The support is a thin copper plate with a mark (P) on the back. There are horizontal scratches in the plate to improve the adhesion of the ground. The ground layer is smooth and white, and the brushwork in the paint layers is delicate.

Fair. There are small areas of paint loss here and there. The varnish is discoloured.

...; sale, J. Bohn, widow of F. Huurkamp van der Vinne, Haarlem, 2 October 1829, no. 6;¹¹Label on the frame....; sale, Adriaan van der Willigen (1766-1841, Haarlem) and Adriaan van der Willigen Pz (1810-76, Haarlem and Rhedersteeg), Haarlem (A.G. de Visser), 20 April 1874 sqq., no. 21, fl. 55, to the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague (inv. no. 90); transferred to the museum, 1885

Object number: SK-A-4251

Henricus (Henrick) van Zijl (1545-1627) is shown in the last year of his life, at the age of 82. He came from Amersfoort, and from 1592 until his death he was councillor to the Court of Utrecht. Abraham van Bemmel mentions him in his Beschryving van de Stad Amersfoort.²²Van Bemmell, 1760, p. 441: ‘Hendrik van Zijl is eerst Extraordinaris en bij versterf Ordinaris Raad in den Ed. Hove van Utrecht geworden den 4. April 1592 tot den jaare 1627’ (Hendrik van Zijl was first Extraordinary Councillor and on his death Ordinary Councillor at the noble Court of Utrecht, the 4th of April 1592 until the year 1627). The name of the artist who painted this portrait is revealed in a print by Crispijn de Passe the Younger (1594-1670).³³Hollstein XVI, 1974, p. 127, no. 128; Roethlisberger/Bok 1993, I, p. 659; Veldman 2001, p. 304. In 1630 this print engraver and publisher, who was working in Utrecht at the time, engraved a portrait of Van Zijl. The inscription states that De Passe had modelled his print on a painting by Nicolaes van Borculo: ‘Henricus a Zyl Curie Ultraiet Consiliar vives huic effigiei subsequens carmen subscripsit. Octo annis decies completis atque duobus Henrici Zyly talis imago fuit. Obit 1627. Pxit NBorculo Sculpsit Chrisp: Passe Junior 1630’.

De Passe had to work from Van Borculo’s painting of 1627 because Van Zijl was already dead in 1630. There are a few minor differences between the painting and the print. The balustrade with the inscription in the painting was omitted, and the inscription itself differs.

Everhard Korthals Altes, 2007

See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements

This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 27.

Swillens 1934, pp. 95-102; Veldman 2001, pp. 304, 432

1976, p. 133, no. A 4251; 2007, no. 27

E. Korthals Altes, 2007, 'Nicolaes van Borculo, Portrait of Henricus van Zijl (1545-1627), 1627', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20026701