De bewening van Christus

Pieter de Grebber, 1640

De bewening van Christus door de heilige vrouwen.

  • Soort kunstwerkschilderij
  • ObjectnummerSK-C-522
  • Afmetingendrager: hoogte 164 cm x breedte 174 cm, buitenmaat: diepte 8,5 cm (drager incl. SK-L-3630), geheel: gewicht (eigenschap) 36,6 kg (drager incl. SK-L-3630)
  • Fysieke kenmerkenolieverf op doek

Identificatie

  • Titel(s)

    De bewening van Christus

  • Objecttype

  • Objectnummer

    SK-C-522

  • Beschrijving

    De bewening van Christus door de heilige vrouwen.

  • Opschriften / Merken

    signatuur en datum, linksonder: ‘

     P. DG / 1640

  • Onderdeel van catalogus


Vervaardiging

  • Vervaardiging

    schilder: Pieter de Grebber

  • Datering

    1640

  • Zoek verder op


Materiaal en techniek

  • Fysieke kenmerken

    olieverf op doek

  • Afmetingen

    • drager: hoogte 164 cm x breedte 174 cm
    • buitenmaat: diepte 8,5 cm (drager incl. SK-L-3630)
    • geheel: gewicht (eigenschap) 36,6 kg (drager incl. SK-L-3630)

Dit werk gaat over

  • Onderwerp


Verwerving en rechten

  • Credit line

    Bruikleen van het Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap

  • Copyright

  • Herkomst

    …; on loan from Adrianus Daniel de Vries Azn (1851-1884) to the KOG, 1879-84;{_Jaarverslag Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap_ 1879, p. 26.} donated by his family to the KOG, 1884;{_Jaarverslag Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap_ 1884, p. 20.} on loan from the KOG to the museum since 1889; on loan to Museum Amstelkring, Amsterdam, March 1980-August 1981


Documentatie


Gerelateerde objecten

  • Gerelateerd


Duurzaam webadres


Pieter de Grebber

The Lamentation

1640

Inscriptions

  • signature and date, lower left (D and G ligated):  P. DG / 1640

Technical notes

Support The plain-weave canvas has been wax-resin lined. The tacking edges have been preserved at the top and bottom, though trimmed, the ones on the left and right have been removed. The initial sight size of the painting must have been larger, since the picture plane is folded over the current stretcher on the left and right.
Preparatory layers The single, beige ground extends up to the tacking edges at the top and bottom and up to the current edges of the canvas on the left and right.
Underdrawing No underdrawing could be detected with the naked eye or infrared photography.
Paint layers The paint extends up to the tacking edges at the top and bottom and up to the current edges of the canvas on the left and right. An undermodelling in brownish tones is visible at some contours. The composition was built up from the back to the front, with reserves for the figures. The clothing was painted wet in wet, blending the light and shaded areas together. A stiff dry brush was used in the Virgin’s veil, leaving a distinct, striped pattern. The flesh tones, also applied wet in wet, were finished with warm glazes and cool scumbles. The shadows on Christ’s body were indicated with deep red glazes, for instance in the navel, giving depth and translucency to the skin. There is impasto in the flesh tones, the background and the clothing.
Michel van de Laar, 2008


Scientific examination and reports

  • technical report: M. van de Laar, RMA, 24 april 2008
  • paint samples: M. van de Laar, RMA, nos. SK-C-522/1-2, 22 mei 2008

Condition

Fair. There are several areas with large, repaired tears, some of which are out of plane. These are covered by generous, discoloured retouchings. The darkest area of the background has turned greyish and has been partially overpainted. Parts of the undermodelling originally left visible have been covered with overpaint.


Conservation

  • conservator unknown, 1894: canvas lined; varnish repaired; lower left corner restored
  • H.H. Mertens, 1961: canvas relined; transferred to a new stretcher

Provenance

…; on loan from Adrianus Daniel de Vries Azn (1851-1884) to the KOG, 1879-84;1Jaarverslag Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap 1879, p. 26. donated by his family to the KOG, 1884;2Jaarverslag Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap 1884, p. 20. on loan from the KOG to the museum since 1889; on loan to Museum Amstelkring, Amsterdam, March 1980-August 1981

Object number: SK-C-522

Credit line: On loan from the Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap


The artist

Biography

Pieter de Grebber (Haarlem c. 1600 - Haarlem 1652/53)

Pieter de Grebber was born into a Catholic family of artists, probably around 1600. He was the eldest son of the Haarlem portrait and history painter Frans Pietersz de Grebber. His sister Maria and brother Albert were also painters, and his brother Maurits was a goldsmith. He trained with his father and with Hendrick Goltzius. In 1618 Frans and Pieter de Grebber went to Antwerp to visit Peter Paul Rubens, for whom the former acted as an agent. Schrevelius says that Pieter worked in Denmark, which may have been in the mid-1620s, since his Belshazzar’s Feast dated 1625 came from Gottorf Castle in Schleswig, which was Danish at the time.3Kassel, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in A. Blankert et al., Dutch Classicism in Seventeenth-Century Painting, exh. cat. Rotterdam (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen)/Frankfurt (Städelsches Kunstinstitut und Städtische Galerie) 1999-2000, p. 21. Around 1628, he was probably back in Haarlem, where he joined his father’s workshop. He enrolled in the local Guild of St Luke in 1632, and two years later bought a house in the Begijnhof. He was elected dean of the guild in 1642. He was a very successful artist, whose talent was spotted early on by authors such as Ampzing, Angel and Schrevelius.

De Grebber mainly painted history pieces with religious subjects, and portraits, often of clergymen, but a few of his genre scenes have also survived. He also made several etchings and print designs. The earliest dated paintings that are securely attributed to him are The Virgin Reading and the Child4Haarlem, Frans Hals Museum; illustrated in P. Biesboer et al., Painting in Haarlem 1500-1850: The Collection of the Frans Hals Museum, coll. cat. Haarlem 2006, p. 466. and Caritas,5Houston, The Museum of Fine Arts. both of 1622. He received a remarkably large number of commissions for history pieces, from local patrons such as the city authorities, the Old Men’s Home and the Leper House, and also from outside Haarlem. He executed works for various palaces of Stadholder Frederik Hendrik and was one of the artists who made paintings for the Oranjezaal (Orange Hall) of Huis ten Bosch, Amalia van Solms’s newly built residence in The Hague. A substantial part of his oeuvre consists of altarpieces and other paintings for the Haarlem chapter-house and various clandestine churches as far afield as Rotterdam, Bruges and Ghent. Alongside Salomon de Bray, his son Jan de Bray and Caesar van Everdingen, De Grebber was a pioneer of Haarlem classicism. In 1649 he published a broad sheet setting out his views on the painting of history scenes.6Regulen: Welcke by een goet Schilder en Teyckenaer geobserveert en achtervolght moeten werden: Tesamen ghestelt tot lust van de leergierighe Discipelen (Rules to be observed and followed by a good painter and draughtsman, compiled for the pleasure of disciples with a thirst for learning). He collaborated at least once with Adriaen Muyltjes, who had also worked in Denmark. He never married, and died in Haarlem between 24 September 1652 and 29 January 1653. He had a Danish pupil, Dyvert Rave (dates unknown), and it emerges from a claim submitted by De Grebber’s heirs that Dirck Helmbreeker (1633-1696) was also apprenticed to him. Van Hoogstraten says that Peter Lely (1618-1680) studied with him, and Houbraken added the names of Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683) and Hendrik Graauw (c. 1627-1693).

Gerdien Wuestman, 2026

References
S. Ampzing, Het lof der stadt Haerlem in Hollandt, Haarlem 1621 (unpag.); S. Ampzing, Beschryvinge ende lof der stad Haerlem in Holland, Haarlem 1628 (reprint Amsterdam 1974), p. 370; P. Angel, Lof der Schilderkonst, Leiden 1642 – trans. M. Hoyle and annot. H. Miedema, ‘Philips Angel, Praise of Painting’, Simiolus 24 (1996), pp. 227-58, esp. p. 248; T. Schrevelius, Harlemias, Haarlem 1648, p. 382; S. van Hoogstraten, Inleyding tot de hooge schoole der schilderkonst: Anders de zichtbaere werelt: Verdeelt in negen leerwinkels, Rotterdam 1678, p. 257; A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, II, Amsterdam 1719, pp. 42, 111, 122, 189; Wichmann in U. Thieme and F. Becker (eds.), Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, XIV, Leipzig 1921, p. 560; P.J.J. van Thiel, ‘De Grebbers regels van de kunst’, Oud Holland 80 (1965), pp. 126-31; P. Dirkse, ‘Pieter de Grebber: Haarlems schilder tussen begijnen, kloppen en pastoors’, Haarlem Jaarboek 1978, pp. 109-27; H. Miedema, De archiefbescheiden van het St. Lucasgilde te Haarlem, 1497-1798, II, Alphen aan den Rijn 1980, pp. 421, 934, 1039; Van Thiel-Stroman in J.A. Welu and P. Biesboer (eds.), Judith Leyster: A Dutch Master and her World, exh. cat. Haarlem (Frans Halsmuseum)/Worcester (Worcester Art Museum) 1993, pp. 220-21; Sutton in J. Turner (ed.), The Dictionary of Art, XIII, New York 1996, p. 337; X. van Eck, ‘The Artist’s Religion: Paintings Commissioned for Clandestine Catholic Churches in the Northern Netherlands, 1600-1800’, Simiolus 27 (1999), pp. 70-94, esp. pp. 73-74; Sutton in A. Blankert et al., Dutch Classicism in Seventeenth-Century Painting, exh. cat. Rotterdam (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen)/Frankfurt (Städelsches Kunstinstitut und Städtische Galerie) 1999-2000, pp. 116, 118; X. van Eck, ‘Een kwijnend bisdom nieuw leven ingeblazen: Pieter de Grebber en het Haarlems kapittel’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 52 (2004), pp. 254-69; I. van Thiel-Stroman, ‘Biographies 15th-17th Century’, in P. Biesboer et al., Painting in Haarlem 1500-1850: The Collection of the Frans Hals Museum, coll. cat. Haarlem 2006, pp. 99-363, esp. pp. 168-72; Wegener in Saur Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon: Die Bildenden Künstler aller Zeiten und Völker, LXI, Munich/Leipzig 2009, p. 139


Entry

This Lamentation of 1640 has several points of similarity to Pieter de Grebber’s Descent from the Cross of seven years earlier.7SK-A-2311. Christ’s dead body is once again placed diagonally in the picture plane, and the figures of Christ and the Virgin also form a triangle. Like the altarpiece of 1633, this painting is reminiscent of Flemish works,8R. Kultzen, Michael Sweerts: Brussels 1618 - Goa 1664, Doornspijk 1996, p. 54. See, for instance, Anthony van Dyck’s altarpiece in Antwerp, Royal Museum of Fine Arts; illustrated in E. Vandamme (ed.), Catalogus schilderkunst: Oude meesters, coll. cat. Antwerp (Royal Museum of Fine Arts) 1988, p. 116. although the display of emotion is less intense and the composition more tranquil. Rembrandt’s influence on De Grebber’s output is no longer discernible in this period. The balanced composition and the self-restrained poses of the figures make this a distinctly classicist work. The artist paid great attention to the anatomy, a skill for which he received considerable praise from Philips Angel in 1642,9P. Angel, Lof der Schilderkonst, Leiden 1642 – trans. M. Hoyle and annot. H. Miedema, ‘Philips Angel, Praise of Painting’, Simiolus 24 (1996), pp. 227-58, esp. p. 248. but the result is not entirely successful, since Christ’s body is far too long in relation to his head.

De Grebber did not set the scene at the foot of the Cross but in a cave, where Christ is to be buried. He is surrounded by the three Marys. Two unusual features are the Virgin’s black veil and the red cloth on which Christ’s body rests. The white shroud on which he was traditionally depicted is being held by one of the figures in the right background, identifying him as Joseph of Arimathea, who had bought fine linen in which to wrap Christ’s body. One of the other figures outside the cave is Nicodemus, who is recognizable from the jar containing myrrh and aloes that he brought for the burial after the descent from the Cross (Mark 15:46; John 19:39). The third man in this group could be St John. The abrupt truncation of the scene on the right suggests that the painting was cut down on this side, and technical examination gives reason to believe that this rather square canvas was originally wider.10See Technical notes. The composition is related to a slightly earlier Entombment by De Grebber, in which there is also a second group of figures in the background.11Panel, 97 x 139.5 cm; sale, Amsterdam (Sotheby's), 22 May 1989, no. 50 (ill.).

It is not known who commissioned the Rijksmuseum canvas, but the subject and the dimensions suggest that it came from a church. Van Eck argued that the original horizontal format made it more suitable for a wall in a private chapel or a clandestine church than as an altarpiece.12X. van Eck, ‘Een kwijnend bisdom nieuw leven ingeblazen: Pieter de Grebber en het Haarlems kapittel’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 52 (2004), pp. 254-69, esp. p. 260. One possibility, given the fact that Christ is being mourned only by the three Marys, is that it was painted as a devotional work for a small community of Catholic women, such as the Begijnhof, where De Grebber himself lived.13With thanks to Pieter van Thiel for this suggestion. See P. Dirkse, Begijnen, pastoors en predikanten: Religie en kunst in de Gouden Eeuw, Leiden 2001, pp. 147-50, for another painting that may have been made for the clandestine church of the Haarlem beguinage.

Gerdien Wuestman, 2026

See Key to abbreviations, Rijksmuseum painting catalogues and Acknowledgements


Literature

X. van Eck, ‘Een kwijnend bisdom nieuw leven ingeblazen: Pieter de Grebber en het Haarlems kapittel’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 52 (2004), pp. 254-69, esp. p. 260


Collection catalogues

1903, p. 108, no. 1001; 1934, p. 111, no. 1001; 1960, p. 116, no. 1001; 1976, p. 248, no. C 522


Citation

Gerdien Wuestman, 2026, 'Pieter de Grebber, The Lamentation, 1640', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20027969

(accessed 31 January 2026 20:20:02).

Footnotes

  • 1Jaarverslag Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap 1879, p. 26.
  • 2Jaarverslag Koninklijk Oudheidkundig Genootschap 1884, p. 20.
  • 3Kassel, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in A. Blankert et al., Dutch Classicism in Seventeenth-Century Painting, exh. cat. Rotterdam (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen)/Frankfurt (Städelsches Kunstinstitut und Städtische Galerie) 1999-2000, p. 21.
  • 4Haarlem, Frans Hals Museum; illustrated in P. Biesboer et al., Painting in Haarlem 1500-1850: The Collection of the Frans Hals Museum, coll. cat. Haarlem 2006, p. 466.
  • 5Houston, The Museum of Fine Arts.
  • 6Regulen: Welcke by een goet Schilder en Teyckenaer geobserveert en achtervolght moeten werden: Tesamen ghestelt tot lust van de leergierighe Discipelen (Rules to be observed and followed by a good painter and draughtsman, compiled for the pleasure of disciples with a thirst for learning).
  • 7SK-A-2311.
  • 8R. Kultzen, Michael Sweerts: Brussels 1618 - Goa 1664, Doornspijk 1996, p. 54. See, for instance, Anthony van Dyck’s altarpiece in Antwerp, Royal Museum of Fine Arts; illustrated in E. Vandamme (ed.), Catalogus schilderkunst: Oude meesters, coll. cat. Antwerp (Royal Museum of Fine Arts) 1988, p. 116.
  • 9P. Angel, Lof der Schilderkonst, Leiden 1642 – trans. M. Hoyle and annot. H. Miedema, ‘Philips Angel, Praise of Painting’, Simiolus 24 (1996), pp. 227-58, esp. p. 248.
  • 10See Technical notes.
  • 11Panel, 97 x 139.5 cm; sale, Amsterdam (Sotheby's), 22 May 1989, no. 50 (ill.).
  • 12X. van Eck, ‘Een kwijnend bisdom nieuw leven ingeblazen: Pieter de Grebber en het Haarlems kapittel’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 52 (2004), pp. 254-69, esp. p. 260.
  • 13With thanks to Pieter van Thiel for this suggestion. See P. Dirkse, Begijnen, pastoors en predikanten: Religie en kunst in de Gouden Eeuw, Leiden 2001, pp. 147-50, for another painting that may have been made for the clandestine church of the Haarlem beguinage.