Dame aan tafel zittend

Caspar Netscher (mogelijk), 1649 - 1684

Dame aan tafel, bij kaarslicht.

  • Soort kunstwerktekening
  • ObjectnummerRP-T-1909-48
  • Afmetingenhoogte 130 mm (bovenhoeken afgerond) x breedte 107 mm
  • Fysieke kenmerkenpenseel in bruin, potlood

Identificatie

  • Titel(s)

    Dame aan tafel zittend

  • Objecttype

  • Objectnummer

    RP-T-1909-48

  • Beschrijving

    Dame aan tafel, bij kaarslicht.

  • Opschriften / Merken

    datum, recto: ‘1664’ (De datering 1664 op recto is niet eigenhandig.)


Vervaardiging

  • Vervaardiging

    • tekenaar: Caspar Netscher (mogelijk)
    • naar tekening van Caspar Netscher
  • Datering

    1649 - 1684

  • Zoek verder op


Materiaal en techniek

  • Fysieke kenmerken

    penseel in bruin, potlood

  • Afmetingen

    hoogte 130 mm (bovenhoeken afgerond) x breedte 107 mm


Dit werk gaat over

  • Onderwerp


Verwerving en rechten


Duurzaam webadres


Caspar Netscher (copy after)

Young Woman Winding a Watch by Candlelight

? Amsterdam, after 1664

Inscriptions

  • inscribed: lower left, probably by the artist, in brown ink, C. Netscher 1664

  • inscribed on verso: upper centre, in an eighteenth- or early nineteenth-century hand, in graphite or pencil, N 24 2 stuks; centre, in an eighteenth- or nineteenth-century hand, in graphite or pencil, with the sheet turned 90°, ƒ 20

  • stamped on verso: lower centre, with the mark of the museum (L. 2228)


Technical notes

watermark: none


Provenance

…; purchased from the dealer F. Muller, Amsterdam, as Caspar Netscher, by the museum (L. 2228), 1909

Object number: RP-T-1909-48


The artist

Biography

Caspar Netscher (Heidelberg c. 1636/39 – 1684 The Hague)

The parentage of this Dutch painter of portraits and genre scenes is unclear. Early sources suggest Heidelberg or Prague as his place of birth and identify his father as Johann or Johannes Netscher (?-c. 1639), a German sculptor from Stuttgart; his mother was said to be the daughter of ‘Vetter’, mayor of Heidelberg. However, Wieseman, in her 2002 monograph on the artist, suggested a more likely candidate as his father was a certain Johannes Netscher (d?-c. 1642), a painter from Rotterdam, who in 1632 married Susanna Jansz (?-1659), widow of the painter and art dealer Maerten van Balckeneynde (?-1631). Both 1636 and 1639 are suggested as the year of birth of their son.1M.E. Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-century Dutch Painting, Doornspijk 2002 (Aetas Aurea: Monographs on Dutch & Flemish Painting, vol. 16), pp. 23-24.

At an early age, Caspar was in Arnhem, where he was apprenticed to Hendrik Coster (active 1638-1659). About 1654-55, Netscher moved to Deventer, where he worked for four or five years in the workshop of Gerard ter Borch (1617-1681).2Ibid., pp. 24-25.

After having worked as a copyist for art dealers, possibly in The Hague, Netscher subsequently set off for Italy, around 1658-59. His journey, however, was soon halted in Bordeaux, where he met his future wife, Margaretha Godijn (?-1694), the daughter of a Walloon Protestant immigrant. According to Houbraken, the couple was married on 26 November 1659. The hostile attitude of the French towards Protestants led Netscher and his family to return to The Netherlands. They settled in The Hague, and in October of that year Netscher joined the local painters’ confraternity, Pictura. In 1668, the artist was granted citizenship of The Hague and subsequently joined the local militia company, the Sint Sebastiaansschutterij ‘De Witte Vendel’.3Ibid., pp. 26-28. Of the eleven children that were born during the 1660s and 1670s, nine survived to adulthood. Two sons, Theodoor (1661-1728) and Constantijn (1668-1723), also became artists.4Ibid. p. 29.

Like many other seventeenth-century artists, Netscher was also active as an art dealer, which was a fairly lucrative side-line with a steady clientele. Moreover, almost immediately after his arrival in The Hague, the artist enjoyed the prestigious patronage of the social and political elite throughout The Netherlands. Johan de Witt (1625-1672), Grand Pensionary of Holland, and Constanijn Huygens I (1596-1687), secretary to the stadholders, commissioned portraits from Netscher. The Tuscan crown prince Cosimo III de’Medici (1642-1723) paid a famous visit to his studio.5Ibid., pp. 32-33.

On Netscher’s death in The Hague on 15 January 1684, his estate, including both his own works and his dealer’s stock, passed to his wife. An inventory, drawn up shortly after her death in 1694, lists 179 paintings, as well as over 300,000 drawings and prints, which were used as models for the instruction of students: ‘dienende voor discipulen om na te teijckenen’. The majority of these possessions passed to his son Constantijn.6Ibid., pp. 34-35.

Paintings
During his early years in The Hague, Netscher painted mostly small genre scenes, dominated by the influence of Ter Borch, noticeable in the use of rather dark colours and a preference for low-life subjects such as stable and kitchen interiors. Around 1664-65, however, Netscher’s manner of painting became looser, his palette brighter and his choice of subjects more pretentious. His sumptuous interiors feature young men and women elegantly dressed in rich silks and brocades. These small-scale, arched-format pictures show the influence of Leiden ‘fine painters’ such as Gerrit Dou (1613-1675) and Frans van Mieris I (1635-1681). Another clearly recognizable source of inspiration for Netscher at this time was the masters of the Delft school, Pieter de Hooch (1629-1684) and Johannes Vermeer (1632-1675).7G. Jansen, ‘Caspar Netscher’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T062008.

After circa 1667 portraiture became Netscher’s main interest. He adopted the elegant, aristocratic court style introduced by Anthony van Dyck (1599-1641) and popularized among the elite of The Hague by Adriaen Hanneman (1614-1671), Jan Mijtens (1614-1670) and Jan de Baen (1633-1702). In contrast to the life-size scale so popular among these painters, Netscher continued to espouse the same small format as his genre pictures.8Ibid.

From the 1670s until his death, Netscher was the most sought-after portrait painter in The Hague. To meet the enormous demand for his work, he resorted to workshop methods such as the in-filling of portrait heads. He also left a large part of the portrait production to his sons Theodoor and Constantijn.9Ibid.

Drawings
Netscher left a large corpus of drawings, many of which can be directly related to his paintings. Compositional studies, in chalks or in pen and ink, were probably used to give prospective clients an idea of his abilities. Such drawings may also have been made by Netscher as ricordi of his painted work. In a few cases, the works carry autograph inscriptions on the versos, documenting when and for whom he had executed the design in oils, and how much money he had received for it. A second, important category of drawings are individual studies of hands and arms in black and white chalk on blue paper. These records would have served as reference and study material for the workshop.10Ibid.

Saskia van Altena, 2021

References
R. de Piles, Abrégé de la vie des peintres, avec des réflexions sur leurs ouvrages, Paris, 1699, pp. 452-56; A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, III (1721), pp. 37, 92-96; C. Hofstede de Groot (ed.), Beschreibendes und kritisches Verzeichnis der Werke der hervorragenden holländischen Maler des XVII. Jahrhunderts, 10 vols., Esslingen 1907-28, V (1912), pp. 146–308; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XXV (1931), p. 398; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, XIV (1956), pp. 143-46; P. Hecht, _De Hollandse fijnschilders. Van Gerard Dou tot Adriaen van der Werff, exh. cat. Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 155-80; E. Buijsen (ed.), Haagse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw. Het Hoogsteder Lexicon van alle schilders werkzaam in Den Haag, 1600-1700, Zwolle 1998, pp. 218-23, 332; M.E. Wieseman, ¬Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-century Dutch Painting, Doornspijk 2002 (Aetas Aurea: Monographs on Dutch & Flemish Painting, vol. 16); G. Jansen, ‘Caspar Netscher’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T062008; M.E. Wieseman, ‘Paper Trails: Drawings in the Work of Caspar Netscher and his Studio’, in V. Manuth and A. Rüger (ed.), Collected Opinions: Essays on Netherlandish Art in Honour of Alfred Bader, London 2004, pp. 248-61; https://rkd.nl/explore/artists/59178


Entry

As noted in the museum’s inventory book (1909), the present sheet is related to a drawing (123 x 98 mm) by Caspar Netscher that once was part of the collection of Cornelis Ploos van Amstel (1726-98), before passing through the collections of Jacob de Vos (1735-1833), Jacob Jacobsz de Vos (1803-78), J.P. Heseltine (1843-1929), and Christiaan P. van Eeghen (1921-214), The Hague.11Cf. Amsterdam 1958, no. 72, fig. 28. Ploos made a facsimile of this drawing, presumably still with the Van Eeghen heirs, using the pioneering mezzotint and etching technique of his famous prenttekeningen (‘print-drawings’) (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-17.277).12Cf. T. Laurentius et al., Cornelis Ploos van Amstel (1726-1798). Kunstverzamelaar en prentuitgever, Assen 1980, no. 57 (113 x 98 mm). There was also a painting of the subject by Caspar Netscher, which belonged to the Medici in Florence in 1713 and since 1753 has been in the Uffizi (inv. no. 1189.13M.E. Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-century Dutch Painting, Doornspijk 2002 (Aetas Aurea: Monographs on Dutch & Flemish Painting, vol. 16), no. 37.

Since Ploos’s facsimile reverses Netscher’s original drawing, the Rijksmuseum sheet is most likely to be a copy of the Ploos/Van Eeghen original and not of the facsimile or painting. An interesting fact is provided by the inscription, including the date ‘1664’: neither the facsimile, nor the original drawing, nor the painting is dated. There must have been some reliable source, since it anticipates Wieseman’s suggested date of circa 1665 for the painting14Ibid., p. 191.

Annemarie Stefes, 2018


Citation

A. Stefes, 2018, 'copy after Caspar Netscher, _, Amsterdam, after 1664', in J. Turner (ed.), _Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200143003

(accessed 23 oktober 2026 14:14:05 UTC+0).

Footnotes

  • 1M.E. Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-century Dutch Painting, Doornspijk 2002 (Aetas Aurea: Monographs on Dutch & Flemish Painting, vol. 16), pp. 23-24.
  • 2Ibid., pp. 24-25.
  • 3Ibid., pp. 26-28.
  • 4Ibid. p. 29.
  • 5Ibid., pp. 32-33.
  • 6Ibid., pp. 34-35.
  • 7G. Jansen, ‘Caspar Netscher’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T062008.
  • 8Ibid.
  • 9Ibid.
  • 10Ibid.
  • 11Cf. Amsterdam 1958, no. 72, fig. 28.
  • 12Cf. T. Laurentius et al., Cornelis Ploos van Amstel (1726-1798). Kunstverzamelaar en prentuitgever, Assen 1980, no. 57 (113 x 98 mm).
  • 13M.E. Wieseman, Caspar Netscher and Late Seventeenth-century Dutch Painting, Doornspijk 2002 (Aetas Aurea: Monographs on Dutch & Flemish Painting, vol. 16), no. 37.
  • 14Ibid., p. 191.