Getting started with the collection:
Diana the Huntress
after sculpture by Johan Larson (attributed to), c. 1700 - c. 1725
Diana, goddess of the hunt, is shown here is full flow. The figure is based on a white marble Diana made in Ancient Rome which is now at the Louvre. This lead sculpture stood in a garden in the North Holland town of Monnickendam until around 1900.
- Artwork typetuinbeeld
- Object numberBK-B-99
- Dimensionsheight 158 cm x weight 420 kg (statue), width 55 cm x depth 57 cm (sandstone base)
- Physical characteristicslead
Identification
Title(s)
- Diana the Huntress
- Diana Hunting
Object type
Object number
BK-B-99
Description
Op een vierkante plint is Diana, in voortsnellende houding uitgebeeld. Zij staat iets voorover op het linkerbeen en heeft de rechtervoet achterwaarts en van de grond. Met de ene hand grijpt zij naar achteren over de schouder heen naar een pijl in de op haar rug hangende pijlenkoker, in de andere hand houdt zij de boog. Zij wordt aan haar linker zijde vergezeld door een hazewind, die naar haar opziet. Zij draagt een diadeem en sandalen en is gekleed in een ruim hangende chiton, die bij het middel is opgenomen en gedeeltelijk schuil gaat onder de opgerolde mantel, die van haar linker schouder afhangt en rond het middel gewonden is.
Creation
Creation
- after sculpture by Johan Larson (attributed to)
- caster: anonymous, Northern Netherlands
Dating
c. 1700 - c. 1725
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
lead
Dimensions
- height 158 cm x weight 420 kg (statue)
- width 55 cm x depth 57 cm (sandstone base)
Acquisition and rights
Credit line
Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt
Acquisition
purchase 1910-02
Copyright
Provenance
…; Pieter Sligcher (1829-1869), Monnickendam;{Note RMA. Pieter Sligcher was the co-owner of Sligcher & Co., timber merchants in Monnickendam and Nieuwendam.} his daughter Dina Adriana Sligcher (1854-1935) and her husband Albertus Hendrik Cramer (1846-1917), Edam, 1869;{Cramer was a notary public in Edam from 1877 to 1909, see _Nederland’s Patriciaat_ 75 (1991), p. 18. He probably moved in 1909 or 1910 from Edam to Hilversum (34 Koninginneweg), where he died. According to the _Utrechts Nieuwsblad_ of 23 May 1910, p. 6, the municipality of Edam purchased ‘the now empty house of notary Cramer, with splendid garden, veranda, etc.’ The statue of Diana would also have changed hands then.} …; from collection D. de Vos, fl. 1,225, to the museum, with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt, 1910
Documentation
R. van Oven, 'Tuinsierkunst in de 18de eeuw', Buiten 9 (1915), p. 584.
Related objects
Related
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!
Johan Larson (attributed to)
Diana Hunting
Northern Netherlands, c. 1700 - c. 1725
Technical notes
The statue is hollow cast and has a wall thickness of c. 5 to 10 mm. The group has been cast in pieces, which have been soldered together. The joints have been carefully tooled, making them virtually invisible; a wide, double, horizontal join can still be vaguely discerned round Diana’s waist. The quiver was cast separately and attached loosely to Diana’s back with a hook. In 2012-13 the remains of an old, square, cast iron fixture rod were found in the supporting leg; other fixtures were removed during earlier restorations.
Scientific examination and reports
- conservation report: Dr Maximilian Heimler and Dr Regina Lichtmaneker, Haber & Brandner Metallrestaurierung, Regensburg, 2013
Condition
There is an accompanying sandstone pedestal from the first half of the 18th century (BK-B-99-1).
Conservation
- P. Hasseveld, Amersfoort, 1962: cracks in the left leg (supporting leg) were repaired.
- Arjen Smolenaars, RMA, 2001: cracks in the dog’s paws were repaired.
- M. Heimler, Haber & Brandner Metallrestaurierung, Regensburg, augustus 2012 - maart 2013: thorough restoration, including the introduction of a stainless-steel armature in the statue; the surface was cleaned, scaling removed and retouched with pigmented wax. This conservation work was carried out with financial support from the Patrons of the Rijksmuseum.
Provenance
…; Pieter Sligcher (1829-1869), Monnickendam;1Note RMA. Pieter Sligcher was the co-owner of Sligcher & Co., timber merchants in Monnickendam and Nieuwendam. his daughter Dina Adriana Sligcher (1854-1935) and her husband Albertus Hendrik Cramer (1846-1917), Edam, 1869;2Cramer was a notary public in Edam from 1877 to 1909, see Nederland’s Patriciaat 75 (1991), p. 18. He probably moved in 1909 or 1910 from Edam to Hilversum (34 Koninginneweg), where he died. According to the Utrechts Nieuwsblad of 23 May 1910, p. 6, the municipality of Edam purchased ‘the now empty house of notary Cramer, with splendid garden, veranda, etc.’ The statue of Diana would also have changed hands then. …; from collection D. de Vos, fl. 1,225, to the museum, with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt, 1910
Object number: BK-B-99
Credit line: Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt
Entry
With the growing demand for garden sculpture in the Republic during the seventeenth century, a substantial industry for the casting of lead figures developed. The leading artists were members of the Larson family, working alternately in The Hague and London, followed by Arent de Rijp (1659-?) from Delft, Barent Dronrijp (working in the second half of the seventeenth century) from Delft and Amsterdam, and lastly Jonas Gutsche (1624-c. 1677) and his son Andries Gutsche in The Hague. George Larson (working in London c. 1634-1654), Willem (‘Guillaume’) Larson (documented in The Hague 1647-1660) and his son the statuarius (sculptor) Johan (d. 1664) can be seen as the pioneers of this branch of statuary-founding in the Republic. George Larson worked in England, possibly with the court sculptor Hubert le Sueur (c. 1580-1658). Thanks to their purveyance to the English court, the court of the Stadholder in The Hague, his entourage, the Elector in Berlin and a wide range of Dutch and German aristocratic patrons, they dominated most of the market for reproductive sculpture of this type in north-west Europe.3F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89.
It is likely that this lead Diana figure was cast after a model by Johan Larson, which can be deduced from the fact that an identical lead statue was situated at Elswout, near Overveen, the country residence of the Amsterdam merchant Gabriel Marselis (1609-1673). His descendants sold various effects from Elswout in 1719, including ‘a Diana with her dog over 7 feet in height’. It was purchased by Vincent van der Vinne for 143 guilders. In the margin of the sales document the sculptor’s name (Johan Larson) was noted.4een Diana met haar hondt hoog ruijm 7 voet. E. de Jong and C. Schellekens, Het beeld buiten: Vier eeuwen tuinsculptuur in Nederland, exh. cat. Heino/Wijhe (Kasteel ’t Nijenhuis) 1994, p. 95; F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 67. The fact that this refers to the same model as the Rijksmuseum figure is confirmed by a bird’s eye view painting of Elswout’s garden, attributed to Jan van der Heijden, in which a number of white garden statues can be seen, with Diana plus dog in the middle.5E. de Jong and C. Schellekens, Het beeld buiten: Vier eeuwen tuinsculptuur in Nederland, exh. cat. Heino/Wijhe (Kasteel ’t Nijenhuis) 1994, p. 95. The height mentioned of over 7 feet (c. 2 metres) probably relates to the statue including the pedestal. Another Diana in lead, most likely also by Johan Larson, stood in the gardens of the stadholder’s palace at Noordeinde in The Hague, as is apparent from a poetic description of the palace garden by Jacob de Hennin of 1681.6F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 65; F. Scholten, ‘Andries Gutsche’s loden tuinsculpturen voor Huis Bergh’, in M. Reintjes and A. Vels Heijn (eds.), De oudste tuin van Nederland: De groene geschiedenis van Huis Bergh, 's-Heerenberg 2016, pp. 79-93, p. 81. Lastly, a plaster version of Diana was mentioned among Larson’s bequeathed effects in 1664.7F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 58.
In that year, the majority of Larson’s workshop inventory, including the models and moulds, was purchased by the Delft statuary founder, Arent de Rijp which gave the Larson compositions a second life. With the reselling of moulds and models, compositions like this could be reused far into the eighteenth century. The Amsterdam Diana is one of such third or fourth generation casts, probably based on Johan Larson’s original model. The fact, however, that in 1689 another Hague statue founder, Andries Gutsche (1658-1741), signed a contract for the delivery of two lead statues and a set of eight plaster statues, including a Diana, to be sent to the Swedish court in Stockholm, demonstrates that other Dutch foundries could also provide sculptures of classical deities such as Diana.8J. Römelingh, Een rondgang langs Zweedse archieven, een onderzoek naar archivalia inzake de betrekkingen tussen Nederland en Zweden 1520-1920, The Hague 1986, p. 214. H. Droste, Im Dienst der Krone: Schwedische Diplomaten im 17. Jahrhundert, Münster 2006, p. 391 (B 39).
Larson’s invention is a variant of the Diane chasseuresse or Diana de Versailles in the Louvre, a classical marble statue that has enjoyed great appreciation in Paris since the sixteenth century.9F. Haskell and N. Penny, Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500-1900, New Haven/London 1981, no. 30. The leaping deer accompanying the goddess in the marble, was replaced by a more static greyhound, which was also of Roman derivation and was undoubtedly easier to cast. Johan Larson’s stock also included the model of a lone dog.10F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 58. A single bronze Diana de Versailles, is known to exist, with neither dog nor deer, made by Hubert le Sueur , who cast it for the English King Charles I in 1633.11C. Avery, ‘Hubert le Sueur, the “Unworthy Praxiteles” of Charles I’, in C. Avery, Studies in European Sculpture vol. 2, London 1988, pp. 145-235, esp. 173-76, 209, no. 18, fig. 50c. If George Larson and Le Sueur did work together in London, a model might conceivably have ended up in the Larson’s foundry in The Hague and so formed the basis for Dutch examples, including the Rijksmuseum statue.
Frits Scholten, 2025
Literature
J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, no. 396, with earlier literature; E. de Jong and C. Schellekens, Het beeld buiten: Vier eeuwen tuinsculptuur in Nederland, exh. cat. Heino/Wijhe (Kasteel ’t Nijenhuis) 1994, pp. 94-95; F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), no. 1/2, pp. 54-89, esp. pp. 67-68 and fig. 14; F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Workshop: Reproducing Sculpture in Seventeenth-Century Holland’, in N. Penny, E.D. Schmidt (eds.), Collecting Sculpture in Early Modern Europe: Studies in the History of Art 70, Washington (National Gallery of Art) 2008, pp. 290-99, esp. pp. 296-97 and fig. 10; F. Scholten, ‘Andries Gutsche’s loden tuinsculpturen voor Huis Bergh’, in M. Reintjes and A. Vels Heijn (eds.), De oudste tuin van Nederland: De groene geschiedenis van Huis Bergh, ’s-Heerenberg 2016, pp. 79-93, esp. p. 89 and fig. 7
Citation
F. Scholten, 2025, 'attributed to Johan Larson, Diana Hunting, c. 1700 - c. 1725', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200116107
(accessed 11 December 2025 10:49:50).Footnotes
- 1Note RMA. Pieter Sligcher was the co-owner of Sligcher & Co., timber merchants in Monnickendam and Nieuwendam.
- 2Cramer was a notary public in Edam from 1877 to 1909, see Nederland’s Patriciaat 75 (1991), p. 18. He probably moved in 1909 or 1910 from Edam to Hilversum (34 Koninginneweg), where he died. According to the Utrechts Nieuwsblad of 23 May 1910, p. 6, the municipality of Edam purchased ‘the now empty house of notary Cramer, with splendid garden, veranda, etc.’ The statue of Diana would also have changed hands then.
- 3F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89.
- 4een Diana met haar hondt hoog ruijm 7 voet. E. de Jong and C. Schellekens, Het beeld buiten: Vier eeuwen tuinsculptuur in Nederland, exh. cat. Heino/Wijhe (Kasteel ’t Nijenhuis) 1994, p. 95; F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 67.
- 5E. de Jong and C. Schellekens, Het beeld buiten: Vier eeuwen tuinsculptuur in Nederland, exh. cat. Heino/Wijhe (Kasteel ’t Nijenhuis) 1994, p. 95.
- 6F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 65; F. Scholten, ‘Andries Gutsche’s loden tuinsculpturen voor Huis Bergh’, in M. Reintjes and A. Vels Heijn (eds.), De oudste tuin van Nederland: De groene geschiedenis van Huis Bergh, 's-Heerenberg 2016, pp. 79-93, p. 81.
- 7F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 58.
- 8J. Römelingh, Een rondgang langs Zweedse archieven, een onderzoek naar archivalia inzake de betrekkingen tussen Nederland en Zweden 1520-1920, The Hague 1986, p. 214. H. Droste, Im Dienst der Krone: Schwedische Diplomaten im 17. Jahrhundert, Münster 2006, p. 391 (B 39).
- 9F. Haskell and N. Penny, Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500-1900, New Haven/London 1981, no. 30.
- 10F. Scholten, ‘The Larson Family of Statuary Founders: Seventeenth-Century Reproductive Sculpture for Gardens and Painters’ Studios’, Simiolus 31 (2004-05), pp. 54-89, esp. p. 58.
- 11C. Avery, ‘Hubert le Sueur, the “Unworthy Praxiteles” of Charles I’, in C. Avery, Studies in European Sculpture vol. 2, London 1988, pp. 145-235, esp. 173-76, 209, no. 18, fig. 50c.