Isack Elyas

A Festive Company

1629

Inscriptions

  • signature and date, bottom right:Isack Elyas ƒ. 1629

Technical notes

The support consists of two horizontally grained oak planks and is bevelled on all sides. The ground layer is transparent and yellowish. Red paint seems to have been used for the dead-colouring. The background was painted before the figures. Some finishing touches were later added in the background. The paint layers were applied smoothly and the figures display prominent brushmarking. There are several small pentimenti, in the tablecloth, for example, and in the young man in red.


Scientific examination and reports

  • infrared photography: G. Tauber, RMA, 1997
  • condition report: M. van de Laar, RMA, 1 februari 2005

Condition

Good. There is a stable crack approximately 8 cm long at bottom left.


Conservation

  • W. Hesterman, 1972: retouchings removed; retouched
  • G. Tauber, 1994: loose paint consolidated; retouchings corrected; revarnished
  • M. van de Laar, 1994: loose paint consolidated; retouchings corrected; revarnished
  • G. Tauber, 1997: complete restoration

Provenance

...; bequeathed to the museum by Daniel Franken Dzn (1838-98), Amsterdam and Le Vésinet, 1898

ObjectNumber: SK-A-1754

Credit line: D. Franken Bequest, Le Vésinet


The artist

Biography

Isack Elyas (active 1629)

Isack Elyas (or Isaac Elias) was a Dutch genre painter active around 1629, probably in Haarlem. Nothing else is known about him, and the Rijksmuseum’s painting is his only signed work. No other ones can be attributed to him with any degree of certainty. A few small, unsigned portraits on copper from the 1620s have been associated with him, but the resemblance is not that great.1Portrait of a Man and a Woman, dated 1622, present whereabouts unknown; Portrait of a Woman, dated 1629, present whereabouts unknown; photos RKD.

Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007

References
Von Bode 1883, p. 164; Lelienfeld in Thieme/Becker X, 1914, p. 456


Entry

A merry group of revellers are seated around a covered table and drink, talk, sing or make music. Several of the figures look out at the viewer. The elegant pair on the far right appear to have been set somewhat apart from the rest, and on that evidence De Jongh has suggested that they are the portraits of an engaged couple.2De Jongh in Haarlem 1986, p. 66. There are quite a few 17th-century paintings in which genre-like scenes seem to have been combined with portraits. Jan Miense Molenaer, for instance, regularly placed a distinguished pair off to one side of the main scene, looking on. Sometimes these are portraits, sometimes not. That the two people on the right of Elyas’s painting are not married but betrothed is clear from their relative positions, the man being on the heraldic left and the woman on the heraldic right.3De Jongh in Haarlem 1986, p. 66. These positions are usually reversed in portraits of married couples.

It is likely that the other figures, who are engaged in a variety of actions, symbolize the five senses. The lutenist probably represents Hearing, the man singing on the left with a text in his hand stands for Sight, the man holding a glass upside down Taste, the young man standing with a hat in one hand and a glass in the other Feeling, and the woman with a dog on her lap Smell.4Amsterdam 1976, pp. 112-15; Schipper 2000, I, pp. 71-72.

There is a long tradition of depictions of the five senses, which were usually represented by stock personifications and attributes in the 16th century, but in the 17th century could be symbolized in a variety of ways. That is one reason why it is often difficult to realize that the figures personify the senses. In addition, they were increasingly shown in contemporary dress and settings, as is the case here.5Amsterdam 1976, pp. 112-15; Schipper 2000, I, p. 271.

Scenes of the five senses were often moralistic and admonitory. The paintings hanging on the walls behind this merry company indicate that this might be the case here, for The Flood and The Battle between the Israelites and the Moabites can be taken as warnings to the viewer, as well as to the elegant couple on the right against excessive sensual pleasures.6Amsterdam 1976, p. 114; Wuhrmann 1995, p. 152.

Until now the date on Elyas’s panel was wrongly read as 1620, but examination under the microscope has shown that it is 1629. There are no other genre paintings by the artist, but the style and composition bear some resemblance to those of Willem Buytewech and Dirck Hals. It is possible that the composition of Buytewech’s Elegant Couples on a Terrace (SK-A-3038) may have served as a model.7cf. Playter 1972, p. 58.

Based on the similarities between the present painting and Jan Miense Molenaer’s Allegory of Marital Fidelity,8Richmond, Virginia Museum of Fine Art, Williams collection; illustrated in Raleigh etc. 2002, p. 103. Weller has suggested that Elyas may have been Molenaer’s teacher.9Weller in Raleigh etc. 2002, p. 105. Although there is indeed a resemblance between the two paintings, the lack of comparable works makes it impossible to put Weller’s hypothesis to the test.

Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007

See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements

This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 69.


Literature

Amsterdam 1976, pp. 112-15, no. 23; De Jongh in Haarlem 1986, p. 66, no. 1; Wuhrman 1995


Collection catalogues

1903, p. 96, no. 901; 1934, p. 95, no. 901; 1960, p. 95, no. 901; 1976, p. 220, no. A 1754 (dated as 1620); 2007, no. 69


Citation

E. Korthals Altes, 2007, 'Isaac Elias, A Festive Company, 1629', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.8384

(accessed 13 August 2025 19:19:09).

Footnotes

  • 1Portrait of a Man and a Woman, dated 1622, present whereabouts unknown; Portrait of a Woman, dated 1629, present whereabouts unknown; photos RKD.
  • 2De Jongh in Haarlem 1986, p. 66.
  • 3De Jongh in Haarlem 1986, p. 66.
  • 4Amsterdam 1976, pp. 112-15; Schipper 2000, I, pp. 71-72.
  • 5Amsterdam 1976, pp. 112-15; Schipper 2000, I, p. 271.
  • 6Amsterdam 1976, p. 114; Wuhrmann 1995, p. 152.
  • 7cf. Playter 1972, p. 58.
  • 8Richmond, Virginia Museum of Fine Art, Williams collection; illustrated in Raleigh etc. 2002, p. 103.
  • 9Weller in Raleigh etc. 2002, p. 105.