Aan de slag met de collectie:
Tweeluikje met de heilsgeschiedenis
anoniem, ca. 1375
Diptiek van ivoor met gesneden voorstellingen in reliëf. Op de linkervleugel zijn de Kruisiging en de Geboorte van Christus, verbeeld, op de rechtervleugel het Laatste Oordeel en de Aanbidding der Koningen.
- Soort kunstwerktweeluik, reliëf
- ObjectnummerBK-1992-28
- Afmetingengeheel: hoogte 203 mm (hoogte geheel) x breedte 195 mm (breedte geheel), luik: breedte 95 mm (breedte van een luik)
- Fysieke kenmerkenivoor
Identificatie
Titel(s)
- Tweeluikje met de heilsgeschiedenis
- Diptiek met de Heilsgeschiedenis in vier scènes
Objecttype
Objectnummer
BK-1992-28
Beschrijving
Diptiek van ivoor met gesneden voorstellingen in reliëf. Op de linkervleugel zijn de Kruisiging en de Geboorte van Christus, verbeeld, op de rechtervleugel het Laatste Oordeel en de Aanbidding der Koningen.
Opschriften / Merken
- opschrift, achterzijde linkervleugel, in inkt: ‘Quator eburnean // Imagines, dicuntur // opera Seculi 800mi’ (De eerste O is in vier kwarten verdeeld door een verticale en een horizontale lijn.)
- inscriptie, achterzijde rechtervleugel, in inkt: ‘verus Possessor // Albergatus Ehlen // Prior Cartusiae // Trevirensis. // 1781.’
Onderdeel van catalogus
Vervaardiging
Vervaardiging
- ivoorsnijder: anoniem, Maasstreek
- ivoorsnijder: anoniem, Noord-Frankrijk
Datering
ca. 1375
Zoek verder op
Materiaal en techniek
Fysieke kenmerken
ivoor
Afmetingen
- geheel: hoogte 203 mm (hoogte geheel) x breedte 195 mm (breedte geheel)
- luik: breedte 95 mm (breedte van een luik)
Dit werk gaat over
Onderwerp
Verwerving en rechten
Credit line
Schenking van mevrouw J.M. Neutelings-Heuts, Brasschaat
Verwerving
schenking 1992
Copyright
Herkomst
…; collection Albergatus Ehlen, prior of the Carthusians in Trier, 1781;{Inscription right wing of the diptych on the reverse.} transferred to the Welschnonnenkloster, Trier, c. 1794;{First recorded there in 1868, see E. Aus’m Weerth, _Kunstdenkmäler des christlichen Mittelalters in den Rheinlanden: Bildnerei_, Bonn 1868, no. 7 on p. 91 and pl. LVIII. According to Peter te Poel, Albergatus Ehlen may have secured the ivory at the Welschnonnenkloster when the Carthusian monastery in Trier was dissolved following the arrival of the French in 1794. Given the inscription, the ivory diptych was probably his personal property and found a safe haven with the nuns (Augustinian canonesses), who were allowed to remain in Trier. Written communication to Frits Scholten, 5 September 2026. For the Welschnonnen in Trier during this period, see J.P. Muth, _Die Kongregation Unserer lieben Frau von Trier: Welschnonnenkloster. Eine kirchenrechtliche Studie zur Entwicklung des Instituts der Religiösen Genossenschaften unter dem französischen Konsulat und ersten Kaiserreich_, Strasbourg 1907.} with the nuns, transferred to the Couvent des Dames Chanoinesses de Saint-Augustin, Jupille-sur-Meuse, near Liège, 1878;{The Welschonnenkloster in Trier was dissolved by the Prussian government in 1875. The nuns re-established their community and school just across the border in Jupille in 1878. With thanks to Peter te Poel for this information.} …; collection Mgr Emilius (‘Émile’) Schoolmeesters (1842-1914), Liège, by 1905;{Mentioned as being in the possession of this prominent local historian in M.G. Terme, _L’art ancien au pays de Liège: Album de l’Exposition universelle de Liège 1905_, exh. cat. Liège [1907], pl. XXXIII. Perhaps the diptych was presented to him as a gift by the Augustinian nuns, either because of his possible involvement in their establishment in Jupille or on account of his appointment as vicar general of the Diocese of Liège in December 1901. Earlier, he had been dean of the Église Saint-Jacques in Liège (1876-1901). For his biography, see Ch. Dury, ‘Émile Schoolmeesters’, in D. Allart et al. (ed.), _L’église Saint-Jacques à Liège. Templum pulcherrimum. Une histoire, un patrimoine_, Namur 2016, p. 306 and Idem, ‘Émile Schoolmeesters’, in P. Colman and P. Paquet (eds.), _L’église Saint-Jacques à Liège. Carnet du patrimoine_ 154, Namur (Agence wallonne du Patrimoine) 2018, p. 14.} acquired from his French heirs, through the mediation of the Antwerp dealer Bernard Blondeel, by Willem Neutelings (1916-1986), Brasschaat, 1981;{Before acquiring the piece, Neutelings had asked Peter te Poel to assess the ivory’s authenticity around 1980. According to Te Poel, Blondeel had brought it from the Schoolmeesters family in France to show it to Neutelings, who subsequently acquired it directly from the family, rather than from Blondeel, who merely acted as an intermediary. Te Poel remembers that ‘it was difficult for Wim [Willem Neutelings] to determine an offer for the ivory. An object of such a large size had not been on the art market for a very long time. Wim told me that, using ‘average-sized’ ivories in Sotheby’s auction catalogues as a basis, he first calculated their surface in square centimetres (as one would with a plot of land) and then determined [the price] per square centimetre. He applied this value per square centimetre to the number [of square centimetres] of the large ivory diptych and added an extra amount to the total to account for the uniqueness of the piece. Thus, the ivory had not been on the art market.’ Written communication to Frits Scholten, 5 September 2026.} his wife Jeanne Neutelings-Heuts, Brasschaat, 1986; by whom, donated to the museum, 1992
Documentatie
- E. Aus'M Weerth, Kunstdenkmaeler des Christlichen Mittelalters in den Rheinlanden, Bonn 1866, pl. LVIII, nr. 7
- E.G. Grimme, 'Neue Zugänge zu den Sammlungen des Suermondt-Muserum. Ein Französisches Elfenbeindyptichon des 14. Jahrhunderts', Aachener Kunstblätter 30 (1965), p. 8
Duurzaam webadres
Als u naar dit object wilt verwijzen, gebruik dan de duurzame URL:
Vragen?
Ziet u een fout? Of heeft u extra informatie over dit object? Laat het ons weten!
anonymous
Diptych with the Nativity, Adoration of the Magi, Crucifixion and the Last Judgement
Meuse area, Northern France, c. 1375
Inscriptions
- inscription, on the reverse of the right wing, in ink:verus Possessor // Albergatus Ehlen // Prior Cartusiae // Trevirensis. // 1781.([the] rightful owner [is] Albergatus Ehlen, prior of the Carthusians in Trier. 1781.)
- inscription, on the reverse of the left wing, in ink:Quator eburnean // Imagines, dicuntur // opera Seculi 800mi(Four ivory images [of which] it is said [that they are] works from the 8th century)
Technical notes
Carved in relief and originally furnished with hinges.
Scientific examination and reports
- condition report: D. van Loosdrecht, RMA, 23 februari 1996
Condition
The hinges are missing and the securing points have been restored.
Provenance
…; collection Albergatus Ehlen, prior of the Carthusians in Trier, 1781;1Inscription right wing of the diptych on the reverse. transferred to the Welschnonnenkloster, Trier, c. 1794;2First recorded there in 1868, see E. Aus’m Weerth, Kunstdenkmäler des christlichen Mittelalters in den Rheinlanden: Bildnerei, Bonn 1868, no. 7 on p. 91 and pl. LVIII. According to Peter te Poel, Albergatus Ehlen may have secured the ivory at the Welschnonnenkloster when the Carthusian monastery in Trier was dissolved following the arrival of the French in 1794. Given the inscription, the ivory diptych was probably his personal property and found a safe haven with the nuns (Augustinian canonesses), who were allowed to remain in Trier. Written communication to Frits Scholten, 5 September 2026. For the Welschnonnen in Trier during this period, see J.P. Muth, Die Kongregation Unserer lieben Frau von Trier: Welschnonnenkloster. Eine kirchenrechtliche Studie zur Entwicklung des Instituts der Religiösen Genossenschaften unter dem französischen Konsulat und ersten Kaiserreich, Strasbourg 1907. with the nuns, transferred to the Couvent des Dames Chanoinesses de Saint-Augustin, Jupille-sur-Meuse, near Liège, 1878;3The Welschonnenkloster in Trier was dissolved by the Prussian government in 1875. The nuns re-established their community and school just across the border in Jupille in 1878. With thanks to Peter te Poel for this information. …; collection Mgr Emilius (‘Émile’) Schoolmeesters (1842-1914), Liège, by 1905;4Mentioned as being in the possession of this prominent local historian in M.G. Terme, L’art ancien au pays de Liège: Album de l’Exposition universelle de Liège 1905, exh. cat. Liège [1907], pl. XXXIII. Perhaps the diptych was presented to him as a gift by the Augustinian nuns, either because of his possible involvement in their establishment in Jupille or on account of his appointment as vicar general of the Diocese of Liège in December 1901. Earlier, he had been dean of the Église Saint-Jacques in Liège (1876-1901). For his biography, see Ch. Dury, ‘Émile Schoolmeesters’, in D. Allart et al. (ed.), L’église Saint-Jacques à Liège. Templum pulcherrimum. Une histoire, un patrimoine, Namur 2016, p. 306 and Idem, ‘Émile Schoolmeesters’, in P. Colman and P. Paquet (eds.), L’église Saint-Jacques à Liège. Carnet du patrimoine 154, Namur (Agence wallonne du Patrimoine) 2018, p. 14. acquired from his French heirs, through the mediation of the Antwerp dealer Bernard Blondeel, by Willem Neutelings (1916-1986), Brasschaat, 1981;5Before acquiring the piece, Neutelings had asked Peter te Poel to assess the ivory’s authenticity around 1980. According to Te Poel, Blondeel had brought it from the Schoolmeesters family in France to show it to Neutelings, who subsequently acquired it directly from the family, rather than from Blondeel, who merely acted as an intermediary. Te Poel remembers that ‘it was difficult for Wim [Willem Neutelings] to determine an offer for the ivory. An object of such a large size had not been on the art market for a very long time. Wim told me that, using ‘average-sized’ ivories in Sotheby’s auction catalogues as a basis, he first calculated their surface in square centimetres (as one would with a plot of land) and then determined [the price] per square centimetre. He applied this value per square centimetre to the number [of square centimetres] of the large ivory diptych and added an extra amount to the total to account for the uniqueness of the piece. Thus, the ivory had not been on the art market.’ Written communication to Frits Scholten, 5 September 2026. his wife Jeanne Neutelings-Heuts, Brasschaat, 1986; by whom, donated to the museum, 1992
Object number: BK-1992-28
Credit line: Gift of J.M. Neutelings-Heuts, Brasschaat
Entry
In the eighteenth century, this ivory diptych was in the possession of a Carthusian monk residing in the city of Trier: written in ink on the reverse of the right-hand wing (fig. a) is a Latin inscription that reads: verus Possessor Albergatus Ehlen Prior Cartusiae Trevirensis. 1781. ([the] rightful owner [is] Albergatus Ehlen, prior of the Carthusians in Trier). Inscribed on the reverse of the left-hand wing (fig. b), we find the following text: Quator eburnea Imagines, dicuntur opera Seculi 800mi (Four ivory images [of which] it is said [that they are] works from the 8th century). Inscriptions of this kind are not only rare, but also of particular importance when attempting to establish the history of the use and reception of such diptychs.6E. von Philippovich, ‘Elfenbensarbejder i Thorvaldsens Museum’, Meddeleser fra Thorvaldsens Museum 1962, pp. 71-78, esp. pp. 75-78; E.D. Schmidt, ‘Paul Heermann’s ivoren “Samson en twee Filistijnen” naar Michelangelo’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 45 (1997), pp. 135-51, esp. p. 105, note 13. Ehlen refers to himself as the ‘true owner’, possibly implying that the diptych was his own personal possession as opposed to belonging to the Carthusian monastery itself. The diptych would then have been used for private devotion, the very same purpose for which it was originally commissioned centuries before. Equally telling is the prior’s perception that the ivory might have been carved in the eighth century. He was therefore very well aware of the object’s significant antiquity, albeit purportedly six centuries too early. In reality, the diptych was produced around the third quarter of the fourteenth century, most likely in the Mosan region or north-eastern France.7Oral communication, Richard Randall, 8 September 1993.
The iconography of this small work concerns the life of Christ, essentially forming a highly condensed narrative depiction of Christian Salvation history. The diptych bears four traditional scenes (reading from the left-hand to the right-hand panel): in the lower registers, the Nativity (left wing) and the Adoration of the Magi (right wing); in the upper registers, the Crucifixion and the Last Judgment. Among fourteenth-century diptychs of this sort, only the scene of the Last Judgment signals a relatively new element, possibly betraying a northern influence.8R.H. Randall, Masterpieces of Ivory from the Walters Art Gallery, coll. cat. Baltimore 1985, no. 310. The Nativity is the moment of the incarnation, when Christ became flesh – in effect, the starting point of God’s plan for the world’s salvation. The three kings precede the worshipper in prayer and adoration – a scene formally echoed in the scene appearing above it, in which Mary and John the Evangelist intercede before Christ. These figures of adoration and intercession were presented to the diptych’s medieval user – in all probability, the member of a monastic community – as exempla, implicitly offering him the prospective reward of a place in heaven.9H. Stahl, ‘Narrative Structure and Content in Some Gothic Ivories of the Life of Christ’, in P. Barnet (ed.), Images in Ivory: Precious Objects of the Gothic Age, exh. cat. Detroit (Detroit Institute of Arts)/Baltimore (Walters Art Gallery) 1997, pp. 94-114, esp. p. 105. In the scene of the Adoration of the Magi, Mary’s coronation by an angel likewise refers to this heavenly reward. By reading and meditating on these scenes in this manner, and above all by living a life in accordance with the message they conveyed, the worshipper was reminded of Christ’s role as saviour.
A sequence of these four scenes was by no means uncommon among examples of fourteenth-century ivory-carving in north-western Europe. A diptych in the Schnütgen Museum in Cologne displays exactly the same scenes, even if some details of the iconography have been omitted.10H. van Os et al., Gebed in schoonheid: Schatten van privé-devotie in Europa: 1300-1500, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1994-95, pp. 74-75. Missing in the background of the Nativity, for instance, is the small figure of Joseph, to whom the angel behind the arch – still present, though now without purpose – proclaims the birth of his son. In terms of style and iconography, a diptych in the Suermondt-Ludwig Museum in Aachen bears a far greater similarity to the Amsterdam ivory.11E.G. Grimme, ‘Neuzugänge zu den Sammlungen des Suermondt-Museums’, Aachener Kunstblätter 30 (1965), p. 7-19, esp. p. 8, no. 1; H. van Os et al., Gebed in schoonheid: Schatten van privé-devotie in Europa: 1300-1500, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1994-95, pp. 74-75. Three of the four scenes are in fact exactly alike; with the exception of the Last Judgment, which has been replaced by the Coronation of the Virgin. There is no doubt that both ivories came from the same (Mosan?) workshop, where any one of these scenes could apparently be combined in accordance with the patron’s wish.
Frits Scholten, 2024
Literature
E. Aus’m Weerth, Kunstdenkmäler des christlichen Mittelalters in den Rheinlanden: Bildnerei, Bonn 1868, no. 7 on p. 91 and pl. LVIII; M.G. Terme, L’art ancien au pays de Liège: Album de l’Exposition universelle de Liège 1905, exh. cat. Liège [1907], pl. XXXIII; R. Koechlin, Les ivoires gothiques français, 3 vols., Paris 1924, vol. 2, no. 783, pl. CXXXII; E.G. Grimme, ‘Neuzugänge zu den Sammlungen des Suermondt-Museums’, Aachener Kunstblätter 30 (1965), p. 7-19, esp. p. 8, no. 1; H. Schnitzler, Das Schnütgen-Museum: Eine Auswahl, coll. cat. Cologne 1968, under no. 104; R.H. Randall, Masterpieces of Ivory from the Walters Art Gallery, coll. cat. Baltimore 1985, under no. 310; ‘Keuze uit recente schenkingen en legaten’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 40 (1992), pp. 290-323, esp. pp. 297-98, fig. 9; H. van Os et al., Gebed in schoonheid: Schatten van privé-devotie in Europa: 1300-1500, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1994-95, pp. 10-13, 25, 74, 175; ‘Recent Acquisitions at the Department of Sculpture and Decorative Arts, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam’, The Burlington Magazine 137 (1995), pp. 419-24, esp. p. 421, no. VII; H. van Os, Een engel in de koffer: Willem Neutelings en zijn verzameling, Baarn 1996, pp. 7, 27-28 and fig. 33; H. Stahl, ‘Narrative Structure and Content in Some Gothic Ivories of the Life of Christ’, in P. Barnet (ed.), Images in Ivory: Precious Objects of the Gothic Age, exh. cat. Detroit (Detroit Institute of Arts)/Baltimore (Walters Art Gallery) 1997, pp. 94-114, esp. pp. 104-05 and fig. VII-6; F. Scholten and G. de Werd, Een hogere werkelijkheid: Duitse en Franse beeldhouwkunst 1200-1600 uit het Rijksmuseum Amsterdam/Eine höhere Wirklichkeit, Deutsche und Französische Skulptur 1200-1600 aus dem Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, exh. cat. Cleves (Museum Kurhaus Kleve) 2004-06, no. 60; P. te Poel, Collectie Neutelings Bonnefantenmuseum, coll. cat. Maastricht 2007, pp. 12, 13, 44, 88, 94; F. Scholten (ed.), 1100-1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 2015, no. 11; L. Hendrikman (ed.), Collectie Neutelings: Vier eeuwen middeleeuwse sculptuur, coll. cat. Maastricht (Bonnefantenmuseum) 2016, pp. 15-16, fig. VIII
Citation
F. Scholten, 2024, 'anonymous, Diptych with the Nativity, Adoration of the Magi, Crucifixion and the Last Judgement, Meuse area, c. 1375', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200140405
(accessed 4 oktober 2026 16:18:59 UTC+0).Footnotes
- 1Inscription right wing of the diptych on the reverse.
- 2First recorded there in 1868, see E. Aus’m Weerth, Kunstdenkmäler des christlichen Mittelalters in den Rheinlanden: Bildnerei, Bonn 1868, no. 7 on p. 91 and pl. LVIII. According to Peter te Poel, Albergatus Ehlen may have secured the ivory at the Welschnonnenkloster when the Carthusian monastery in Trier was dissolved following the arrival of the French in 1794. Given the inscription, the ivory diptych was probably his personal property and found a safe haven with the nuns (Augustinian canonesses), who were allowed to remain in Trier. Written communication to Frits Scholten, 5 September 2026. For the Welschnonnen in Trier during this period, see J.P. Muth, Die Kongregation Unserer lieben Frau von Trier: Welschnonnenkloster. Eine kirchenrechtliche Studie zur Entwicklung des Instituts der Religiösen Genossenschaften unter dem französischen Konsulat und ersten Kaiserreich, Strasbourg 1907.
- 3The Welschonnenkloster in Trier was dissolved by the Prussian government in 1875. The nuns re-established their community and school just across the border in Jupille in 1878. With thanks to Peter te Poel for this information.
- 4Mentioned as being in the possession of this prominent local historian in M.G. Terme, L’art ancien au pays de Liège: Album de l’Exposition universelle de Liège 1905, exh. cat. Liège [1907], pl. XXXIII. Perhaps the diptych was presented to him as a gift by the Augustinian nuns, either because of his possible involvement in their establishment in Jupille or on account of his appointment as vicar general of the Diocese of Liège in December 1901. Earlier, he had been dean of the Église Saint-Jacques in Liège (1876-1901). For his biography, see Ch. Dury, ‘Émile Schoolmeesters’, in D. Allart et al. (ed.), L’église Saint-Jacques à Liège. Templum pulcherrimum. Une histoire, un patrimoine, Namur 2016, p. 306 and Idem, ‘Émile Schoolmeesters’, in P. Colman and P. Paquet (eds.), L’église Saint-Jacques à Liège. Carnet du patrimoine 154, Namur (Agence wallonne du Patrimoine) 2018, p. 14.
- 5Before acquiring the piece, Neutelings had asked Peter te Poel to assess the ivory’s authenticity around 1980. According to Te Poel, Blondeel had brought it from the Schoolmeesters family in France to show it to Neutelings, who subsequently acquired it directly from the family, rather than from Blondeel, who merely acted as an intermediary. Te Poel remembers that ‘it was difficult for Wim [Willem Neutelings] to determine an offer for the ivory. An object of such a large size had not been on the art market for a very long time. Wim told me that, using ‘average-sized’ ivories in Sotheby’s auction catalogues as a basis, he first calculated their surface in square centimetres (as one would with a plot of land) and then determined [the price] per square centimetre. He applied this value per square centimetre to the number [of square centimetres] of the large ivory diptych and added an extra amount to the total to account for the uniqueness of the piece. Thus, the ivory had not been on the art market.’ Written communication to Frits Scholten, 5 September 2026.
- 6E. von Philippovich, ‘Elfenbensarbejder i Thorvaldsens Museum’, Meddeleser fra Thorvaldsens Museum 1962, pp. 71-78, esp. pp. 75-78; E.D. Schmidt, ‘Paul Heermann’s ivoren “Samson en twee Filistijnen” naar Michelangelo’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 45 (1997), pp. 135-51, esp. p. 105, note 13.
- 7Oral communication, Richard Randall, 8 September 1993.
- 8R.H. Randall, Masterpieces of Ivory from the Walters Art Gallery, coll. cat. Baltimore 1985, no. 310.
- 9H. Stahl, ‘Narrative Structure and Content in Some Gothic Ivories of the Life of Christ’, in P. Barnet (ed.), Images in Ivory: Precious Objects of the Gothic Age, exh. cat. Detroit (Detroit Institute of Arts)/Baltimore (Walters Art Gallery) 1997, pp. 94-114, esp. p. 105.
- 10H. van Os et al., Gebed in schoonheid: Schatten van privé-devotie in Europa: 1300-1500, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1994-95, pp. 74-75.
- 11E.G. Grimme, ‘Neuzugänge zu den Sammlungen des Suermondt-Museums’, Aachener Kunstblätter 30 (1965), p. 7-19, esp. p. 8, no. 1; H. van Os et al., Gebed in schoonheid: Schatten van privé-devotie in Europa: 1300-1500, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1994-95, pp. 74-75.











