Aan de slag met de collectie:
Pieter Jansz Saenredam
Interior of the St Odulphuskerk in Assendelft, Seen from the Choir to the West
1649
Inscriptions
- signature and date, lower left, on the pew in the choir:dit is de kerck tot Assendelft, een dorp in Hollandt, van / Pieter Saenredam, dese geschildert int jaer 1649. den 2. October(This is the church of Assendelft, a village in Holland, by Pieter Saenredam, painted in the year 1649, the 2nd of October)
- inscription, lower right on the tombstone:Iohannis Saenredam / sculptoris celeberrimi. / Petri de Ionge XLIV annos Assendelphi / praetoris. / Gerardi de Ionge filii I.V.D. et advocati. / Iacet hic quod fvit.(Here lie the remains of Jan Saenredam, celebrated engraver, Pieter de Jonge, sheriff of Assendelft for 44 years, his son Petrus de Jonge, doctor of jurisprudence and attorney)
- inscription, centre right, along the upper edge of the tomb:dit is de TOMBE ofte begraefplaets vande heeren tot assendelft.(This is the tomb or burial place of the lords of Assendelft.)
- inscription, centre right, along the lower edge of the tombe:dit is [...] kerck Assendelft [...] in hollan [...] / Saenredam 1649 volschildert(This is [...] Assendelft church [...] in Hollan[d] [...] Saenredam 1649 completed)
Technical notes
The support is a horizontally grained oak plank bevelled on all sides. Dendrochronology has shown that the youngest heartwood ring was formed in 1621. The panel could have been ready for use by 1632, but a date in or after 1638 is more likely. The smooth ground layer, visible along the edges, is pinkish. Infrared reflectography revealed a detailed, linear underdrawing, transferred from a preliminary construction drawing by indentation. The design was coloured in a limited palette of grey, beige and ochre, leaving much of the underdrawn architectural lines exposed. The inscription along the lower edge of the tomb at centre right was overpainted by the artist and replaced by the inscription on the left. The paint was generally applied thickly and opaquely. Impasto was used to suggest texture and for the modelling of details. The figures, predominantly executed in black, were included during the painting process.
Scientific examination and reports
- infrared reflectography: J.R.J. van Asperen de Boer, RKD, 1970
- dendrochronology: P. Klein, RMA, 24 november 1998
- technical report: M. Chavannes, RMA, 31 januari 2005
Literature scientific examination and reports
Van Asperen de Boer 1971, pp. 25-26
Condition
Fair. There is tenting paint throughout, particularly in the lower half of the painting. Retouchings in the tile floor and the pews are discoloured, and there is a loss in the figure by the left side of the door in the background.
Conservation
- conservator unknown, 1914: blisters repaired; revarnished
- L. Kuiper, 1970: loose paint consolidated; retouched and revarnished
- M. van de Laar, 1992: paint layers consolidated; old fillings repaired and some retouchings removed; retouched and revarnished
Provenance
...; sale, J.V.D.H. (†), Zoeterwoude, near Leiden (P. de Bruyn), 11 September 1776, no. 79 (‘P. Saenredam, 1649, 2 October. De Kerk te Assendelft van binne te zien, terwyl ’er gepredikt word voor eenige Toehoorders, benevens de Tombe of Begraavplaats vande Heeren tot Assendelft, [...] op penneel, hoog 19½, breet 29 duim’ [50 x 74.5 cm]);...; sale, Jeronimo de Bosch III (1740-1811), Amsterdam (J. Yver et al.), 6 April 1812, no. 51 (‘De Kerk te Assendelft van binnen. [...] door P.J. Saenredam. Hoog 20, breed 29 duim [51.4 x 74.5 cm.] Paneel’), fl. 131, to the dealer Jeronimo de Vries, Amsterdam;1Copy RKD. from whom, fl. 600, to Adriaan van der Hoop, Amsterdam, 17 January 1848;2Van der Hoop Lijst, p. 38, no. 235: ‘Van den Heer J:o de Vries overgenomen eene voorstelling van de kerk te Assendelft, door P. Saenredam; en is dit Schilderij geteekend door hem, met het jaartel 1649, zijnde zeer helder en fijn uitgewerkt; voor de Som van ... 600’. by whom bequeathed to the City of Amsterdam with the rest of his collection, 1854;3Van der Hoop Taxatie 1854, p. 2, no. 235: ‘Gezigt in de kerk te Assendelft, fl. 100’. on loan from the City of Amsterdam to the museum since 30 June 1885 4Provenance reconstructed in Pollmer 2004, p. 172, no. 154.
ObjectNumber: SK-C-217
Credit line: On loan from the City of Amsterdam (A. van der Hoop Bequest)
The artist
Biography
Pieter Jansz Saenredam (Assendelft 1597 - Haarlem 1665)
Pieter Jansz Saenredam, son of the engraver Jan Pietersz Saenredam and Anna Pauwelsdr, was born on 9 June 1597 in Assendelft. In 1608, a year after his father’s death, he and his mother moved to Haarlem. According to Cornelis de Bie, Saenredam studied painting with Frans Pietersz de Grebber from 1612 till 1622. On 24 April 1623, he joined the Haarlem Guild of St. Luke, in which he played an active role; between 1633 and 1642, he is mentioned as secretary, warden and dean. On 5 December 1638, he married Aefjen Gerrits in Bloemendaal near Haarlem. Their only child, a daughter named Anna, was born in 1639.
Saenredam was acquainted with the architect Jacob van Campen, who was his fellow pupil in De Grebber’s workshop, and with Constantijn Huygens, private secretary to the Dutch stadholder. A portrait of Saenredam drawn by Jacob van Campen in 1628 has led to the speculation that he was hunchbacked, but there is no evidence to support this. Saenredam lived all of his life in Haarlem, but went on sketching tours to other towns, such as ’s-Hertogenbosch (1632), Assendelft (1633, 1634, 1643 and 1654), Alkmaar (1635/38 and 1661), Utrecht (1636), Amsterdam (1641), and Rhenen (1644). On 31 December 1652 he and the Haarlem landscape painter Pieter de Molijn valued a number of paintings. He may also have acted as an art dealer. In 1658 he sold a painting of the Virgin by Jacob van Campen for 300 guilders, and in 1663 he asked 700 guilders for a painting by Pieter van Laer from the French connoisseur Balthasar de Monconys. Saenredam was a successful painter. On 30-31 July 1658 he sold his famous portrayal of the old town hall of Amsterdam for 400 guilders to the city’s burgomasters (SK-C-1409). One of his interiors of the St Bavokerk in Haarlem was included in the Dutch Gift to the English Crown in 1660. Saenredam was buried in St Bavo’s in Haarlem on 31 May 1665.
Saenredam was the first artist to specialize in faithful depictions of actual churches. His early work consists of drawings and designs for prints, some of which were made for Samuel Ampzing’s Beschryvinge ende lof der stad Haerlem. One of those designs is a drawing of 1627 of the interior of St Bavo’s in Haarlem.5Haarlem, Gemeentearchief; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 60. His earliest dated painting is from 1628.6Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 63. From that year onwards, he confined himself to drawing and painting architecture, predominantly church interiors. He depicted churches in Haarlem, Utrecht and several other towns. Between 1629 and 1633 he made three landscape paintings with classical architecture after drawings by Maarten van Heemskerck. Towards the end of his career he painted several exterior views of churches and town halls. Some 60 paintings by Saenredam are known. Two of his pupils were Claes Cornelisz van Assendelft (in 1642) and Jacob van Campen’s nephew Claes Heerman (in 1651).
Gerdien Wuestman, 2007
References
Ampzing 1628, p. 372; Schrevelius 1648, p. 381; De Bie 1661, p. 246; Houbraken I, 1718, p. 174; Bredius IV, 1917, p. 1130; Swillens 1935, pp. 1-3, 53-56, 141-43; Miedema 1980, passim; Schwartz/Bok 1990, pp. 301-17 (documents); Liedtke in Turner 1996, pp. 507-11; Van Thiel-Stroman 2006, pp. 293-98
Entry
This subtly coloured painting is one of the high points in Saenredam’s oeuvre.7See Amsterdam 2004, p. 116, for the history of its critical reception. It shows the sober interior of the late-Gothic St Odulphuskerk in Assendelft, the village in the province of North Holland where Saenredam was born.8See Schwartz/Bok 1990, pp. 15-27, on Assendelft, and Vermeulen 1920, pp. 178-79, on the St Odulphuskerk. On the right is the tomb of the lords of Assendelft.9Schwartz/Bok 1990, pp. 15-16, 76. In the foreground, to the right of centre, is the tombstone of the engraver Jan Saenredam (c. 1565-1607), the artist’s father. That stone is the only surviving part of the church, which was demolished in 1852.10Assendelft, Oudheidkundige Kamer; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 95, fig. 104; see pp. 97-99 for the tombstone and other details.
Saenredam painted this church at least four times, the earliest work being dated 1634,11Present whereabouts unknown. This was probably the 1634 ‘Church sermon by Saenredam’ (‘Preek in de kerk van Saenredam’) that C. Hofstede de Groot assessed for the art dealer P. de Boer in 1928, about which he noted: ‘Exactly like the much later piece in Turin’ (‘Precies zoo als ’t veel latere stuk in Turijn’); RKD, Hofstede de Groot notes. That painting was probably identical with the painting auctioned the year before at the sale of the Marquess Curzon of Kedleston et al. (section Richard Waldie-Griffith, Bart.), London (Christie’s et al.), 22 December 1927, no. 62. and the last 1655.12Boston, Museum of Fine Arts; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 227, fig. 241. There is an undated work in Turin.13Galleria Sabauda; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 93, fig. 100. The views in St Odulphus’s are the only painted church interiors by Saenredam in which a service is being held.14A service is also taking place in a print of the interior of St Bavo’s by Jan van de Velde after a design by Saenredam; see Hollstein XXXIII, 1989, p. 137, no. 426; illustrated in Hollstein XXXIV, 1989, p. 228. See Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 98, for speculation about the preacher’s identity.
Like so many of Saenredam’s paintings, this work of 1649 went through a long gestation period. The artist used a construction drawing made six years earlier (fig. a),15Swillens in Utrecht 1961, pp. 64-65, no. 21. which in turn was based on a preliminary study made nine years before that (fig. b).16Swillens in Utrecht 1961, p. 64, no. 20; for the preliminary study see also Schapelhouman in coll. cat. Amsterdam 1979, pp. 112-13. The construction drawing was transferred to the ground of the panel by indentation.
Along the lower edge of the tomb there is an almost illegible inscription in which Saenredam described the subject of the painting and added his signature and the date. He himself overpainted this inscription, which is almost identical to the one on the pew on the left. He may have decided to move it in order to spread the inscriptions more evenly over the composition.
Several authors have noted that Saenredam toned down some of the Gothic details seen in the preliminary study.17Vermeulen 1920, pp. 184-86; Liedtke 1975, p. 146, note 8; Keyl 1986, p. 55, note 6. The lancet arches in the drawing, for instance, have become round-headed in the painting. Vermeulen, who demonstrated that the St Odulphuskerk was largely rebuilt between 1642 and 1644, suggested that these modifications may have been the result of structural changes.18Vermeulen 1920, p. 186. However, Liedtke’s hypothesis that alterations of this kind by Saenredam were prompted by his preference for classicist architecture is more plausible.19Liedtke 1975, p. 146, note 8. See De Jongh 1973 for the way in which Gothic architecture was appreciated in the 17th century.
There is reason to believe that one of the interiors of St Odulphus’s was not intended for sale. Saenredam’s grandson Pieter Vermeulen owned two of his paintings, one of which was of the church in Assendelft, which he bequeathed to his nephew Pieter van Dielen on 17 December 1718.20Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 310. The tentative suggestion made by Schwartz and Bok that this was the painting now in the Rijksmuseum is very tempting, given the prominence of the tombstone.21See Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 99. The stone is missing in the other known versions.
The figures in the painting in Turin mentioned above are traditionally attributed to Saenredam’s fellow townsman Adriaen van Ostade, and several authors have also associated the staffage in the Rijksmuseum work with Van Ostade.22Coll. cat. 1887, p. 149; coll. cat. 1960, p. 274; Swillens 1935, p. 53; Martin I, 1935, p. 281; Gudlaugsson 1954, p. 66, note 14. However, there can be no doubt that Saenredam painted them himself, as Plietzsch and Giltaij have already pointed out.23Plietzsch 1960, p. 122; Giltaij in Rotterdam 1991, p. 113. The brushstrokes of the top layer of paint in the background definitely go around the outlines of the figures. This is most clearly visible in the vicinity of the standing preacher. One striking feature of Saenredam’s figures, apart from their rather sketchy nature and the dark colours, is the almost complete absence of cast shadows.24See also the figures in SK-A-1189.
Gerdien Wuestman, 2007
See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements
This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 262.
Literature
Swillens in Utrecht 1961, pp. 62-63, no. 19; Schwartz/Bok 1990, pp. 76, 98-99, 255, no. 19; Giltaij in Rotterdam 1991, pp. 113-15, no. 16; Amsterdam 2004, p. 116; Pollmer 2004, p. 172, no. 154, with earlier literature
Collection catalogues
1885, p. 100, no. 130; 1887, p. 149, no. 1261 (figures by Adriaen van Ostade); 1903, p. 235, no. 2100; 1934, p. 254, no. 2100; 1960, p. 274, no. 2100 (figures possibly by Adriaen van Ostade); 1976, p. 492, no. C 217; 2007, no. 262
Citation
G. Wuestman, 2007, 'Pieter Jansz. Saenredam, Interior of the St Odulphuskerk in Assendelft, Seen from the Choir to the West, 1649-10-02', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.5351
(accessed 30 April 2025 14:07:07).Figures
fig. a Pieter Saenredam, Interior of the St Odulphuskerk in Assendelft, Seen from the Choir to the West, 1643. Graphite and pen in brown, 754 x 530 mm. Zeist, Rijksdienst voor Archeologie, Cultuurlandschap en Monumenten. Photo: Amersfoort, Cultural Heritage Agency / TH-293
fig. b Pieter Saenredam, Interior of the St Odulphuskerk in Assendelft, Seen from the Choir to the West, 1634. Pen in brown, black chalk, heightened in yellow, pink and white, on blue paper, 244 x 418 mm. Amsterdams Historisch Museum. Photo: Amsterdam, Amsterdam Museum
Footnotes
- 1Copy RKD.
- 2Van der Hoop Lijst, p. 38, no. 235: ‘Van den Heer J:o de Vries overgenomen eene voorstelling van de kerk te Assendelft, door P. Saenredam; en is dit Schilderij geteekend door hem, met het jaartel 1649, zijnde zeer helder en fijn uitgewerkt; voor de Som van ... 600’.
- 3Van der Hoop Taxatie 1854, p. 2, no. 235: ‘Gezigt in de kerk te Assendelft, fl. 100’.
- 4Provenance reconstructed in Pollmer 2004, p. 172, no. 154.
- 5Haarlem, Gemeentearchief; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 60.
- 6Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 63.
- 7See Amsterdam 2004, p. 116, for the history of its critical reception.
- 8See Schwartz/Bok 1990, pp. 15-27, on Assendelft, and Vermeulen 1920, pp. 178-79, on the St Odulphuskerk.
- 9Schwartz/Bok 1990, pp. 15-16, 76.
- 10Assendelft, Oudheidkundige Kamer; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 95, fig. 104; see pp. 97-99 for the tombstone and other details.
- 11Present whereabouts unknown. This was probably the 1634 ‘Church sermon by Saenredam’ (‘Preek in de kerk van Saenredam’) that C. Hofstede de Groot assessed for the art dealer P. de Boer in 1928, about which he noted: ‘Exactly like the much later piece in Turin’ (‘Precies zoo als ’t veel latere stuk in Turijn’); RKD, Hofstede de Groot notes. That painting was probably identical with the painting auctioned the year before at the sale of the Marquess Curzon of Kedleston et al. (section Richard Waldie-Griffith, Bart.), London (Christie’s et al.), 22 December 1927, no. 62.
- 12Boston, Museum of Fine Arts; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 227, fig. 241.
- 13Galleria Sabauda; illustrated in Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 93, fig. 100.
- 14A service is also taking place in a print of the interior of St Bavo’s by Jan van de Velde after a design by Saenredam; see Hollstein XXXIII, 1989, p. 137, no. 426; illustrated in Hollstein XXXIV, 1989, p. 228. See Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 98, for speculation about the preacher’s identity.
- 15Swillens in Utrecht 1961, pp. 64-65, no. 21.
- 16Swillens in Utrecht 1961, p. 64, no. 20; for the preliminary study see also Schapelhouman in coll. cat. Amsterdam 1979, pp. 112-13.
- 17Vermeulen 1920, pp. 184-86; Liedtke 1975, p. 146, note 8; Keyl 1986, p. 55, note 6.
- 18Vermeulen 1920, p. 186.
- 19Liedtke 1975, p. 146, note 8. See De Jongh 1973 for the way in which Gothic architecture was appreciated in the 17th century.
- 20Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 310.
- 21See Schwartz/Bok 1990, p. 99.
- 22Coll. cat. 1887, p. 149; coll. cat. 1960, p. 274; Swillens 1935, p. 53; Martin I, 1935, p. 281; Gudlaugsson 1954, p. 66, note 14.
- 23Plietzsch 1960, p. 122; Giltaij in Rotterdam 1991, p. 113.
- 24See also the figures in SK-A-1189.