Virgin and Child

anonymous, c. 1460 - c. 1480

Until a few decades ago it was not known that ivory statuettes had ever been carved in the Low Countries. Since then, quite a few have surfaced, their shape and style betraying their origins in these regions. The floral wreath in the Virgin’s hair is one such characteristic Netherlandish motif. This statuette probably stood in a small domestic altar.

  • Artwork typefigure
  • Object numberBK-2011-24
  • Dimensionsheight 11.5 cm
  • Physical characteristicsivory

anonymous

Virgin and Child

Northern Netherlands, ? Utrecht, c. 1460 - c. 1480

Inscriptions

  • inscription, on an old label on the Virgin’s back, in brown ink:Andencken für […] // Celenniu lonis […] z […] // P Fürstin in Colon(n)a Fraü z […] //. anno .:[...] im. fir annula[…] 9 // 1786

Technical notes

Carved and perhaps originally polychromed in areas.


Condition

The statuette is in perfect condition. No traces of polychromy can be discerned. The figure stands on a modern (19th- or 20th-century) profiled wooden socle.


Provenance

…; collection Professor Dr H.O. Goldschmidt (1920-2009), Eindhoven, date unknown; donated to the museum by his heirs, Mr H. Goldschmidt, Tilburg and Mrs M.A.B. Goldschmidt, Wassenaar, in lieu of inheritance tax, 2011

Object number: BK-2011-24

Credit line: Gift of the Goldschmidt-Pol Collection


Entry

Not until 1994 was it learned that ivory carvings had been produced in the Low Countries during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, thanks to research conducted by the art historian Richard Randall.1R.H. Randall, ‘Dutch Ivories of the Fifteenth Century’, Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 45 (1994), pp. 126-39. Randall’s pioneering work demonstrated stylistic links between a group of ivories having a previously undetermined origin and fifteenth century Netherlandish book illumination and engraved metalwork. From this time forward, ivories preserved in international museum collections around the world could be identified as belonging to the same group. By contrast, very few representative examples of this Netherlandish ivory-carving are held in Dutch museum collections.2See F. Scholten, ‘Een Nederlandse ivoren pax uit de Late Middeleeuwen’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 52 (2004), pp. 2-23; I. Reesing, ‘From Ivory to Pipeclay: The Reproduction of Late Medieval Sculpture in the Low Countries’, in E.M. Kavaler, F. Scholten and J. Woodall (eds.), Netherlandish Sculpture of the 16th Century (Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art/Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 67), Leiden/Boston 2017, pp. 256-85. One exception is a small statuette of the Virgin and Child preserved in the Museum Catharijneconvent, which, on the basis of the treatment of the drapery folds and facial type, falls perfectly in line with the Netherlandish sculptural tradition of large wooden statues.3Utrecht, Museum Catharijneconvent, (inv. no. ABM bi765), see R. Koekkoek, Gotische ivoren in het Catharijneconvent, coll. cat. Utrecht 1987, no. 16.

In addition to a number of ivory reliefs, Randall also wrote about a statuette of a standing Virgin and Child (fig. a) in Williamstown (Mass.), a work freely carved in the round, which on the basis of stylistic consideration he convincingly described as a Netherlandish work, dated circa 1460-75.4Williamstown (Mass.), Williams College Museum of Art, gift of John Davis Hatch, inv. no. 78.2.4, see R.H. Randall, ‘Dutch Ivories of the Fifteenth Century’, Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 45 (1994), pp. 126-39, esp. p. 138 and fig. 10. Remarkably, this small ivory is virtually identical to the present statuette preserved in the Rijksmuseum. Both figures are of the same height, stand on identical round bases ornamented with Tremolierung, with the same pose, the same schematic drapery folds, as well as similar details in the attire, identical facial types and hair, and finally, the same distinctive wreath of large flowers encircling the crown of the head. Unlike the American statuette, however, no remnants or traces of polychromy and gilding can be observed on the present piece. To this pair a third ivory Virgin and Child must be added, today held in the Wyvern Collection in London.5London, The Wyvern Collection, inv. no. 0852, see P. Williamson, Medieval and Later Ivory Carvings and Small Sculpture: The Wyvern Collection, coll. cat. London 2019, no. 154 (as ‘Netherlands, possibly Utrecht, c. 1460-80’). Despite the obvious similarity in composition and size (height 11.8 cm), the facial type is different and the encircling flower wreath is missing from the head. Noteworthy is that this statuette, like the Rijksmuseum piece, also comes from the Professor Henny Goldschmidt collection in Eindhoven. All three statuettes probably originate from the same studio. Also in the Wyvern Collection is a somewhat smaller ivory carving of St Catherine of Alexandria, a work so similar to the three aforementioned Madonnas that one can only surmise it too came from the same workshop.6London, The Wyvern Collection, inv. no. 0786, see P. Williamson, Medieval and Later Ivory Carvings and Small Sculpture: The Wyvern Collection, coll. cat. London 2019, no. 151 (as ‘Netherlands, probably Utrecht, c. 1450-70’). A radiocarbon test of the Catherine’s ivory indicated a dating for the raw material of 1408-31 (with a 68% probability). The Rijksmuseum Madonna and her two equivalents all follow a compositional scheme characteristic of Marian figures produced in the Low Countries in the second half of the fifteenth century.7Cf. Utrecht, Museum Catharijneconvent, inv. no. ABM bh322M, see M. van Vlierden et al., Hout- en steensculptuur van Museum Catharijneconvent, ca. 1200-ca. 1600, coll. cat Utrecht 2004, pp. 242-43. Notably, the treatment of the drapery folds and the charming facial features recall those of the Mary Magdalene and St Agnes from Utrecht Cathedral, figures once possibly originally adorning the choir screen in the church. Dated circa 1450, these Cathedral statuettes have previously been linked to the sculptor Jan Ude (active 1446-94).8M. Leeflang et al., Middeleeuwse beelden uit Utrecht 1430-1530/Mittelalterliche Bildwerke aus Utrecht, exh. cat. Utrecht (Museum Catharijneconvent)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2012-13, nos. 4d and 4e. A clear parallel can also be discerned with an oak Virgin and Child on the Crescent Moon, described as a work of Utrecht manufacture on stylistic grounds (c. 1475).9M. Leeflang et al., Middeleeuwse beelden uit Utrecht 1430-1530/Mittelalterliche Bildwerke aus Utrecht, exh. cat. Utrecht (Museum Catharijneconvent)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2012-13, no. 7.

The ivory Virgin’s sweet facial expression, resembling that of a little girl, is comparable to a female saint, likewise wearing a flower wreath in her hair, attributed to Jan van Steffeswert (before 1465-after 1531) and dated 1501.10P. te Poel et al.¸ Op de drempel van een nieuwe tijd: De Maastrichtse beeldsnijder Jan van Steffeswert (voor 1470-na 1525), exh. cat. Maastricht (Bonnefantenmuseum) 2000-01, no. 14. The most convincing parallel is without doubt a monumental statue of the Virgin that has adorned the niche in the northern transept of the Grote Kerk in Haarlem since the late fifteenth century. The local sculptor Dirick Jacobsz was commissioned to carve this piece in 1496/97.11J.J. Temminck, ‘Beeldhouwwerk’, in J.N. de Boer et al. (eds.), De Bavo te boek: Bij het gereedkomen van de restauratie van de Grote of St. Bavokerk te Haarlem, Haarlem 1985, pp. 148-49 and fig. 96. Despite the statue’s highly abraded condition, the similarity to the ivory’s pose and treatment of the drapery folds is evident. In both cases, Mary wears a wreath about her head, from which long freely hanging strands of hair descend. The most significant difference is the absence of the book. Together with the above-noted stylistic commonalities and the results of the radiocarbon analysis of the ivory from the St Catherine, this suggests all four ivories can reasonably be dated to the third quarter of the fifteenth century.
On the reverse of the Amsterdam ivory one finds an eighteenth-century label with a handwritten text inscribed in Latin – unfortunately only partly legible – along with the year 1786.12For the text of the inscription, my thanks to Bart Schuurman, SAA (written communication, 16 March 2012). Old inscriptions of this nature are an important source for establishing the provenance and dating of ivories, particularly because nineteenth-century copies of medieval ivory carvings made in the neo-gothic style are sometimes scarcely distinguishable from the originals.

Frits Scholten, 2024


Literature

F. Scholten, ‘Acquisitions: Medieval Sculpture from the Goldschmidt-Pol Collection and from Other Donors’, The Rijksmuseum Bulletin 59 (2011), pp. 414-35, esp. no. 7


Citation

F. Scholten, 2024, 'anonymous, Virgin and Child, Northern Netherlands, c. 1460 - c. 1480', in F. Scholten and B. van der Mark (eds.), European Sculpture in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200536061

(accessed 5 December 2025 13:33:43).

Figures

  • fig. a Virgin and Child, Northern Netherlands (? Utrecht), c. 1470-75. Ivory with polychromy and gilding, 11.4 x 3.7 cm. Williamstown (Mass.), Williams College Museum of Art, gift of John Davis Hatch, inv. no. 78.2.4


Footnotes

  • 1R.H. Randall, ‘Dutch Ivories of the Fifteenth Century’, Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 45 (1994), pp. 126-39.
  • 2See F. Scholten, ‘Een Nederlandse ivoren pax uit de Late Middeleeuwen’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 52 (2004), pp. 2-23; I. Reesing, ‘From Ivory to Pipeclay: The Reproduction of Late Medieval Sculpture in the Low Countries’, in E.M. Kavaler, F. Scholten and J. Woodall (eds.), Netherlandish Sculpture of the 16th Century (Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art/Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 67), Leiden/Boston 2017, pp. 256-85.
  • 3Utrecht, Museum Catharijneconvent, (inv. no. ABM bi765), see R. Koekkoek, Gotische ivoren in het Catharijneconvent, coll. cat. Utrecht 1987, no. 16.
  • 4Williamstown (Mass.), Williams College Museum of Art, gift of John Davis Hatch, inv. no. 78.2.4, see R.H. Randall, ‘Dutch Ivories of the Fifteenth Century’, Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 45 (1994), pp. 126-39, esp. p. 138 and fig. 10.
  • 5London, The Wyvern Collection, inv. no. 0852, see P. Williamson, Medieval and Later Ivory Carvings and Small Sculpture: The Wyvern Collection, coll. cat. London 2019, no. 154 (as ‘Netherlands, possibly Utrecht, c. 1460-80’).
  • 6London, The Wyvern Collection, inv. no. 0786, see P. Williamson, Medieval and Later Ivory Carvings and Small Sculpture: The Wyvern Collection, coll. cat. London 2019, no. 151 (as ‘Netherlands, probably Utrecht, c. 1450-70’).
  • 7Cf. Utrecht, Museum Catharijneconvent, inv. no. ABM bh322M, see M. van Vlierden et al., Hout- en steensculptuur van Museum Catharijneconvent, ca. 1200-ca. 1600, coll. cat Utrecht 2004, pp. 242-43.
  • 8M. Leeflang et al., Middeleeuwse beelden uit Utrecht 1430-1530/Mittelalterliche Bildwerke aus Utrecht, exh. cat. Utrecht (Museum Catharijneconvent)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2012-13, nos. 4d and 4e.
  • 9M. Leeflang et al., Middeleeuwse beelden uit Utrecht 1430-1530/Mittelalterliche Bildwerke aus Utrecht, exh. cat. Utrecht (Museum Catharijneconvent)/Aachen (Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum) 2012-13, no. 7.
  • 10P. te Poel et al.¸ Op de drempel van een nieuwe tijd: De Maastrichtse beeldsnijder Jan van Steffeswert (voor 1470-na 1525), exh. cat. Maastricht (Bonnefantenmuseum) 2000-01, no. 14.
  • 11J.J. Temminck, ‘Beeldhouwwerk’, in J.N. de Boer et al. (eds.), De Bavo te boek: Bij het gereedkomen van de restauratie van de Grote of St. Bavokerk te Haarlem, Haarlem 1985, pp. 148-49 and fig. 96.
  • 12For the text of the inscription, my thanks to Bart Schuurman, SAA (written communication, 16 March 2012).