerk; illustrated in ENP XII, 1975, no. 302, pl. 165.
- 11Both in Douai, Museé de La Chartreuse; illustrated in Faries 1975, p. 115, figs. 15a-b, pp. 112-13, figs. 14a-c.
- 12See Provenance.
- 13With thanks to Marieke de Winkel for this information.
- 14It is noteworthy that limewood was very rarely used as a support in Netherlandish panel painting. It was far more common in Germany; see Klein 2003, pp. 72-73.
- 15Utrecht 1977, pp. 67-68, no. 17.
- 16Mijnssen 1951, pp. 75-94; Jansen 1979, pp. 37-39, 43; see also Van Goor 1744, pp. 34-35, for an earlier and particularly effusive biography of the prince composed for Stadholder Willem IV, one of the presumed former owners of the Rijksmuseum portrait of René.
- 17Vermeir in Ghent 2000, pp. 199-200, no. 49 (ill.). For subsequent copies after the Diest portraits, see Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 61-62.
- 18Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 62-63.
- 19Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 63-64.
- 20Van Luttervelt 1962, pp. 64-67, 75, unconvincingly identifies one particular student of Scorel named Cornelis Cornelisz Buys II as the possible author of the portraits.
- 21Hoogewerff 1923a, pp. 81-82; Mijnssen 1951, pp. 90-91.
- 22Miedema I, 1994, pp. 202-03, fol. 236r; Helmus 2003, pp. 234-39; Stumpel 2005, p. 110.