Gerard van Honthorst

Merry Violinist with Wineglass

1623

Inscriptions

  • signature and date, bottom centre, on the balustrade (G and H ligated):GHonthorst. ƒe. 1623.

Technical notes

The support is a plain-weave canvas. Slight cusping on all sides indicates that the dimensions have not been altered, at least not significantly. The canvas is lined. The ground layer is not visible. The paint was applied with relatively broad, distinct brushstrokes, especially visible in the figure’s face, the feathers of the beret and highlights on the doublet. Lines have been incised with the butt end of a brush in the curtain, perhaps as a rudimentary guide, although they often do not correspond to the pattern. Similar incised lines are to be found in the violin. An incised line in the central highlight of the figure’s right sleeve, near the cuff, enhances the plasticity of the fold.


Scientific examination and reports

  • technical report: L. Sozzani, RMA, 8 mei 2002

Condition

Good. The varnish has discoloured somewhat and is matte in places.


Conservation

  • W.A. Hopman, 1874: canvas lined
  • H.H. Mertens, 1937: canvas relined
  • C.H. Jenner, 1937: canvas relined

Provenance

...; ? collection Johann Georg Eimbke (1714-93), Berlin, 1761 (‘Ein soldat. Bruststück Lebensgröße auf Leinewand gemahlt, 3 Fuß hoch und 2 Fuß 4 Zoll breit [94 x 62.8 cm]. Er hat in der rechten Hand ein Glaß, und in der andern eine Violine [...] das vergnügte Lachen im Gesichte ist natürlich und gut ausgedruckt.’);1Coll. cat. Eimbke 1761, no. 18. his sale, Berlin (auction house not known), 18 May 1764, no. 18 (description same as above), 23.4 Reichsthaler, to Christian Christoph Engel;2Copy EBNP....; sale, Jacobus Viet (The Hague), Amsterdam (J. Posthumus et al.), 12 October 1774, no. 106 (‘Een vrolyke Gast; op Doek, h. 40 b. 34 duim [102.8 x 87.4 cm]. Deeze vertoond zich, levensgroote, kykende uit een Venster, hebbende in zyn eene hand een Rynse Wynroemer en in de andere een Viool’), fl. 6.15;3Copy EBNP....; sale, Maria Magdalena van Sluypwijk (1710-1802), Gravin van Moens, Amsterdam (P. van der Schley et al.), 20 April 1803, no. 32 (‘Voor een Open Vengster, staat een vrolyke Muzikant, houdende een Fiool en Strykstok in de eene, en een Roemer met Wyn in de andere hand, hy is gekleed in aloude Spaansche kleeding, omhoog en ter zyde hangteen Tapytkleed [...] doek, hoog 42, breed 34 duim [108 x 87.4 cm]’), fl. 500, to the dealer Christian Josi, Amsterdam and London;4Copy RKD....; sale, Van Terburg family, Amsterdam (C.S. Roos et al.), 16 July 1819, no. 74 (‘Een vrolijke Gast op zijn Spaansch gekleed, met een fiool in de eene, en eene roemer wijn in de andere hand, op D., h. 41, br. 34 d. [105.4 x 87.4 cm]’), fl. 100, to the dealer Jeronimo de Vries, Amsterdam;5Copy RKD....; from the dealer Christian Josi, to the museum, fl. 600, 18246RANH, ARM, Kop, inv. 36, p. 155 (12 July 1824); RANH ARM, IS, inv. 11, no. 88, (5 August 1824, no. 8); RANH, ARM, Kop, inv. 36, p. 159 (7 December 1824).

ObjectNumber: SK-A-180


The artist

Biography

Gerard van Honthorst (Utrecht 1592 - Utrecht 1656)

Gerard van Honthorst was born in Utrecht on 4 November 1592 into a family of artists. His father, Herman Gerritsz van Honthorst, was a decorative painter and probably his first teacher. According to Von Sandrart and Houbraken, Honthorst trained with Abraham Bloemaert. When exactly he went to Italy is not known; a drawn copy after Caravaggio’s Martyrdom of St Peter in the Church of Santa Maria del Popolo is dated 1616,7Oslo, National Gallery, Printroom; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 395. indicating that he was in Rome by that year. His first documented painting, The Beheading of St John the Baptist, was executed for the Church of Santa Maria della Scala in 1617-18.8Illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 16. Such Caravaggesque night scenes, which often include artificial sources of illumination, garnered Honthorst the nickname ‘Gherardo delle Notti’ in Italy. Among his Roman patrons were the Marchese Vincenzo Giustiniani, in whose house Honthorst lived, and Cardinal Scipione Borghese.

A few months after his return to Utrecht in 1620, Honthorst married Sophia Coopmans. He joined the Guild of St Luke there and set up his own workshop. Von Sandrart, one of his apprentices in the 1620s, informs us that Honthorst had as many as 25 pupils at a time, from each of whom he received the sizable tuition fee of 100 guilders a year. With the exception of 1627, Honthorst served as dean of the guild between 1625 and 1630. It was also in the mid-1620s that he received his first commission from the court of Frederik Hendrik in The Hague.9Amalia van Solms and her Sister Louise Christina of Solms-Braunfels as Diana and a Hunting Nymph, present whereabouts unknown; see Judson/Ekkart 1999, pp. 235-36, no. 297. A commission from the British ambassador in The Hague, Sir Dudley Carleton, for Lord Arundel came as early as 162010Aeneas Fleeing from the Sack of Troy, present whereabouts unknown; see Judson/Ekkart 1999, p. 106, no. 89. and eventually led to the invitation from Charles I to work on Banqueting House in Whitehall in 1628.11King Charles I of England and his Wife Queen Henrietta Maria as Apollo and Diana, Hampton Court Palace; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 45. Honthorst returned to the United Provinces the same year, but continued to work for the English court in the years to come. In 1630 he became court painter to the exiled King and Queen of Bohemia, Frederick V and Elizabeth, in The Hague. Honthorst also painted numerous portraits of the Stadholder and his wife, Amalia van Solms, and took part in the decoration of, among others, the palaces Honselaarsdijk, Huis ter Nieuburch (1636-39) and Huis ten Bosch (1649-50). In order to accommodate his work in The Hague, he set up a second workshop there in 1637 and joined the guild, serving as dean in 1640. Also in 1637, he became the principal artist to decorate the Banqueting Hall in Kronborg Castle for King Christian IV of Denmark. Honthorst was, perhaps, the most internationally successful Dutch artist of his time. Despite, or possibly as a result of this success, his late style was criticized as ‘stiff ’ and ‘slick’ (‘stijve gladdicheyt’) and he was esteemed a ‘much less great master than themselves’ (‘beaucoup moins grand maistre qu’eux’) by his fellow artists working on the Oranjezaal.12Van Hoogstraeten 1678, p. 234; Braun 1966, p. 57, doc. 87, 1649 letter from Constantijn Huygens to Amalia van Solms. He died on 27 April 1656 and was buried in the Catharijnekerk in Utrecht.

Jonathan Bikker, 2007

References
Mancini c. 1620, fol. 86 (Judson/Ekkart 1999, p. 47); Von Sandrart 1675 (1925), pp. 22, 102, 172-74; Houbraken I, 1718, pp. 149-50; Braun 1966, pp. 7-59, 340-88 (documents); Bok in Utrecht-Braunschweig 1986, pp. 276-79; Bok in San Francisco etc. 1997, pp. 382-83; Judson/Ekkart 1999, pp. XXXIII-XXXIV, 1-24


Entry

The earliest dated half-length single-figure musicians in the northern Netherlands were produced by Dirck van Baburen, Hendrick ter Brugghen and Abraham Bloemaert in 1621, and the type quickly became a popular one. Often lyrical in mood, these works have their origins in the mostly pastoral single-figure musicians of 16th-century north Italian artists like Savoldo and artists in the circles of Giorgione and Jacopo Bassano. Perhaps significant for Honthorst’s interest in the genre were the two musicians described as ‘Buffoni’ and attributed to Giorgione in the collection of Honthorst’s Roman patron, Cardinal Scipione Borghese.13For these paintings and their provenance see Herrmann Fiore in Rome-Siena 2000, pp. 130-33, nos. 11, 12 (ill.). The present painting, and one in Schwerin of a Singing Elder with a Flute (fig. a), are the earliest dated examples from Honthorst’s hand. The exuberant, laughing musician bursting into the viewer’s space from behind a window or balustrade in the Amsterdam painting differs dramatically from the often quiet, poetic mood of especially Ter Brugghen’s musicians, as well as Caravaggio’s only single-figure musician, the Lute Player in St Petersburg.14Hermitage. The diagonal placement of Honthorst’s figure, the broad brushstrokes, especially in the costume, and the seemingly quivering hair and feathers, as well as the highlights on the hand, shoulder and face, add to the vivacity of this violinist.

Manfredi’s Drinker in Modena has been seen as a direct model for Honthorst’s painting, as both figures are possessed of a joyful attitude (fig. b).15See, for example, Judson/Ekkart 1999, p. 190. A painting such as Baburen’s 1622 Lute Player in Utrecht,16Centraal Museum; illustrated in Slatkes 1965, fig. 31. with its foreshortened lute and closely cropped figure, might have inspired Honthorst to create the first truly trompe l’oeil version of the single-figure musician. A year prior to his Rijksmuseum work, Honthorst painted a di sotto in su ceiling, possibly for his own house, showing merry music-making figures gathered around a balustrade.17Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 171. A number of other scenes of joyful musicians set behind trompe l’oeil balustrades followed in 162318For example the painting in Lyon, Musée des Beaux-Arts; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 170. and 1624.19For example the painting in Paris, Louvre; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 159. Although he was perhaps spurred on by the single-figure musicians created by other Utrecht artists, Honthorst’s innovative approach is consistent with his own artistic preoccupations at the time.

Attempts to identify the figure in Honthorst’s painting as a Rederijkersnar, the fool in the Dutch variant of the Commedia dell’arte, or as Peeckelhaering, a figure in popular Dutch theatre whose insatiable appetite for herring led to an equally insatiable thirst, have been based on the assumption that the figure is dressed in ‘late Burgundian theatrical costume’.20Gudlaugsson 1938, p. 68; Judson 1959, p. 65; Braun 1966, p. 18, no. 49. The striped doublet and feathered beret, however, were more likely based on the costume of Caravaggio and Manfredi’s bravi.21Brown in Philadelphia etc. 1984, p. 212. The hypothesis has also been advanced that the present painting represented Taste (and, as such, had a vanitas function) in a series of the five senses which included the Singing Elder with a Flute in Schwerin (Hearing) and three other, now supposedly lost, compositions.22Judson/Ekkart 1999, pp. 190-91. The most persuasive argument against this hypothesis is that the violin held by the figure in the present painting represents Hearing, and therefore would overlap with the sense represented in the Schwerin painting had they indeed been part of a series of the five senses.23See Brown in Philadelphia etc. 1984, p. 212. Nor is another, similar hypothesis advanced by some scholars, that the Amsterdam and Schwerin paintings were conceived as pendants, thoroughly convincing.24Judson (1959, p. 233), Braun (1966, p. 180) and Vermeer (in Utrecht-Braunschweig 1986, p. 291) consider these works to be pendants. This theory, however, is rejected by Moiso-Diekamp 1987, p. 346, no. B2. Indeed, in both paintings the figure is seen from below and placed behind a trompe l’oeil balustrade. The dimensions of both works are also similar, especially if one allows for the possibility that the Schwerin painting might have been cut down on the left. The lighting, which comes from the left, is also consistent in both paintings. The figures, however, have different relationships to their settings, as the singing man leans back while the violinist leans forward, producing a disjointed effect when the two works are placed side by side.

Jonathan Bikker, 2007

See Bibliography and Rijksmuseum painting catalogues
See Key to abbreviations and Acknowledgements

This entry was published in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, I: Artists Born between 1570 and 1600, coll. cat. Amsterdam 2007, no. 135.


Literature

Judson/Ekkart 1999, pp. 190-91, no. 241, with earlier literature; Macioce in Rome-Siena 2000, pp. 212-14, no. 47


Collection catalogues

1832, p. 35, no. 142; 1843, p. 31, no. 142 (‘in good condition’); 1858, p. 93, no. 183; 1880, p. 150, no. 153; 1887, p. 79, no. 669; 1903, p. 132, no. 1233; 1934, p. 134, no. 1233; 1960, p. 142, no. 1233; 1976, p. 285, no. A 180; 2007, no. 135


Citation

J. Bikker, 2007, 'Gerard van Honthorst, Merry Violinist with Wineglass, 1623', in J. Bikker (ed.), Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.8762

(accessed 9 May 2025 17:35:20).

Figures

  • fig. a Gerard van Honthorst, Singing Elder with a Flute, 1623. Oil on canvas, 107.5 x 85.5 cm. Schwerin, Staatliches Museum Schwerin. Photo: bpk / Staatliche Schlösser, Gärten und Kunstsammlungen Mecklenburg-Vorpommern / Elke Walford

  • fig. b Bartolomeo Manfredi, The Drinker. Oil on canvas, 130 x 93 cm. Modena, Galleria Estense, inv. no. 15. Photo: 1990 Scala, Florence / courtesy of the Ministero Beni e Att. Culturali


Footnotes

  • 1Coll. cat. Eimbke 1761, no. 18.
  • 2Copy EBNP.
  • 3Copy EBNP.
  • 4Copy RKD.
  • 5Copy RKD.
  • 6RANH, ARM, Kop, inv. 36, p. 155 (12 July 1824); RANH ARM, IS, inv. 11, no. 88, (5 August 1824, no. 8); RANH, ARM, Kop, inv. 36, p. 159 (7 December 1824).
  • 7Oslo, National Gallery, Printroom; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 395.
  • 8Illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 16.
  • 9Amalia van Solms and her Sister Louise Christina of Solms-Braunfels as Diana and a Hunting Nymph, present whereabouts unknown; see Judson/Ekkart 1999, pp. 235-36, no. 297.
  • 10Aeneas Fleeing from the Sack of Troy, present whereabouts unknown; see Judson/Ekkart 1999, p. 106, no. 89.
  • 11King Charles I of England and his Wife Queen Henrietta Maria as Apollo and Diana, Hampton Court Palace; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 45.
  • 12Van Hoogstraeten 1678, p. 234; Braun 1966, p. 57, doc. 87, 1649 letter from Constantijn Huygens to Amalia van Solms.
  • 13For these paintings and their provenance see Herrmann Fiore in Rome-Siena 2000, pp. 130-33, nos. 11, 12 (ill.).
  • 14Hermitage.
  • 15See, for example, Judson/Ekkart 1999, p. 190.
  • 16Centraal Museum; illustrated in Slatkes 1965, fig. 31.
  • 17Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 171.
  • 18For example the painting in Lyon, Musée des Beaux-Arts; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 170.
  • 19For example the painting in Paris, Louvre; illustrated in Judson/Ekkart 1999, pl. 159.
  • 20Gudlaugsson 1938, p. 68; Judson 1959, p. 65; Braun 1966, p. 18, no. 49.
  • 21Brown in Philadelphia etc. 1984, p. 212.
  • 22Judson/Ekkart 1999, pp. 190-91.
  • 23See Brown in Philadelphia etc. 1984, p. 212.
  • 24Judson (1959, p. 233), Braun (1966, p. 180) and Vermeer (in Utrecht-Braunschweig 1986, p. 291) consider these works to be pendants. This theory, however, is rejected by Moiso-Diekamp 1987, p. 346, no. B2.