Master of Koudewater (follower of)

Archangel Gabriel, from an Annunciation

Northern Brabant, Lower Rhine region, 1470 - 1490

Technical notes

Carved and originally polychromed. Every side is completely worked. Mortises on the reverse were used to secure the separately carved wings (now missing).


Condition

The right hand, the wings, a piece of the nose and parts of the base are missing. The polychromy has been removed, with only several traces remaining.


Provenance

? Commissioned by the Bridgettine abbey Mariënwater, Koudewater, near Rosmalen, c. 1470;1For the history of these abbeys and the transitional period and transfer of the art patrimony, see L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, pp. 39-57, 62-64, 97. or commissioned by the Bridgettine abbey Marienbaum, near Xanten;2Ibid. transferred to the Bridgettine convent Maria Refugie, Uden, 1713-24 or 1802 respectively;3Ibid. from where, with numerous other sculptures (BK-NM-1195 to -1243), fl. 2,000 for all, to the Nederlandsch Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, The Hague, 1875; transferred to the museum, 1885; on loan to the Museum Krona (formerly known as the Museum voor Religieuze Kunst), Uden, inv. no. 0020, since 1973

ObjectNumber: BK-NM-1208


The artist

Biography

Master of Koudewater (active in northern Brabant c. 1460-80)

The name of convenience ‘Master of Koudewater’ was introduced by Leeuwenberg in 1958 to define the production of a sculptor active in the period 1460-80, whose oeuvre chiefly comprises carved wooden statues of saints formerly originating from two Bridgettine abbeys. The first one, Mariënwater, was located in the northern Brabantine village of Koudewater. In 1460, this ‘mother abbey’ founded a second abbey in the vicinity of Cleves, called Marienbaum. When evicted from their abbey in 1713, the Bridgettine nuns at Mariënwater moved to a convent in the vicinity of Uden, together with all of their possessions. In 1802, when the abbey at Marienbaum was dissolved, a portion of its inventory was likewise transferred to Uden. Facing financial difficulty, the Bridgettine nuns at Uden were ultimately forced to sell off the bulk of their art holdings. In 1875, a large number of saintly statues carved by the Master of Koudewater and followers of his style were subsequently acquired en bloc by the Museum voor Geschiedenis en Kunst, a forerunner of the Rijksmuseum.

There are strong indications that the Master of Koudewater produced statues for both Mariënwater and Marienbaum. Collectively, these works – together with other similar figures produced in the northern part of the Duchy of Brabant – are today known as the ‘Koudewater Group’. The Rijksmuseum holds sixteen of the Koudewater statues in its collection. Based on the shared static but elegant poses, calm facial expressions, and matching drapery schemes characterized by deeply cut folds, however, only six of these works can be securely attributed to the master himself. The remaining ten are likely to have been produced by workshop assistants, pupils or followers of the master’s style.

The centre of the Master of Koudewater’s activity was initially thought to be in the Lower Rhine region. When acknowledging the documented provenance of the works and the stylistic similarity to Brabantine sculpture, however, the northern part of the Duchy of Brabant emerges as the most likely area of production. Attempts have been made to link the master’s carving to the flourishing artistic climate in Den Bosch and even to a documented woodcarver active there, Jan Jansz van Gheervliet.4G.C.M. van Dijck, ‘De meester van Coudewater opgespoord? Een interessante theorie’, Bossche bladen 3 (2001), pp. 75-77. Nevertheless, nothing in the Master of Koudewater’s oeuvre suggests a knowledge of the artistic innovation occurring in this northern Brabantine city. On the contrary, it appears he led a rather solitary life. His artistic origin must therefore be sought in monastic surroundings in or near Mariënwater.

Marie Mundigler, 2024

References
G.C.M. van Dijck, ‘De meester van Coudewater opgespoord? Een interessante theorie’, Bossche bladen 3 (2001), pp. 75-77; J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, pp. 86-94; L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, pp. 61-64; J. Leeuwenberg in R. van Luttervelt et al., Middeleeuwse kunst der Noordelijke Nederlanden, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1958, pp. 192-93; G. Lemmens and G. de Werd, Beelden uit Brabant: Laatgotische kunst uit het oude hertogdom 1400-1520, exh. cat. Den Bosch (Noordbrabants Museum) 1971, pp. 17-26; J.W. Steyaert et al., Late Gothic Sculpture: The Burgundian Netherlands, exh. cat. Ghent (Museum of Fine Arts) 1994, n. 84; W. Vogelsang, De oude kerkelijke kunst in Nederland: Gedenkboek van de Nationale Tentoonstelling te ’s-Hertogenbosch in 1913, Den Bosch 1914, p. 98


Entry

Together with a figure of the Virgin Mary, this sculpture of the archangel Gabriel once belonged to an Annunciation group. Even without wings, now lost, this messenger of glad tidings – depicted with his knees bent – appears to have descended from the sky. Gabriel is dressed in liturgical vestments: an amice, an alb gathered about the waist and a stole that crosses at the breast. Over all of this he wears a cope, closed with a quatrefoil-shaped clasp. Adorning the archangel’s head is an ornamental band with a gemstone. In his raised left hand, he holds a banderole that unravels at his feet, invariably bearing the inscription of Gabriel’s salutary greeting to the Virgin: Ave gratia plena.

Leeuwenberg situated the sculpture in the eastern Netherlands. De Werd and Van Liebergen, by contrast, observed ties to artistic production in the northern part of the Duchy of Brabant. Their conclusion was based on the physiognomic type, e.g. the angel’s bulging eyes, the long, narrow nose, the somewhat protruding chin, and the hair that fans outward in the area of the temples – all highly reminiscent of the physiognomic traits found on statues of saints attributed to the Master of Koudewater (active c. 14760-c. 1480).5G. Lemmens and G. de Werd, Beelden uit Brabant: Laatgotische kunst uit het oude hertogdom 1400-1520, exh. cat. Den Bosch (Noordbrabants Museum) 1971, no. 53; L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, no. 25. This anonymous master owes his name of convenience to the fact that most of his saintly statues come from the convent of Mariënwater in Koudewater in the northern part of the Duchy of Brabant, dissolved in 1713.6J. Leeuwenberg in R. van Luttervelt et al., Middeleeuwse kunst der Noordelijke Nederlanden, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1958, pp. 192-93. In 1875 the museum acquired the master’s three core pieces – together with a large number of stylistically related statues of saints – from this convent’s direct successor, the convent of Maria Refugie in Uden. Among these acquired works was the present Archangel Gabriel. There are strong indications that the Master of Koudewater also produced several statues for Marienbaum, a abbey founded in the vicinity of Cleves in 1460 by the mother house in Koudewater. With the dissolution of this abbey in 1802, a portion of its art possessions were subsequently transferred to Uden, thus clarifying why certain saints were overrepresented there in the nineteenth century.7L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, pp. 61-63, 97. Additional research can perhaps shed new light on the precise provenance of individual statues.

While the sculpture is generally interpreted as the work of a follower of the Master of Koudewater, correspondingly dated circa 1470-80, Steyaert has suggested this work may in fact be one of the earliest works in the Koudewater group, just as a Female Saint in the museum’s collection (BK-NM-1210). In his estimation, this is most certainly true of what he sees as a related sculpture of a Female Saint in the Museum Vleeshuis (Antwerp), which he dates as circa 1450-60 on the basis of its similarity to Utrecht sculpture.8Antwerp, Museum Vleeshuis, inv. no. AV 5501, see J.W. Steyaert et al., Late Gothic Sculpture: The Burgundian Netherlands, exh. cat. Ghent (Museum of Fine Arts) 1994, no. 84. Nevertheless, Gabriel’s bent knees and the draping of the cope upward and over the shoulder are details more commonly encountered in Lower Rhenish examples, such as the Angel with the Arma Christi in the museum’s collection, attributed to Master Arnt of Kalkar (BK-16383). For this reason, and in light of its provenance, this sculpture may very well have been carved for the abbey Marienbaum by a Lower Rhenish follower of the Master of Koudewater, only to eventually end up in the convent in Uden.

Bieke van der Mark, 2024


Literature

J. Leeuwenberg with the assistance of W. Halsema-Kubes, Beeldhouwkunst in het Rijksmuseum, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1973, no. 109, with earlier literature; L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Birgitta van Zweden, 1303-1373: 600 jaar kunst en cultuur van haar kloosterorde, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1986, no. 89; J.W. Steyaert et al., Late Gothic Sculpture: The Burgundian Netherlands, exh. cat. Ghent (Museum of Fine Arts) 1994, p. 296; L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, no. 25


Citation

B. van der Mark, 2024, 'follower of Meester van Koudewater, Archangel Gabriel, from an Annunciation, Northern Brabant, 1470 - 1490', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.24384

(accessed 29 May 2025 12:38:27).

Footnotes

  • 1For the history of these abbeys and the transitional period and transfer of the art patrimony, see L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, pp. 39-57, 62-64, 97.
  • 2Ibid.
  • 3Ibid.
  • 4G.C.M. van Dijck, ‘De meester van Coudewater opgespoord? Een interessante theorie’, Bossche bladen 3 (2001), pp. 75-77.
  • 5G. Lemmens and G. de Werd, Beelden uit Brabant: Laatgotische kunst uit het oude hertogdom 1400-1520, exh. cat. Den Bosch (Noordbrabants Museum) 1971, no. 53; L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, no. 25.
  • 6J. Leeuwenberg in R. van Luttervelt et al., Middeleeuwse kunst der Noordelijke Nederlanden, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksmuseum) 1958, pp. 192-93.
  • 7L.C.B.M. van Liebergen, Beelden in de abdij: Middeleeuwse kunst uit het noordelijk deel van het hertogdom Brabant, exh. cat. Uden (Museum voor Religieuze Kunst) 1999, pp. 61-63, 97. Additional research can perhaps shed new light on the precise provenance of individual statues.
  • 8Antwerp, Museum Vleeshuis, inv. no. AV 5501, see J.W. Steyaert et al., Late Gothic Sculpture: The Burgundian Netherlands, exh. cat. Ghent (Museum of Fine Arts) 1994, no. 84.