Getting started with the collection:
Gerard van Opstal
Bacchanal with a Satyr Family and Putti
Antwerp, c. 1635 - c. 1642
Technical notes
Carved in high relief, partly openworked and polished.
Condition
The upper section of the bunch of grapes is missing. Several repaired breaks can be discerned.
Provenance
…; collection Jan Snellen (1711-1787), Rotterdam;1R.J.A. te Rijdt, ‘Een ‘nieuw’ portret van een ‘nieuwe’ verzamelaar van kunst en naturaliën: Jan Snellen geportretteerd door Aert Schouman in 1746’, Oud Holland 111 (1997), pp. 22-53, esp. p. 35 and note 64. by descent to his great-grandson Samuel Constant Snellen van Vollenhoven (1816-1880), The Hague; from whom acquired by the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague, 1876; transferred to the museum, 1885
ObjectNumber: BK-NM-2934
Entry
The Flemish sculptor Gerard van Opstal (c. 1597-1668) garnered tremendous praise as an artist with his exquisite ivory carvings. In Paris, his miniature sculptures in this medium were acquired and collected by members of the highest circles. The Cabinet du Roi boasted no less than seventeen ivory works made by the sculptor, including mythological reliefs, crucifixes and goblets.2P. Malgouyres, ‘La collection d’ivoires de Louis XIV: L’acquisition du fonds d’atelier de Gérard van Opstal (vers 1604-1668)’, La Revue de Louvre et des musées de France 2007-5, pp. 46-54. Characteristic of Van Opstal’s style is the openwork relief, liberating the figures from the background. As described in the inventories of contemporaneous collectors, these reliefs were originally mounted on a black-velvet ground (à fondz de velours noir) and displayed as such on tables and in cabinets (pour mettre sur tables et cabinets).3D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 448.
Van Opstal began his career as an apprentice to Nicolaes Diedon, a little known Brussels sculptor. There are indications that he subsequently spent quite some time in the artistic milieu of the Brussels sculptor François du Quesnoy (1597-1643) in Rome before appearing in Paris in 1631.4F. Scholten, ‘Gerard van Opstal’s “Grand Manner”’, Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 46 (2025). There, he worked for several years as an assistant to the French sculptor Jacques Sarazin (1592–1660) at Château de Chilly, southwest of the city. In Antwerp, where he settled and registered as a master in the Guild of St Luke in 1635/36, he worked for some time in collaboration with Johannes van Mildert (1588-1638), whose daughter he married in 1637. In 1642, he departed for Paris, presumably at the invitation of Cardinal De Richelieu.5D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 449. There Van Opstal would eventually become involved in the founding of the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture (1648). In his capacity as Sculpteur des Bâtiments du Roi, a position to which he was appointed in 1651, Van Opstal produced (decorative) marble and stone architectural sculptures adorning monumental buildings such as the Palais du Louvre and the (ultimately demolished) Porte Saint-Antoine.
Van Opstal’s favourite theme in ivory were mythological scenes featuring frolicking satyrs and plump putti. Representations of this kind were first popularized by artists working in Rome during the 1630s, most notably by the aforementioned sculptor François du Quesnoy. Van Opstal’s rotund toddlers are in fact highly reminiscent of Du Quesnoy’s putti. In the dynamic compositions and supple corporeality, however, one also discerns the influence of paintings by Rubens.6D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 454. Van Opstal was one of several Flemish artists responsible for introducing the style of Du Quesnoy and Rubens in France. Du Quesnoy himself had also been invited by Cardinal de Richelieu to come work for the French crown, were it not that he perished during his journey to Paris, meeting his untimely death in Livorno on 12 July 1643.7M. Boudon-Machuel, François du Quesnoy 1597-1643, Paris 2005, pp. 172-74.
At far right, a satyr lies semi-recumbent on a goatskin playing a pan flute. His female counterpart suckles her new-born while handing a second satyr-child a bunch of grapes. The family is accompanied on the left by four dancing putti, one of which plays the tambourine. Van Opstal likely carved this relief during his Antwerp period. Those he later produced in Paris are generally somewhat more ambitious in their composition, detailing and the differentiation of textures.8Cf. P. Malgouyres, Ivoires de la Renaissance et des temps moderne: La collection du musée du Louvre, coll. cat. Paris 2010, nos. 68-73. In 1984, a (late-?) seventeenth-century copy of the present relief surfaced on the art market, carved in a different material, possibly wood, then tentatively attributed to the Brussels architect-sculptor Jan Cosijn (1646-1708) (fig. a).9In 1984 with the dealer Fröhlich, St. Gallen, present whereabouts unknown.
The Rijksmuseum purchased the ivory in 1876 from Samuel Constant Snellen van Vollenhoven, whose art collection was largely acquired through an inheritance from his great-grandfather, Jan Snellen. That the present piece was originally in Snellen’s possession is confirmed by the fact that his portraitist, friend and fellow resident of Amsterdam, Aert Schouman, made a chalk drawing of the relief in 1738.10See RKD, image no. 78232. On the sheet’s reverse, the following annotation was made: ‘after a Bas-relief by François Quesnoij of Amsterdam [sic!] in ivory. By A. Schouman 1738.’11naar een Basrelief van François Quesnoij van Amsterdam (sic!) in’t ijvoor. Door A. Schouman 1738. On the front of the first drawing, which according to the annotation on the reverse dates from 1738, the year ‘1740’ has been written. Perhaps Schouman himself added this year when working on the second drawing. Presumably, the same artist also made a second, larger drawing of the relief in 1740.12R.J.A. te Rijdt, ‘Een “nieuw” portret van een “nieuwe” verzamelaar van kunst en naturaliën: Jan Snellen geportretteerd door Aert Schouman in 1746’, Oud Holland 111 (1997), pp. 22-53, esp. note 64. While its present whereabouts are unknown, this second drawing was in the collection of another friend of Snellen’s, Arnout Vosmaer, described in his sale catalogue as follows: ‘An exquisitely beautiful drawing in colour by A. Schouman made after an ivory bas-relief by the famous Quinoy [François du Quesnoy] now preserved by Mr Vollenhoven of Rotterdam.13This Vollenhoven was Samuel Constant van Snellen’s grandfather and Jan Snellen’s son. The [relief] depicts a landscape, in which a pan flute-playing Satyr and [a] Satyress with a suckling at the breast lie beneath a tent-cloth; in front of her four small children dance next to a child-satyr and other elements. This piece is from [Schouman’s] very best period. H. 9 B. 12 D’.14Een uitmuntende fraaye teekening in kleuren door A. Schouman gemaakt naar eene ivoor bas relief van den beroemden Quinoy tans berustende by den Hr. Vollenhoven te Rotterdam. Hetzelve verbeeld een landschap, waarin onder een tentkleed een op de riet pyp speelende leggende Satyr en Stayrin met een zuigling aan de borst; voor haar dansen vier kindertjes nevens een satyrje en verder bywerk. Dit stuk is van zyn (Schoumans) allerbeste tyd. H. 9 B. 12 D; sale collection Arnout Vosmaer, The Hague (B. Scheurleer), 17 March 1800, vol. 2, p. 271, no. 60. Schouman evidently embellished his rendering of Van Opstal’s relief – in 1800 seen as a work by Du Quesnoy – with the addition of a tent.
Bieke van der Mark, 2025
Literature
J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, no. 262, with earlier literature; R.J.A. te Rijdt, ‘Een “nieuw” portret van een “nieuwe” verzamelaar van kunst en naturaliën: Jan Snellen geportretteerd door Aert Schouman in 1746’, Oud Holland 111 (1997), pp. 22-53, esp. pp. 35-36 and note 64; sale Amsterdam (Sotheby’s), 8 November 2000, p. 82; D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 454
Citation
B. van der Mark, 2025, 'Gerard van Opstal, Bacchanal with a Satyr Family and Putti, Antwerp, c. 1635 - c. 1642', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.24560
(accessed 25 April 2025 17:10:55).Figures
Footnotes
- 1R.J.A. te Rijdt, ‘Een ‘nieuw’ portret van een ‘nieuwe’ verzamelaar van kunst en naturaliën: Jan Snellen geportretteerd door Aert Schouman in 1746’, Oud Holland 111 (1997), pp. 22-53, esp. p. 35 and note 64.
- 2P. Malgouyres, ‘La collection d’ivoires de Louis XIV: L’acquisition du fonds d’atelier de Gérard van Opstal (vers 1604-1668)’, La Revue de Louvre et des musées de France 2007-5, pp. 46-54.
- 3D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 448.
- 4F. Scholten, ‘Gerard van Opstal’s “Grand Manner”’, Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 46 (2025).
- 5D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 449.
- 6D. Alcouffe et al., Un temps d’exubérance: Les arts décoratifs sous Louis XIII et Anne d’Autriche, exh. cat. Paris (Grand Palais) 2002, p. 454.
- 7M. Boudon-Machuel, François du Quesnoy 1597-1643, Paris 2005, pp. 172-74.
- 8Cf. P. Malgouyres, Ivoires de la Renaissance et des temps moderne: La collection du musée du Louvre, coll. cat. Paris 2010, nos. 68-73.
- 9In 1984 with the dealer Fröhlich, St. Gallen, present whereabouts unknown.
- 10See RKD, image no. 78232.
- 11naar een Basrelief van François Quesnoij van Amsterdam (sic!) in’t ijvoor. Door A. Schouman 1738. On the front of the first drawing, which according to the annotation on the reverse dates from 1738, the year ‘1740’ has been written. Perhaps Schouman himself added this year when working on the second drawing.
- 12R.J.A. te Rijdt, ‘Een “nieuw” portret van een “nieuwe” verzamelaar van kunst en naturaliën: Jan Snellen geportretteerd door Aert Schouman in 1746’, Oud Holland 111 (1997), pp. 22-53, esp. note 64.
- 13This Vollenhoven was Samuel Constant van Snellen’s grandfather and Jan Snellen’s son.
- 14Een uitmuntende fraaye teekening in kleuren door A. Schouman gemaakt naar eene ivoor bas relief van den beroemden Quinoy tans berustende by den Hr. Vollenhoven te Rotterdam. Hetzelve verbeeld een landschap, waarin onder een tentkleed een op de riet pyp speelende leggende Satyr en Stayrin met een zuigling aan de borst; voor haar dansen vier kindertjes nevens een satyrje en verder bywerk. Dit stuk is van zyn (Schoumans) allerbeste tyd. H. 9 B. 12 D; sale collection Arnout Vosmaer, The Hague (B. Scheurleer), 17 March 1800, vol. 2, p. 271, no. 60.