Aan de slag met de collectie:
Barend Klotz (attributed to)
View of the Village of Viersel, near Antwerp
Viersel, 1675
Inscriptions
inscribed and dated by the artist, in brown ink: upper centre, vissel : den 31 maij 1675
inscribed on verso, in graphite: centre left, 183 Z; lower left, 47.
Technical notes
watermark: none
Provenance
…; acquired by the museum (L. 2228) with support of the Vereniging Rembrandt, 18881For security reasons, the drawing was transferred from the Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken to the museum in 1888.
ObjectNumber: RP-T-1888-A-1643
Context
The Rijksmuseum holds a collection of 119 landscape drawings by three late seventeenth-century draughtsmen, Josua de Grave (1643-1712), Valentijn Klotz (c. 1646-1721) and his relative (possibly a brother or cousin?), midshipman (‘adelborst’) Barend Klotz (?-?). During the Franco-Dutch war (1672-78), the three artists accompanied the army of the Dutch States-General under the Stadholder Prince Willem III of Orange (1650-1702) on several campaigns to Brabant, Limburg, Hainaut and East Flanders, during which they depicted the encampments, landscapes, cities and villages they encountered along the way. The three artists probably drew in situ and share a very similar style. They often depicted the same sites or even directly copied each other’s works. Only a few of these sheets are fully signed. As a result, the attributions of several of the drawings in this group have shifted back and forth between the three artists’ oeuvres.
Among these groups of drawings are eleven sheets that form a coherent subset. They are roughly the same format, c. 95 x 150 mm, and were likely part of one or more small sketchbooks. Seven of the eleven sheets include a number inscribed in the upper right corner, which corresponds to the chronology of their production. The drawings might have been numbered when they were still part of a sketchbook. The drawings record specific sites and include prominent buildings, often placed in the centre of the sheet. The overall scene is always seen from a distance. To create depth, the foreground is decorated with trees, shrubberies, figures or a body of water in the case of inv. nos. RP-T-00-174 and RP-T-1901-A-4549. In several drawings dated in autumn months, the trees bear leaves (e.g. inv. nos. RP-T-1912-10, RP-T-1900-A-4441, RP-T-1900-A-4442, RP-T-1898-A-3767 and RP-T-1888-A-1641). Perhaps the artist allowed himself some degree of artistic freedom.
The drawings are carried out in pen and brown ink and finished with grey wash applied in varying degrees of density. Inscriptions appear on all of them and include the location and a date, covering the period between May 1674 to November 1675. The dates are written in the same format: first the word ‘den’ (‘the’), then followed by the day, month and year.
At first glance, the drawings appear to have been made by the same draughtsman, for the handling of the pen and the handwriting reveal very few discrepancies. Stylistically, the drawings come closest to the work of Barend Klotz and Josua de Grave, who used a similar technique to render trees and foliage and who worked in a neater manner than Valentijn Klotz.
When comparing the handwriting on this group of drawings with those of autograph drawings by both artists, it perhaps comes closest to that of Barend Klotz, who used the old-fashioned ‘e’ most consistently and whose handwriting is a little less consistent than De Grave’s, whose penmanship is more elegant and often uses curly (capital) letters. Furthermore, when De Grave added a date to his drawings, he followed a consistently different format: first the year and then the day and month (expressed as a fraction) or a split year with the day and month (expressed as a fraction) at the centre. In this group, by contrast, several variations were used. In several drawings by Barend Klotz (e.g. inv. nos. RP-T-1899-A-4281 and RP-T-1913-50), he added the word ‘drawn’ (gete(e)kent) before the date, a feature that can also be found on one drawing in this ‘numbered sketchbook’ group (inv. no. RP-T-1888-A-1612).2A signed drawing by Barend of the castle in Wouw, Noord-Brabant, in the Special Collections of the University of Leiden (inv. no. P313_2N027) has a similar signature with the additional words, _ geteeckent de 9_ / 22 1671 in the lower right corner, cf. https://geheugen.delpher.nl/nl/geheugen/view?identifier=UBL01%3AP313-2N027.
Assuming the artists worked alongside each other, it is all together possible that their drawings ended up on one large pile and were brought back to their studio. If this were indeed the case, the inscriptions could well have been added at a later point and not necessarily by the artist who made the drawing. This would explain why the inscriptions vary slightly in style and format.
Carolyn Mensing, 2021
The artist
Biography
Barend Klotz (? - ?)
Only one record, related to his position as a midshipman (adelborst) in the Dutch army, exists.3In a notary act, dated 17 February 1672 and signed in Bergen op Zoom, he is referred to as ‘Barnardus Clotz, adelborst onder de compagnie van d’heer capitein Harderwijk’; cf. J.H. van Mosselveld and W.A. van Ham, Tekeningen van Bergen op Zoom. Topografische afbeeldingen van Bergen op Zoom en omgeving uit de zestiende tot en met de achttiende eeuw, exh. cat. Bergen op Zoom (Markiezenhof) 1973-74, p. 17. The Klotz family may have come from the province of Limburg, where the surname was recorded in the seventeenth century.4G. Gordon, ‘Klotz, Barend’, in J. Turner (ed.), The Dictionary of Art, 34 vols., London/New York 1996, XVIII, pp. 140-41. Barend was likely related to fellow draughtsman Valentijn Klotz (c. 1646-1721), who was probably a brother or cousin. Barend was part of the military company of Capt. Harderwijk (?-?), the leader of the naval department of the Dutch army, founded in Maastricht in 1668.5J.H. van Mosselveld and W.A. van Ham, Tekeningen van Bergen op Zoom. Topografische afbeeldingen van Bergen op Zoom en omgeving uit de zestiende tot en met de achttiende eeuw, exh. cat. Bergen op Zoom (Markiezenhof) 1973-74, p. 17. In Maastricht, he likely met fellow draughtsman Josua de Grave (1643-1712). After being stationed in Bergen op Zoom (1671-early 1672), Barend and Valentijn Klotz and Josua de Grave accompanied the army during their campaigns in the southern Netherlands in 1672, 1674, 1675 and 1676.
Barend Klotz signed and dated his works only occasionally (e.g. inv. no. RP-T-00-736). Consequently, scholars seem to have been hesitant about attributing drawings to the artist. Furthermore, his style is very close to that of Valentijn Klotz and Josua de Grave. Based on the few inscriptions found on his sheets, Mosseveld and Van Ham were able to describe Barend Klotz’s handwriting and attribute a number of drawings of sites in Bergen op Zoom to the artist.6Ibid., pp. 15-17. Overall, his handwriting is neater than that of Valentijn, but not as consistent as that of Josua de Grave. His ‘w’, as well as his ‘p’ and ‘z’, are quite distinguishable; also noteworthy is his sparse use of capital letters.7Ibid. Barend used a very distinct old-fashioned ‘e’, adding an additional loop through the ‘o’. Further, he included the words ‘geteekent de’ [accompanied with a date and place] on several of his drawings. Based on this information, various drawings in the Rijksmuseum’s collection could be (tentatively) reattributed to the artist.
Carolyn Mensing, 2020
References
R. van Eijnden and A. van der Willigen, ‘Klotz, Valentijn’, in U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XX (1927), pp. 549-50; R.J.G.M. van Hasselt, ‘Drie tekenaars van topografische prenten in Brabant en elders. Valentijn Klotz, Josua de Grave en Constantijn Huygens Jr.’, Jaarboek Oudheidkundige Kring ‘De Ghulden Roos’ 25 (1965), pp. 145-55; M.H. Breitbarth-van der Stok, ‘Josua de Grave, Valentinus Klotz en Bernardus Klotz’, Bulletin Koninklijke Nederlandse Oudheidkundige Bond 68 (1969), pp. 99-101; J.H. van Mosselveld and W.A. van Ham, Tekeningen van Bergen op Zoom. Topografische afbeeldingen van Bergen op Zoom en omgeving uit de zestiende tot en met de achttiende eeuw, exh. cat. Bergen op Zoom (Markiezenhof) 1973-74, pp. 15-18; G. Gordon, ‘Klotz, Valentijn’, in J. Turner (ed.), The Dictionary of Art, 34 vols., London/New York 1996, XVIII, pp. 140-41 ; P. Groenendijk, Beknopt biografisch lexicon van Zuid- en Noord-Nederlandse schilders, graveurs, glasschilders, tapijtwevers et cetera van ca. 1350 tot ca. 1720, Leiden 2008, p. 466
Entry
From 26 May to 6 June 1675, the Dutch army stayed in Duffel in the province of Antwerp, from where Stadholder Prince Willem III of Orange (1650-1702) undertook little trips to inspect the encampments nearby. The Stadholder stayed at Kasteel Muggenberg in Duffel, where he met with Maurits Lodewijk van Nassau-LaLecq (1631-1683) and with the Spanish commander, Carlos de Aragón de Gurrea, 9th Duke of Villahermosa (1634-1692).8J.F. Heijbroek, Met Huygens op reis. Tekeningen en dagboeknotities van Constantijn Huygens jr. (1628-1697), secretaris van stadhouder-koning Willem III, exh. cat Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum), 1982, no. 34. Viersel is about 15 kilometres from Duffel, and the village was one of the locations where the army often resided during the campaigns between 1673 and 1678. The rectory of the church sometimes served as lodging for the Dutch soldiers.9B. Daems, Verbeeld land. De provincie Antwerpen in tekeningen, 1600-1900, Antwerp 2006, p. 58, no. 32. Klotz must have hiked out there while staying in Duffel. The church featured prominently at the centre of the drawing is the Sint-Willibrorduskerk, depicted from the south-east.
The year 1659, written on the roof of the church, probably refers to the year of its replacement. The new church bell was installed in 1661. During the religious wars of the second half of the sixteenth century, the fourteenth-century church was completely destroyed, and in 1628 the largely rebuilt church was lost to fire. The church that Klotz recorded was therefore brand new.10Ibid.
Carolyn Mensing, 2019
Literature
R.J.G.M. van Hasselt, ‘Drie tekenaars van topografische prenten in Brabant en elders. Valentijn Klotz, Josua de Grave en Constantijn Huygens Jr.’, Jaarboek Oudheidkundige Kring ‘De Ghulden Roos’ 25 (1965), pp. 145-92; B. Daems, Verbeeld land. De provincie Antwerpen in tekeningen, 1600-1900, Antwerp 2006, p. 58, no. 32
Citation
C. Mensing, 2019, 'attributed to Barend Klotz, View of the Village of Viersel, near Antwerp, Viersel, 1675-05-31', in J. Turner (ed.), Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.54303
(accessed 17 May 2025 15:51:27).Footnotes
- 1For security reasons, the drawing was transferred from the Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken to the museum in 1888.
- 2A signed drawing by Barend of the castle in Wouw, Noord-Brabant, in the Special Collections of the University of Leiden (inv. no. P3132N027) has a similar signature with the additional words, _ geteeckent de 9 / 22 1671 in the lower right corner, cf. https://geheugen.delpher.nl/nl/geheugen/view?identifier=UBL01%3AP313-2N027.
- 3In a notary act, dated 17 February 1672 and signed in Bergen op Zoom, he is referred to as ‘Barnardus Clotz, adelborst onder de compagnie van d’heer capitein Harderwijk’; cf. J.H. van Mosselveld and W.A. van Ham, Tekeningen van Bergen op Zoom. Topografische afbeeldingen van Bergen op Zoom en omgeving uit de zestiende tot en met de achttiende eeuw, exh. cat. Bergen op Zoom (Markiezenhof) 1973-74, p. 17.
- 4G. Gordon, ‘Klotz, Barend’, in J. Turner (ed.), The Dictionary of Art, 34 vols., London/New York 1996, XVIII, pp. 140-41.
- 5J.H. van Mosselveld and W.A. van Ham, Tekeningen van Bergen op Zoom. Topografische afbeeldingen van Bergen op Zoom en omgeving uit de zestiende tot en met de achttiende eeuw, exh. cat. Bergen op Zoom (Markiezenhof) 1973-74, p. 17.
- 6Ibid., pp. 15-17.
- 7Ibid.
- 8J.F. Heijbroek, Met Huygens op reis. Tekeningen en dagboeknotities van Constantijn Huygens jr. (1628-1697), secretaris van stadhouder-koning Willem III, exh. cat Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum), 1982, no. 34.
- 9B. Daems, Verbeeld land. De provincie Antwerpen in tekeningen, 1600-1900, Antwerp 2006, p. 58, no. 32.
- 10Ibid.