Aan de slag met de collectie:
Mercurius en Io
W. Ossenbeck, 1632
Mercurius en Io. De door Juno in een koe veranderde Io wordt door Mercurius bij haar vader Inachus teruggebracht. Links een kudde koeien, rechts twee paarden. Bij de voeten van Inachus zit een hondje.
- Soort kunstwerkschilderij
- ObjectnummerSK-A-297
- Afmetingendrager: hoogte 37,5 cm x breedte 55,5 cm, buitenmaat: diepte 9,2 cm (drager incl. SK-L-3798)
- Fysieke kenmerkenolieverf op paneel
Identificatie
Titel(s)
Mercurius en Io
Objecttype
Objectnummer
SK-A-297
Beschrijving
Mercurius en Io. De door Juno in een koe veranderde Io wordt door Mercurius bij haar vader Inachus teruggebracht. Links een kudde koeien, rechts twee paarden. Bij de voeten van Inachus zit een hondje.
Opschriften / Merken
signatuur en datum, linksonder: ‘
W. OSSENBECK F 1632
’Onderdeel van catalogus
Vervaardiging
Vervaardiging
schilder: W. Ossenbeck
Datering
1632
Zoek verder op
Materiaal en techniek
Fysieke kenmerken
olieverf op paneel
Afmetingen
- drager: hoogte 37,5 cm x breedte 55,5 cm
- buitenmaat: diepte 9,2 cm (drager incl. SK-L-3798)
Dit werk gaat over
Onderwerp
Verwerving en rechten
Credit line
Legaat van L. Dupper Wzn., Dordrecht
Verwerving
legaat 1870
Copyright
Herkomst
…; collection Leendert Dupper Willemsz (1799-1870), Dordrecht;{C. von Lützow, ‘Die vormals Dupper’sche Sammlung’, _Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst_ 5 (1870), pp. 227-30, esp. p. 228.} by whom bequeathed to the museum, with 63 other paintings, 12 April 1870{NHA, ARM, IS, inv. 30, nos. 123 (8 March 1870), 132 (25 April 1870, no. 245); NHA, ARM, Kop., inv. 39, pp. 62-63 (11 May 1870).}
Duurzaam webadres
Als u naar dit object wilt verwijzen, gebruik dan de duurzame URL:
Vragen?
Ziet u een fout? Of heeft u extra informatie over dit object? Laat het ons weten!
W. Ossenbeck
Mercury and Battus (Ovid, Metamorphoses, bk. II, 680-707)
1632
Inscriptions
- signature and date, bottom left: W. OSSENBECK F 1632
Technical notes
Support The single, horizontally grained, quarter-sawn oak plank is approx. 1.3 cm thick at the top and approx. 0.7 cm at the bottom. The top edge was trimmed slightly, possibly to remove insect damage, traces of which are still present. The reverse is bevelled at the top and on the upper left and right, and has regularly spaced saw marks and remnants of a wax seal. Dendrochronology has shown that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1626 and that the top edge includes 6 sapwood rings. The panel could have been ready for use by 1637, but a date in or after 1643 is more likely.
Preparatory layers The double ground extends over the edges of the support at the bottom and on the left and right, but not over the top edge. The first, dark grey layer consists of white and fine black pigment particles and is followed by an orange layer.
Underdrawing No underdrawing could be detected with the naked eye or infrared reflectography.
Paint layers The paint extends almost up to the edges of the support at the bottom and on the left and right, and up to the top edge. Infrared reflectography revealed wide brush marks, probably part of an initial lay-in, roughly indicating the composition. Some dark undermodelling is visible to the naked eye in the two men. The figures, cows and horses were brought on rapidly, simultaneously with the background, with many wet-in-wet transitions. The foreground was applied up to and around the compositional elements, followed by the sky, which was executed around the larger trees. The smaller trees and other details and highlights were introduced last. The paint layer is smooth and has little impasto.
Laurent Sozanni, 2009 / additions by Lisette Vos, 2023
Scientific examination and reports
- paint samples: L. Sozzani, RMA, nos. SK-A-297/1-2, 9 april 2009
- infrared photography: L. Sozzani, RMA, 10 april 2009
- technical report: L. Sozzani, RMA, 14 april 2009
- dendrochronology: P. Klein, RMA, 28 oktober 2009
Condition
Poor. Pronounced drying cracks are visible in the face and hands of Mercurius. The reddish-brown paint of the figures, cows and horses has faded. The paint surface appears abraded throughout and is covered by old retouchings and a discoloured varnish.
Conservation
- H. Plagge, 1964: treated
Provenance
…; collection Leendert Dupper Willemsz (1799-1870), Dordrecht;1C. von Lützow, ‘Die vormals Dupper’sche Sammlung’, Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst 5 (1870), pp. 227-30, esp. p. 228. by whom bequeathed to the museum, with 63 other paintings, 12 April 18702NHA, ARM, IS, inv. 30, nos. 123 (8 March 1870), 132 (25 April 1870, no. 245); NHA, ARM, Kop., inv. 39, pp. 62-63 (11 May 1870).
Object number: SK-A-297
Credit line: Dupper Wzn. Bequest, Dordrecht
The artist
Biography
W. Ossenbeck (active 1632)
The only evidence that testifies to the life of W. Ossenbeck is his signature on the Mercury and Battus in the Rijksmuseum, which also shows that he was active in 1632 in a style that bears some relation to that of the Pre-Rembrandtists. This is the only secure work by the artist. The traditional identification with the ‘Ossenbek’ mentioned by Houbraken cannot be sustained. The artist biographer was referring to Jan Dircksz Ossenbeeck (? Rotterdam c. 1624 - Vienna 1674), whose paintings happen to be closely related to Mercury and Battus.
Erlend de Groot, 2026
References
U. Thieme and F. Becker (eds.), Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, XXVI, Leipzig 1932, p. 72; Van der Zeeuw in N.I. Schadee (ed.), Rotterdamse meesters uit de Gouden Eeuw, exh. cat. Rotterdam (Historisch Museum) 1994, p. 291
Entry
When the old herdsman Battus witnessed Mercury stealing Apollo’s oxen, the god gave him a heifer to remain silent. Mercury later came back in disguise and offered Battus a reward if he would reveal the location of the stolen cattle. The latter complied, so Mercury turned him into a rock to punish him for his greed.3Ovid, Metamorphoses, bk. II, 680-707. Scenes of this episode from Ovid’s Metamorphoses are quite rare in Dutch painting, and most of those that have survived date from the 1630s,4E.J. Sluijter, De ‘heydensche fabulen’ in de schilderkunst van de Gouden Eeuw: Schilderijen met verhalende onderwerpen uit de klassieke mythologie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden, circa 1590-1670, Leiden 2000, pp. 45, 226-27, notes 86-88. and are from the circle around Jacob Pynas and Claes Moeyaert.5Jacob Pynas, Mercury and Battus, Kassel, Gemãldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in E.J. Sluijter, De ‘heydensche fabulen’ in de schilderkunst van de Gouden Eeuw: Schilderijen met verhalende onderwerpen uit de klassieke mythologie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden, circa 1590-1670, Leiden 2000, p. 412, no. 128; copy after Claes Moeyaert, Mercury and Battus, present whereabouts unknown; illustrated in ibid., p. 412, no. 129. It is not known where the otherwise obscure ‘W. Ossenbeck’ (as he signed this panel) worked, but he was clearly inspired by those models. He not only placed the scene in a southern, Italianate landscape, as his Amsterdam colleagues did, but he also left no room for Apollo, who had figured in earlier depictions.6One example from the late sixteenth century is a print by Peeter van der Borcht from a series of illustrations of Ovid’s Metamorphoses; see H. Mielke and U. Mielke, The New Hollstein Dutch & Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts 1450-1700: Peeter van der Borcht: Book Illustrations, IV, ed. G. Luijten, Ouderkerk aan den IJssel 2006, pp. 140, 176, no. 1688.
Erlend de Groot, 2026
See Key to abbreviations, Rijksmuseum painting catalogues and Acknowledgements
Collection catalogues
1876, p. 144, no. 287 (as Mercury and Io); 1880, pp. 236-37, no. 259 (as Mercury and Io); 1887, p. 38, no. 259 (as Mercury and Io); 1903, p. 201, no. 1811 (as Willem Ossenbeeck, Mercury and Io); 1976, p. 429, no. A 297 (as Willem Ossenbeeck, Mercury and Io)
Citation
Erlend de Groot, 2026, 'W. Ossenbeck, _, 1632', in J. Bikker (ed.), _Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20025951
(accessed 22 March 2026 07:20:52).Footnotes
- 1C. von Lützow, ‘Die vormals Dupper’sche Sammlung’, Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst 5 (1870), pp. 227-30, esp. p. 228.
- 2NHA, ARM, IS, inv. 30, nos. 123 (8 March 1870), 132 (25 April 1870, no. 245); NHA, ARM, Kop., inv. 39, pp. 62-63 (11 May 1870).
- 3Ovid, Metamorphoses, bk. II, 680-707.
- 4E.J. Sluijter, De ‘heydensche fabulen’ in de schilderkunst van de Gouden Eeuw: Schilderijen met verhalende onderwerpen uit de klassieke mythologie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden, circa 1590-1670, Leiden 2000, pp. 45, 226-27, notes 86-88.
- 5Jacob Pynas, Mercury and Battus, Kassel, Gemãldegalerie Alte Meister; illustrated in E.J. Sluijter, De ‘heydensche fabulen’ in de schilderkunst van de Gouden Eeuw: Schilderijen met verhalende onderwerpen uit de klassieke mythologie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden, circa 1590-1670, Leiden 2000, p. 412, no. 128; copy after Claes Moeyaert, Mercury and Battus, present whereabouts unknown; illustrated in ibid., p. 412, no. 129.
- 6One example from the late sixteenth century is a print by Peeter van der Borcht from a series of illustrations of Ovid’s Metamorphoses; see H. Mielke and U. Mielke, The New Hollstein Dutch & Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts 1450-1700: Peeter van der Borcht: Book Illustrations, IV, ed. G. Luijten, Ouderkerk aan den IJssel 2006, pp. 140, 176, no. 1688.