Aan de slag met de collectie:
Adam van Breen
The Vijverberg, The Hague, in Winter, with Prince Maurits and his Retinue in the Foreground
1618
Inscriptions
- signature and date, at bottom right:A. v. Breen 1618
Technical notes
The support consists of three horizontally grained oak planks and is bevelled on the right and left sides. Dendrochronology has shown that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1609. The panel could have been ready for use by 1620, but a date in or after 1626 is more likely. There is an off-white ground with an overall underpainting in grey and brown. The city view and the landscape were painted first; the outlines of the buildings seem to be incised. The figures were painted on top of the ice and elsewhere, without reserves and without much detail.
Scientific examination and reports
- technical report: G. Tauber, RMA, 16 januari 2005
Condition
Fair. The paint layer is heavily abraded, with a great deal of overpainting in the sky and the ice. The thick varnish is discoloured.
Conservation
- conservator unknown, 1905: treatment unknown
- W. Hesterman, 1972: panel join glued
- L. Sozzani, 1999: varnish reduced; retouched and revarnished
Provenance
...; an 18th-century Dutch collection;1Two labels with old handwriting on the reverse of the panel....; ? sale, J. Visser (†), The Hague (B. Scheurleer), 16 (20) December 1811 sqq., no. 66 (‘Gezigt van ’t binnenhof, vyver en vyverberg, zynde een ysvermaak, 1618’);...; from Mr Ruppertshoven van Boll, Vienna, fl. 700, to the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague (inv. no. 4385), 1878; transferred to the museum, 1885
ObjectNumber: SK-A-955
The artist
Biography
Adam van Breen (? Amsterdam c. 1585 - ? Kristiania in or after 1642)
Adam van Breen was probably born in Amsterdam around 1585. Nothing is known about his training with certainty, but it is thought that he was a pupil of Hendrick Avercamp (1585-1634) or David Vinckboons (1576-1630/33), or both. On 13 February 1612 he gave notice of his intended marriage to the widow Maria Gelle in The Hague, on which occasion he was registered as ‘bachelor from Amsterdam’. He joined the Guild of St Luke in The Hague in 1612 or 1614. On 28 June 1617 he received 100 pounds from the States-General for his designs for the 62 engravings in Die Nassausche Wapenhandelinge, which he published in The Hague in 1618 as a supplement to Jacques de Gheyn’s Wapenhandelinghe of 1608. He must have left The Hague in 1621 and moved to Amsterdam, where he was declared bankrupt in March 1622. From 1624 he was active in Kristiania (now Oslo), where he painted 25 paintings for the decoration of Akershus Castle, which had been commissioned by Christopher Urne. He returned to Amsterdam in 1628, where he presented a bankruptcy petition, but was back in Norway in 1636, where he is recorded in 1636, 1639 and 1640 in connection with decorations for castle Akershus, which had burned down for the second time in 1632. From his Norway period there is a painting of a Piece of Silver Ore signed and dated 1632, and a Portrait of Ole Bose, Bishop of Akershus dated 1642, attributed to the artist. In his Hague period he painted winter landscapes and genre scenes. His winter landscapes are similar to the early paintings of Hendrick Avercamp, and he was also influenced by David Vinckboons.
Jan Piet Filedt Kok, 2007
References
Moes and Aubert in Thieme/Becker IV, 1910, pp. 564-65; De Kinkelder in Saur XIV, 1996, pp. 64-65; Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, p. 131; De Kinkelder in The Hague 1998, pp. 104-08
Entry
Prince Maurits is seen with his retinue and bodyguards against the backdrop of skaters on the frozen Hofvijver in The Hague. On the left are the buildings lining the lake, in the centre the houses on the Buitenhof and the Plaats with the tower of the Sint-Jacobskerk above them, and on the right Lange Vijverberg and a small part of the St Sebastian Civic Guard Hall.2See Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, p. 133. On the civic guard parade ground in the centre (later Korte Vijverberg) is a procession of noblemen headed by Prince Maurits, with Prince Frederik Hendrik beside him on the right. Ahead of them are the bodyguards armed with halberds. The sumptuously attired lady on the left wearing a huke, a Flemish-style long hooded cloak topped with a sort of finial, and with her hands in a muff, may be Maurits’s mistress, Margaretha van Mechelen.3Stevens and Zandvliet in Amsterdam 2000a, pp. 289, 293.
The inclusion of portrait groups of contemporary dignitaries in a landscape is first found in a number of paintings by Adriaen van de Venne (among them SK-A-447, SK-A-676 and SK-A-1775). The painting discussed here is the first in a series of scenes in which Maurits, his half-brother Frederik Hendrik and his courtiers are portrayed on foot or on horseback near the Stadholder’s Court, the Hofvijver and the Binnenhof. A slightly later example, datable c. 1622-23, is Prince Maurits Accompanied by Prince Frederik Hendrik, Frederick V of Bohemia and his Wife Elizabeth Stuart, and Others, on the Buitenhof, The Hague (SK-A-452), which is attributed to Pauwels van Hillegaert.4See Stevens and Zandvliet in Amsterdam 2000a, pp. 293-94, no. 144, where it is attributed to Henri Ambrosius Pacx. There is another version in The Hague; see Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, pp. 648-59, no. 59; Van Suchtelen in coll. cat. The Hague 2004a, pp. 128-32, no. 28. It has also been suggested that the figures in the summer scene, View of the Old Hof in The Hague, which is dated 1619 and is now in a private collection, are Prince Maurits and his courtiers.5Panel, 46.8 x 79 cm; illustrated in The Hague 1998, p. 106. There are two other versions of this painting, of which the canvas in the Haags Historisch Museum in The Hague may have been executed by Van Breen in the same period as this one.6Canvas, 98.8 x 175 cm; not signed or dated; see Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, pp. 133-37, no. 6. There is also a smaller and inferior version (panel, 44.5 x 96.5 cm); sale, London (Christie’s), 30 March 1962, no. 102; sale, London (Christie’s), 11 December 1987, no. 56 (ill.). The Hague version, which differs somewhat in the foreground details and the background ice scene, is a more colourful portrayal of the event than the Rijksmuseum painting, which has a thick, discoloured layer of varnish that makes it less attractive. In addition to the fairly loose manner seen in other works by Van Breen, there are the figures’ prominent broad, dark shadows on the ice in the foreground. The date 1618 on the painting stands in contradiction to the dendrochronology results, which indicate that 1620 is the earliest possible date of execution.7See Technical notes. The question arises, therefore, whether the Rijksmuseum painting is Van Breen’s first version of the subject or a later repetition.
It is likely that Adam van Breen came into contact with Prince Maurits in 1617 while preparing his military drill manual Die Nassausche Wapenhandelinge, which Van Breen published in The Hague in 1618. It is conceivable that the first version of this painting was commissioned from him in connection with the book, and because of Maurits’s 50th birthday in 1617.
Jan Piet Filedt Kok, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 32.
Literature
Van Gelder/Van Gelder-Schrijver 1932, pp. 113-14, no. 1; Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, p. 134; De Kinkelder in The Hague 1998, pp. 104-07; Stevens and Zandvliet in Amsterdam 2000a, pp. 289, 293, no. 143
Collection catalogues
1903, pp. 63-64, no. 619; 1934, p. 61, no. 619; 1960, p. 56, no. 619; 1976, p. 143, no. A 955; 2007, no. 32
Citation
J.P. Filedt Kok, 2007, 'Adam van Breen, The Vijverberg, The Hague, in Winter, with Prince Maurits and his Retinue in the Foreground, 1618', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.6234
(accessed 26 April 2025 18:37:32).Footnotes
- 1Two labels with old handwriting on the reverse of the panel.
- 2See Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, p. 133.
- 3Stevens and Zandvliet in Amsterdam 2000a, pp. 289, 293.
- 4See Stevens and Zandvliet in Amsterdam 2000a, pp. 293-94, no. 144, where it is attributed to Henri Ambrosius Pacx. There is another version in The Hague; see Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, pp. 648-59, no. 59; Van Suchtelen in coll. cat. The Hague 2004a, pp. 128-32, no. 28.
- 5Panel, 46.8 x 79 cm; illustrated in The Hague 1998, p. 106.
- 6Canvas, 98.8 x 175 cm; not signed or dated; see Dumas in coll. cat. The Hague 1991b, pp. 133-37, no. 6. There is also a smaller and inferior version (panel, 44.5 x 96.5 cm); sale, London (Christie’s), 30 March 1962, no. 102; sale, London (Christie’s), 11 December 1987, no. 56 (ill.).
- 7See Technical notes.